There is no new boss YET

比推Published on 2026-03-05Last updated on 2026-03-05

Abstract

An Iranian deputy military commander from a southern district stated that the Strait of Hormuz has not been blockaded, but only vessels from the U.S. and Israel are prohibited from passing through. This caused a sharp, temporary drop in market prices for oil, gas, and container shipping routes (except European shipping, which remained down). The statement contrasts with Spain's recent refusal to allow the U.S. to use its bases for operations against Iran, where a spokesperson grimly warned of rising energy prices. Around the same time, a U.S. oil tanker sank in the Strait of Hormuz after reportedly “hitting a reef”—a claim viewed by some as corroboration of Iran’s military reports suggesting it was struck by a missile. The information landscape is filled with conflicting narratives, and all claims may be considered both true and false depending on perspective, as psychological and media operations are integral to modern warfare. There is no single authoritative voice in this conflict; even figures like Trump have contributed to the confusion with performative statements. Amid the chaos, all sides are maneuvering for strategic advantage, while humanitarian concerns are overshadowed by geopolitical games. The situation reflects a self-destructive struggle on a global scale.

Just now, uh, a deputy commander of a military district in southern Iran said something: 'We have not blocked the Strait of Hormuz,' only prohibiting ships from the US and Israel from passing. This instantly scared the market into a slide, things like European shipping, oil, gas. Scared the hell out of them, a complete mess, but at this moment, most have deeply V-recovered [except for European shipping].

This is in stark contrast to the Spanish spokesperson who, with a grave expression [at a press conference announcing Spain's refusal to negotiate with the US and allow the use of Spanish bases to attack Iran], repeatedly stated that oil and gas prices are bound to rise.

At the moment of speaking, a US oil tanker 'ran aground' and sank in the Strait of Hormuz. Think about it, 'running aground' in the world's busiest energy transport artery. This actually verifies the Iranian military's combat report. It was sunk by a missile.

Some might say, with so many messages and news, which one is true? Who is fooling whom? Actually, all can be considered true (truth mixed with falsehood, falsehood mixed with truth, remember all is fair in war.), because there is no leading figure or authority now [even if there is, like Trump giving himself a 15 out of 10 (evaluating US-Iran actions at a press conference, scoring himself, full marks 10.), it would be full of drama, and the war of public opinion has always been synchronized with the overall war and runs through it from beginning to end.]. The information released by all parties at any given moment can be considered true, but viewed from the overall situation or different standpoints, it can also be considered false. 'Everyone' is searching for the kind of 'ladder' Littlefinger talked about in the chaos, collecting as many chips as possible.

As for humanity, as for compassion. Amidst the complex and numerous coercions, there is temporarily no place for them to stand. This is the self-inflicted disaster of a group of microorganisms on this planet.

Whatever, bro.

#KingOfWar#King of War

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7617058

Related Questions

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the Iranian commander's statement about not blocking the Strait of Hormuz?

AThe market was instantly frightened, causing a sharp decline in prices for routes like European container shipping, oil, and gas. However, these prices mostly experienced a deep V-shaped recovery shortly after, except for European container shipping.

QHow did the Spanish spokesperson's statement contrast with the Iranian commander's?

AThe Spanish spokesperson, with a grave expression, repeatedly stated that oil and gas prices would inevitably rise during a press conference where Spain refused to negotiate with the U.S. on using its bases to attack Iran. This formed a sharp contrast to the Iranian commander's statement that they were not blocking the strait but only banning U.S. and Israeli ships.

QWhat incident is reported to have occurred in the Strait of Hormuz that seemingly confirmed Iran's military report?

AA U.S. oil tanker was reported to have 'run aground' and sunk in the Strait of Hormuz. The article suggests this was a cover story and that the tanker was actually sunk by a missile, validating Iran's military claims.

QAccording to the article, why is it difficult to determine the truth from the various news and messages circulating?

AThe article states that all information released by various parties can be considered true at the moment it is given, but when viewed from an overall perspective or different standpoints, it can also be considered false. There is no single authoritative source, and information warfare is full of deception and drama, making it hard to discern the absolute truth.

QWhat is the overall tone of the article towards the geopolitical situation described?

AThe tone is cynical and pessimistic, describing the situation as a chaotic melee where parties are fighting for leverage, with humanity and compassion having no place. It concludes with a resigned 'so be it' attitude, referring to the conflict as the自作孽 (self-inflicted disaster) of the planet's microbes.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit58m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit58m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit58m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit58m ago

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

Coldcard hardware wallet users are facing a new wave of coordinated attacks targeting a firmware flaw, with researcher Alex Thorn flagging 218 recent transactions moving approximately 389 Bitcoin from potentially impacted addresses. The attack pattern shows a high rate of transactions targeting unique victim addresses, differing from previous waves. The vulnerability, which causes affected devices to generate weaker wallet seeds, is estimated to have impacted over 1,100 wallets, leading to around $90 million in Bitcoin stolen. Thorn advises affected users who control their keys may attempt to move funds with a higher-fee transaction before the attacker's transactions are confirmed.

cointelegraph1h ago

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

cointelegraph1h ago

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbit1h ago

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbit1h ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit1h ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片