US Federal Reserve Less Likely to Cut Rates, Will Crypto Market Sustain?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-10Last updated on 2026-01-10

Abstract

The US Federal Reserve is highly unlikely to cut interest rates in its upcoming January 27-28 meeting, with market data indicating a 97.2% probability of no change. This decision is influenced by recent economic data, including a slight drop in the unemployment rate to 4.4% in December 2025, coupled with weak annual job growth—the lowest since 2023. While rate cuts typically boost investor liquidity and confidence, the crypto market has shown resilience, with a global cap nearing $3 trillion. Despite current declines, major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH are projected to see significant gains in the next three months.

The US Federal Reserve is less likely to cut rates in its Jan 27-28 meeting. This has triggered anticipation around the possibility for the crypto market to sustain decent gains. Coming as an additional factor is the recently announced unemployment data, wherein a slight drop balanced against job growth has fueled larger skepticism.

Chances for US Federal Reserve to Cut Rates

The US Federal Reserve last cut the interest rate by 0.25% in December 2025. That brought down rates between the target of 3.50% and 3.75%. Now, a poll by Polymarket has underlined that there is a 97.2% chance for the Fed to not cut lending rates in its Jan 27-28 meeting. Notably, the chances for no change to the rate were 81% a month ago.

There are slim chances for rate cuts, per Polymarket. Around 2.5% chances are that the rate will be slashed by 25 bps. The remaining 0.4% chances are in favor of a 50 bps reduction. Chances for a 50 bps rate cut have largely remained the same throughout the month. The possibility for a 25 bps cut has come down from 22.5%, as applicable on December 11, 2025.

Additional Factor Influencing Rate Cut Decision

Recently announced unemployment data is serving as an additional factor possibly influencing the Fed’s decision to cut rates. The unemployment rate has dipped to 4.4% in December 2025, down from 4.5% in November, according to data by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

But, it is balanced against job growth, which was reportedly 50,000 in December last year. This brings annual job growth to 584,000, the weakest since 2023. Optimistic numbers by the US economy is believed to have powered better chances for the US Fed to take a decision instead of leaving an uncertain thread hanging down.

Way for Crypto Market

The crypto market ideally thrives on liquidity, which is injected if investors have sufficient capacity to allocate funds. Rate cuts by the US Federal Reserve are often linked to boosting the capacity and confidence of investors. Effects are less visible, considering the global market cap is a lot closer to the $3 trillion mark at the moment.

Nevertheless, top tokens like BTC and ETH are projected to reverse the ongoing decline in the next 3 months. BTC itself could surge by 12.95% to $102,422, and ETH may soar by 81.09% to $5,576.75 during this timeframe.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Anti-DeFi Ads Urge US Senators to Pass Crypto Bill

TagsCrypto MarketFederal Reserverate cut

Related Questions

QWhat is the likelihood of the US Federal Reserve cutting interest rates in its January 27-28 meeting, according to a Polymarket poll?

AAccording to a Polymarket poll, there is a 97.2% chance that the Fed will not cut lending rates in its January 27-28 meeting.

QWhat was the US unemployment rate in December 2025 and how did it change from the previous month?

AThe US unemployment rate was 4.4% in December 2025, which was a slight dip down from 4.5% in November.

QHow does a rate cut by the Federal Reserve theoretically affect the cryptocurrency market?

ARate cuts by the US Federal Reserve are often linked to boosting the capacity and confidence of investors by increasing liquidity, which the crypto market ideally thrives on.

QWhat are the projected price increases for BTC and ETH over the next 3 months, as mentioned in the article?

ABTC is projected to surge by 12.95% to $102,422, and ETH is projected to soar by 81.09% to $5,576.75 in the next 3 months.

QWhat was the annual job growth figure for the previous year, and why is it significant?

AThe annual job growth was 584,000, which is noted as the weakest since 2023.

Related Reads

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit15m ago

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit15m ago

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit32m ago

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片