This Trump-linked firm is hoarding Bitcoin instead of selling: What’s the play?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-28Last updated on 2026-01-28

Abstract

American Bitcoin Corp. (ABTC)), a mining company backed by Donald Trump's sons, has reached a significant milestone by accumulating 5,846 BTC (worth approximately $514.5 million), making it the 18th largest corporate Bitcoin holder globally. This reflects a strategic shift from simply mining Bitcoin to holding it long-term and buying more on the open market, mirroring the "buy the dip" strategy of other major holders. This approach sets ABTC apart from traditional miners who often sell their holdings. The company's growth contrasts with the financial struggles of another Trump-linked firm, Trump Media & Technology Group, which reported significant losses. If ABTC continues to grow its reserves, it could help offset those losses in the eyes of investors.

In a recent episode, American Bitcoin Corp. (ABTC), the mining company backed by Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, has crossed a major milestone.

As per data from Arkham, the firm now holds 5,846 BTC in its reserve, worth about $514.5 million at current prices.

Following this move, ABTC now ranks 18th among the largest corporate Bitcoin [BTC] holders globally, signaling a clear shift in strategy.

This highlights how the company is no longer focused only on mining Bitcoin but on building a long-term balance sheet centered on Bitcoin ownership.

Is ABTC buying the dip?

As Bitcoin is still recovering from its October 2025 all-time high of $124,500, trading near $89,700, ABTC’s strategy suggests that it’s no longer driven by short-term price levels.

Instead, it mirrors the long-term accumulation approach and ‘buy the dip’ agendas used by companies like Strategy.

Rather than selling mined Bitcoin to cover costs, the company is holding onto it and also buying more from the open market.

This puts ABTC in a different category than traditional miners, many of whom regularly liquidate their holdings.

What’s more?

ABTC now sits alongside firms like Galaxy Digital and Tesla, while surpassing many older mining companies that still rely on selling Bitcoin to stay profitable.

Unfortunately, ABTC’s rise comes at a time when another Trump-linked company is struggling. Trump Media & Technology Group recently reported a $54.8 million net loss in Q3 2025.

Revenue fell slightly to under $1 million, while legal costs surged past $20 million. Additionally, Truth Social also continues to operate at a loss with no clear path to profitability yet.

Therefore, if ABTC continues growing its Bitcoin reserves and manages to break into the top 10 corporate holders in 2026, investors may begin to see those losses at Trump Media as less damaging.

Final Thoughts

The company’s strategy suggests that Bitcoin accumulation now matters more than short-term operating margins.
Entering the top 20 places ABTC in the same conversation as established institutional Bitcoin holders.

Chip Stocks Hit Record Highs Since 2000, SaaS Stocks Fall to Yearly Lows: Two Worlds Under the AI Divide

The article highlights a stark divergence in the tech market driven by AI: semiconductor stocks are surging while SaaS stocks plummet. On April 23, Texas Instruments saw its best single-day performance since 2000, with Q1 revenue up 19% and data center revenue surging 90%. Intel also reported blowout results, with revenue far exceeding expectations and its stock rising over 20% after hours. The semiconductor ETF (SMH) is up nearly 28% this year. In contrast, SaaS companies like ServiceNow and IBM experienced historic declines, with ServiceNow dropping 18% despite beating earnings estimates. The software ETF (IGV) has entered a technical bear market, losing about $2 trillion in market cap. The trend, dubbed "SaaSpocalypse," reflects fears that AI agents could reduce the need for software licenses and enable companies to build internal tools instead of relying on SaaS subscriptions. The market is rotating capital from software to semiconductors, betting on AI infrastructure as a safer play. Chip stocks now trade at high valuations—Texas Instruments at a P/E over 50, Intel at 120 times forward earnings—pricing in years of growth. However, this depends on continued massive AI capital expenditure from tech giants. If spending slows, the trend could reverse. For now, the divide persists: chips celebrate, SaaS struggles.

marsbit14m ago

Chip Stocks Hit Record Highs Since 2000, SaaS Stocks Fall to Yearly Lows: Two Worlds Under the AI Divide

marsbit14m ago

From Robinhood to Polymarket: Is the Era of Integrating All Assets on a Single Platform Coming?

From Robinhood to Polymarket: The Era of All-in-One Asset Platforms Is Coming Asset classes are rapidly converging. Platforms that once specialized in single categories—such as stocks, cryptocurrencies, or prediction markets—are now moving toward offering all three. Robinhood pioneered this model, starting with equities, adding crypto in 2018, and prediction markets in 2025. This strategy has proven resilient: when crypto revenues fell, other segments like options and stocks filled the gap. Now, prediction market leaders Polymarket and Kalshi are moving in the same direction, both announcing perpetual futures trading on April 21, 2026, pending regulatory approval. These futures will cover assets like Bitcoin, gold, and stocks such as Nvidia. This trend mirrors the consolidation seen in consumer tech, like smartphones replacing dedicated cameras and MP3 players. Younger users, accustomed to interacting with multiple asset types from an early age, will increasingly demand unified platforms. A key competitive advantage in prediction markets is collateral utilization—idle assets locked during betting periods. Polymarket’s move into perpetuals may be a strategy to generate yield from that capital, similar to earlier DeFi integrations like PolyAave. As the regulatory landscape evolves, traditional finance is also likely to incorporate crypto and prediction markets, further accelerating this convergence.

marsbit15m ago

From Robinhood to Polymarket: Is the Era of Integrating All Assets on a Single Platform Coming?

marsbit15m ago

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbit41m ago

marsbit41m ago

Sam Bankman-Fried Backs Off New Trial Request, Keeps Pressure On Judge Removal

Sam Bankman-Fried has withdrawn his request for a new trial, stating he does not expect a fair hearing from Judge Lewis Kaplan, who oversees his criminal case. He withdrew the motion without prejudice, meaning he can refile it after his appeal and a separate request to remove Kaplan from the case are resolved. Bankman-Fried is serving a 25-year sentence for fraud related to the collapse of FTX. The withdrawal followed a court-ordered inquiry into whether he had legal help drafting an earlier filing, which he denied. His efforts to replace the judge and appeal his conviction continue. Outside court, he has sought a pardon, but former President Trump has indicated he will not grant one.

bitcoinist1h ago

Sam Bankman-Fried Backs Off New Trial Request, Keeps Pressure On Judge Removal

bitcoinist1h ago

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbit1h ago

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?