Three-Year High Smashes Rate-Cut Hopes, Who's Using CPI to Clean Out Whale Holdings?

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-06-11Last updated on 2026-06-11

Abstract

U.S. CPI inflation accelerated to 4.2% year-over-year in May, reaching a three-year high and dampening market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2026. The surge was primarily driven by a sharp 23.5% annual increase in energy prices, fueled by geopolitical conflicts. While core CPI rose 2.9% year-over-year, showing relative moderation, the hotter-than-expected headline data prompted a repricing in interest rate markets. Traders now overwhelmingly expect the Fed to hold rates steady, with some even pricing in potential rate hikes for late 2026 or 2027. The report triggered declines in major U.S. stock indices and pressured risk assets like Bitcoin, which remained volatile around $61,000-$62,000. Analysts note that while the energy-driven inflation spike is concerning, the controlled core figures provide the Fed room for patience. However, the "higher for longer" interest rate narrative has solidified. For crypto markets, this translates to continued outflows from Bitcoin ETFs, heightened volatility, and a market seemingly in a "capitulation" phase, with leverage reset but sustained demand yet to materialize.


By Ma He, Foresight News


On the evening of June 10th, Beijing time, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics officially released the Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for May 2026. The report showed that driven by a significant surge in energy prices triggered by geopolitical conflicts, U.S. inflationary pressures rebounded noticeably, further dampening market expectations for the Federal Reserve's interest rate cut path within the year. According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the CPI rose 0.5% month-over-month (seasonally adjusted) in May, slightly slower than April's 0.6% increase, but rose 4.2% year-over-year (unadjusted), accelerating significantly from 4.2% in April and reaching the highest level since April 2023. Core CPI (excluding food and energy) rose 0.2% month-over-month, below market expectations of 0.3% and April's 0.4%; it rose 2.9% year-over-year, slightly up from the previous reading of 2.8%, in line with market expectations.


Energy prices were the core driver of this month's inflation rebound. The energy index rose 3.9% month-over-month and surged 23.5% year-over-year. Among them, gasoline prices rose 7.0% month-over-month, soaring 40.5% year-over-year; fuel oil rose 58.9% year-over-year. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics explicitly stated that the energy index contributed to over 60% of the month-over-month increase in the overall CPI for May. Geopolitical conflicts involving Iran and related tensions have continued to push up international oil prices since February, with WTI crude once breaking above $100 per barrel, directly transmitting to U.S. domestic gasoline and energy service costs.


Following the data release, by the close on June 11th, the S&P 500 index fell approximately 1.62%, and the Nasdaq index declined 1.98%. The U.S. dollar index strengthened, and the U.S. Treasury yield curve shifted upward overall.



As a typical risk asset, the crypto market also faced clear pressure—Bitcoin price fluctuated between $61,000 and $62,000 around the data release, with market concerns that hot data could further squeeze liquidity expectations.


No Fed Rate Cuts This Year?


More crucial was the repricing in the interest rate derivatives market. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, the probability of the FOMC meeting on June 16-17 maintaining the federal funds rate unchanged in the current 3.50%-3.75% target range exceeds 96%. The probability of rate cuts for the entire year has significantly decreased, with some traders even starting to price in the possibility of the first rate hike at the end of 2026 or in 2027. The market had previously anticipated 1-2 rate cuts of 25 basis points in 2026, but this path has now been substantially delayed or canceled.


Most institutions believe that this CPI reinforces the expectation of 'higher-for-longer' interest rates, but there is still some distance from truly restarting a rate hike cycle.


Olu Sonola, Chief U.S. Economist at the international credit rating agency Fitch, said: "Headline inflation is indeed hot and heating up, but this isn't yet a story of panic-style rate hikes." He believes that core inflation remains relatively contained, providing the Fed with room to continue holding steady. What will truly determine the policy direction moving forward will be the upcoming months' core inflation and inflation expectation data.


Seema Shah, Chief Global Strategist at Principal Asset Management, stated that while headline inflation above 4% remains unsettling, energy is the primary driving force, and housing inflation is moderating, with no broad "second-round inflation effects" seen yet. Therefore, the Fed still has reason to remain patient.

She also pointed out that the market's current pricing for further rate hikes may be on the high side.


J.P. Morgan Asset Management believes this data may be close to a cyclical peak in this round of inflation. David Kelly, the firm's Chief Global Strategist, said that although inflation levels remain above the target range, "the most likely decision for the Fed at the upcoming policy meeting is to keep rates unchanged" and continue observing subsequent data changes.


The latest data from Kalshi shows the market's bet on the Fed holding rates steady this year has surged to 72%, while the probability of a single 25-basis-point cut has dropped to 18%.




This stands in stark contrast to market expectations at the beginning of the year. In early 2026, the market generally believed the Fed would start a rate-cutting cycle against the backdrop of persistently declining inflation. April's CPI year-over-year had already risen to 3.8%, and the May data further confirmed the inflation rebound trend, making the high-interest-rate policy environment a mainstream narrative once again. While the external shock from energy prices has some temporary nature, if it transmits to core service prices, it will force the Fed to reassess the neutral interest rate level.


For the new Chair Wash, the June meeting is an important debut. Wash was formally sworn in as Fed Chair in late May 2026, succeeding Jerome Powell whose term ended. The June meeting will release a new Summary of Economic Projections and dot plot, and the market will closely watch officials' latest assessments of the inflation path, labor market, and policy rates.


Analyzing at a deeper level, the slowdown in core CPI month-over-month to 0.2% in May provided some relief signals, indicating underlying inflation pressures are not spiraling out of control broadly. However, the Fed historically places more emphasis on the "trend" of core indicators rather than single-month fluctuations, especially against a backdrop of volatile energy prices. The persistent stickiness of housing costs, potential second-round effects (energy costs pushing up other goods and services prices), and geopolitical uncertainties all add complexity to policy formulation.


Crypto and U.S. Stocks


The Fed's policy path is the core anchor for the global liquidity environment. A high-interest-rate or delayed-rate-cut environment is typically accompanied by a stronger dollar, rising U.S. Treasury yields, and pressure on valuations of risk assets. The correlation between crypto assets like Bitcoin and growth-oriented assets like Nasdaq has significantly increased over the past few years. Marginal changes in liquidity expectations are often first reflected in BTC prices and ETF fund flows.


Data from SoSoValue shows that since May this year, Bitcoin spot ETFs have seen significant and continuous net outflows, putting pressure on Bitcoin's price. BTC once fell below the $60,000 mark, later fluctuating around $62,000, with the risk of breaking down again at any time.



Although the current crypto ecosystem is much more mature than during the 2022-2023 bear market, in the short term, CPI data could still trigger a pullback in risk appetite, leverage unwinding, and amplification of short-term volatility.


The latest weekly report data from Glassnode shows that Bitcoin continues to exhibit characteristics of a later-stage correction, with recent buyers suffering significant losses, realized losses remaining high, and several major sources of demand substantially weakened. Bitcoin's price drop to around $60,000 triggered a significant deleveraging event, clearing a large number of speculative positions in the market. While this helps reset leverage levels, spot demand has not yet shown substantive recovery. The options market remains in a defensive posture, implied volatility stays elevated, demand for downside protection is strong, and dealer positioning is concentrated around current spot levels. Combined with declining institutional participation and slowing corporate treasury accumulation, these data points indicate that risk appetite remains low.



Overall, the market appears to be progressing further into a capitulation phase. Although leverage has largely been reset and valuation metrics have reached historically low levels, the demand response typically associated with long-term market lows has not yet materialized.


Historical experience shows that when inflation is mainly driven by supply-side factors like energy and core data remains relatively controlled, markets often gradually repair expectations for a "soft landing" after digesting the initial shock.


As for U.S. stocks, major investment banks maintain optimistic expectations. J.P. Morgan Asset Management believes this data may be close to a cyclical peak in this round of inflation. David Kelly, the firm's Chief Global Strategist, said that although inflation levels remain above the target range, "the most likely decision for the Fed at the upcoming policy meeting is to keep rates unchanged" and continue observing subsequent data changes.


J.P. Morgan indicates that "one-off shocks" like energy shocks may become the new normal. The AI investment cycle continues, but it also warns that inflation is higher than pre-pandemic, the correlation between stocks and bonds may structurally increase, and the 60/40 portfolio faces greater pressure.


Goldman Sachs recently raised its year-end target for the S&P 500 to 8,000 points (previously 7,600), expecting 24% EPS growth in 2026. It believes earnings growth remains the main driver of the stock market, though it noted in recent comments that the probability of Fed rate cuts this year has significantly decreased.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what was the primary driver behind the unexpected rise in the US CPI for May 2026, and by how much did it contribute to the monthly increase?

AThe primary driver was energy prices, specifically due to geopolitical conflicts. The energy index contributed over 60% of the overall CPI's monthly increase.

QHow did the market's expectation for Federal Reserve monetary policy in 2026 change after the release of the May CPI data?

AMarket expectations shifted dramatically. The probability of the Fed holding rates steady for the entire year rose sharply to around 72%, while expectations for 1-2 rate cuts earlier in the year were largely abandoned. Some traders even began pricing in the possibility of a rate hike by late 2026 or 2027.

QWhat contrasting signals does the May CPI report present when comparing the 'Headline CPI' and the 'Core CPI'?

AThe report presents a contrast. The Headline CPI rose sharply by 4.2% year-over-year, a three-year high, driven by surging energy costs. However, the Core CPI (excluding food and energy) rose at a slower-than-expected pace of 0.2% month-over-month and 2.9% year-over-year, indicating that underlying, broader inflationary pressures were more contained.

QWhat impact did the CPI data have on Bitcoin and related crypto market indicators, according to on-chain data firm Glassnode?

AThe data contributed to a bearish environment. Bitcoin experienced significant deleveraging near $60,000, clearing out speculative positions. On-chain data showed severe losses for recent buyers, weakened demand, high implied volatility for downside protection, and a general lack of recovery in spot demand, indicating the market was in a 'capitulation phase'.

QDespite the hot inflation data, why do several cited economists and institutions believe the Fed is unlikely to panic and restart a hiking cycle immediately?

AThey point to the relatively controlled Core CPI figures as providing room for patience. They argue that the inflation surge is primarily driven by temporary energy shocks (supply-side) and has not yet translated into broad-based 'second-round effects' across other goods and services. Therefore, the most likely immediate action is for the Fed to hold rates steady and observe future data.

Related Reads

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News14m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News14m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit42m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit42m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit1h ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片