The World Belongs to Chinese People Who Speak English

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-28Last updated on 2026-02-28

Abstract

The article argues that the world belongs to Chinese people who speak English, positing that a blend of Eastern and Western cultural values creates a powerful advantage, particularly in entrepreneurship. It contrasts Western "romanticism"—characterized by idealism, risk-taking, and long-term vision—with Chinese pragmatism and structural thinking. The author, educated in a US liberal arts college, credits Western education for fostering trust and ambition, while Chinese upbringing provides crucial grounding in practical business models. This hybrid mindset is presented as ideal for navigating global opportunities, exemplified by ventures like a crypto project that successfully merges centralized efficiency with decentralized security. The core message is an exhortation for Chinese individuals to learn English and engage with the world to leverage this cultural synthesis, asserting that limiting oneself to one hemisphere is a missed opportunity.

Just scroll through Instagram and TikTok, and you'll see all kinds of "chinamaxxing" wellness memes. Adidas' new Tang suit jacket sold out instantly online (all bought by foreigners).

Foreign media likes to attribute this to "the rise of China's soft power," but I tend to believe it's the result of a blend of opposition and fusion between Chinese and Western cultures, a result that is particularly evident among entrepreneurs.

On one hand, there's the pragmatism and structural sense ingrained in our DNA from our ancestors; on the other, there's modern Western thought that strips away the overly pedantic parts of traditional wisdom and reshapes a personal form. This combination is inherently well-suited for entrepreneurship.

Western society allows you to be romantic, to be impulsive, to bet on long-term, irrational things. Even if you fail, it doesn't immediately negate your worth as a person. This is a huge tolerance space granted at the institutional and cultural levels.

I studied at a liberal arts college in the US, majoring in psychology, taking courses like metaphysics and art history. My parents always complained that I was learning a bunch of "useless things." But it was precisely these seemingly useless courses that gave me develop an almost instinctive, even somewhat irrational, trust in human agency and mutual tolerance.

I call this state romantic because it is completely opposite to the cynical attitude of "早就看透了" (having seen through it all) or "一眼望到底" (seeing the end at a glance) that is deeply ingrained in many Chinese people.

It is this romanticism that enables a person to dare to give up a stable, high-paying job to start a business, to dare to invest money in a smart contract that hasn't been thoroughly audited. More importantly, it is a way to reconcile with oneself. When you allow yourself to be impulsive, to get excited, to have expectations for long-term value, you also allow yourself to be happy, allow others to be happy, and allow society to improve together.

Of course, if Western romanticism is taken to the extreme, it can easily become detached from reality, floating in the air and getting nothing done. At this point, the pragmatic educational philosophy inherent in Chinese culture becomes particularly important.

Chinese entrepreneurs often prefer to use the term "做生意 / make business," while in the English-speaking world, entrepreneurship is called "start-up." Chinese entrepreneurship prioritizes the business model first (aka, whose money are you making), while the West focuses on the act of starting up.

The crypto space in recent years has been harshly taught a lesson about "not getting things done." A massive amount of energy was spent on low-level narratives and conceptual packaging, while真正的 applications were few and far between. In the end, it was the most primitive赛道 of "speculating on coins" that was firmly controlled by a group of Asian players.

When I first saw Mega's whitepaper, I almost instinctively thought: "This architecture is so reasonable." Centralized sequencer + Ethereum security = faster chain. The logic was clear and straightforward. But this "Sino-Western hybrid" logic is taboo in the eyes of many foreigners because, in their context, centralization is almost synonymous with original sin.

But in my view, centralization was never the original sin; it's just a tool. Many Western teams, operating in a politically correct environment, could never make a choice like Mega's. Yet we can inherit the思维 of "concentrating resources to accomplish major tasks" while using decentralized security as the ultimate backing, instantly expanding the entire想象空间.

But if I had only received a Chinese education, I also know that at best, I could only run a small workshop or small business. What truly made me believe that this kind of "centralized trade-off" could spawn new applications and scale up the entire ecosystem was the Western education I received. It made me dare to believe in system design, believe in structural choices, believe in the possibility of scaling.

Finally, people often tell me I'm a typical "banana person," yellow on the outside, white on the inside. I beg to differ. The world is never black and white, nor is it strictly East or West. The greatest advantage of someone who has truly experienced multiple cultures is the ability to absorb the strengths of each and then recombine them.

Take me, for example. I finished high school in Beijing, went to university in the US, graduated and went to Nigeria in Africa, and later settled down in Dubai, the Middle East. You ask me if I'm a banana or a sweet date, I don't know. But I know one thing:

If you are also a Chinese person who speaks English, you must be brave enough to step out and face the clash of Eastern and Western cultures head-on; there will eventually be arbitrage opportunities for you here. If you were born in China and don't speak English, you must learn it, and then go out into the world.

The world is vast, and only playing half of it is such a waste.

Related Questions

QWhat does the author identify as the key advantage of combining Chinese and Eastern cultural perspectives?

AThe author believes the combination of Chinese pragmatism and structural thinking with Western romanticism and tolerance for risk creates a powerful hybrid mindset ideal for entrepreneurship, allowing individuals to leverage the strengths of both cultures—practical business acumen with innovative, long-term vision.

QHow does the author define 'romanticism' in the context of Western education's influence?

AThe author defines this 'romanticism' as a mindset that trusts human subjectivity, embraces impulsiveness, allows for long-term, non-rational bets, and fosters personal and societal happiness—contrasting with a cynical 'seen-it-all' attitude.

QAccording to the author, what is a fundamental difference between Chinese and Western approaches to entrepreneurship?

AThe author states that Chinese entrepreneurship often focuses first on the business model and revenue streams ('make business'), while Western entrepreneurship emphasizes the act of starting up itself and the vision behind it.

QWhy does the author argue that 'centralization is not an original sin' but a tool, using Mega as an example?

AThe author argues that centralization is merely a tool, and Mega's design—a centralized sequencer with Ethereum security for a faster chain—demonstrates a pragmatic, effective hybrid solution that Western 'political correctness' might reject outright, thus creating an advantage.

QWhat is the core advice the author gives to Chinese people regarding English and global engagement?

AThe author's core advice is that Chinese people who speak English should boldly engage with the world to leverage cultural differences for opportunity, and those who don't should learn English and then go global, because 'the world is big, and playing only half of it is a total waste.'

Related Reads

The Essence of AI Layoffs: Why More AI Adoption Leads to More Corporate Anxiety?

The author, awaiting potential inclusion on an 8000-person layoff list, analyzes the true nature of recent "AI-driven" layoffs. They argue that while AI use, particularly tools like Claude for code generation, has skyrocketed and boosted developer output (e.g., 2-5x more code commits), this has not translated into proportional business growth or revenue. The core issue is a misalignment between increased "Input" (code) and tangible "Outcomes" (user value, revenue). AI acts as a costly B2B SaaS, inflating operational expenses without guaranteed returns. Two key problems emerge: 1) The friction that once filtered out bad ideas is gone, as AI allows cheap pursuit of even weak concepts. 2) Organizational "alignment tax"—the difficulty of coordinating across teams—becomes crippling when development velocity outpaces consensus-building. Thus, layoffs serve two immediate purposes: 1) To offset ballooning AI costs (Token consumption) and maintain cash flow, as rising input costs without outcome growth destroys unit economics. 2) To reduce organizational bloat and alignment friction by simply removing teams, thereby speeding up execution in the short term. Therefore, these layoffs are fundamentally caused by AI, even if AI doesn't directly replace roles. They represent a painful correction until companies learn to convert AI-driven productivity into real business outcomes and streamline organizational coordination to match the new pace of work. The cycle will continue until this learning curve is mastered.

marsbit1h ago

The Essence of AI Layoffs: Why More AI Adoption Leads to More Corporate Anxiety?

marsbit1h ago

Can the Solana Foundation and Google's Collaboration on Pay.sh Bridge the Payment Link Between Web2 and Web3 in the Agent Economy?

Solana Foundation, in collaboration with Google Cloud, has launched Pay.sh, a payment gateway designed to bridge the gap between AI agents and enterprise-grade service infrastructure. The initiative aims to solve a key bottleneck in the "agent economy": existing payment systems are ill-suited for autonomous AI agents. Traditional methods like credit cards require human verification, while newer on-chain protocols like x402 and MPP create a separate, Web3-native system that raises barriers for service providers. Pay.sh functions as a universal payment layer. It allows users to fund a Solana wallet via credit card or stablecoin, which then acts as an identity and payment proxy for AI agents. When an agent needs to access a paid API service (e.g., Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud), Pay.sh handles the transaction seamlessly. It leverages the HTTP 402 status code ("Payment Required") to initiate payments, intelligently choosing between one-time transfers (x402-style) or session-based authorizations (MPC-style) based on the service's billing model. This spares agents from manual account registration and API key management. A key feature for service providers is low integration effort. They can adopt Pay.sh by providing a declarative configuration file, enabling features like tiered pricing, free tiers, and automatic revenue splitting to multiple addresses (e.g., for royalties, cloud costs). Providers can also list their APIs in a central Pay Skill Registry for agent discovery. The collaboration with Google Cloud provides crucial infrastructure for API proxying, traffic routing, and compliance logging, aiming to keep agent activities within regulated boundaries. By connecting Web2 services with Web3 payment rails, Pay.sh positions the Solana wallet as a foundational identity and payment tool for AI agents, potentially driving more transaction volume to the Solana ecosystem. However, the report notes challenges. The service registry currently lacks robust vetting, risking exposure to unauthorized or malicious third-party APIs. Pay.sh also inherits security and compatibility risks from its underlying payment protocols (x402, MPC). Furthermore, adoption may be hindered by varying regional data privacy and payment compliance regulations among API providers. Despite these hurdles, Pay.sh represents a significant step towards integrating Web2 and Web3 for autonomous agent commerce.

marsbit1h ago

Can the Solana Foundation and Google's Collaboration on Pay.sh Bridge the Payment Link Between Web2 and Web3 in the Agent Economy?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy PEOPLE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)After purchasing your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Easily trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

6.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy PEOPLE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PEOPLE (PEOPLE) are presented below.

活动图片