The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-12Last updated on 2026-05-12

Abstract

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and pric...

Author: BlockBeats

Undoubtedly, the current main narrative within the Base ecosystem remains AI. To be more precise, it's "VVV."

Before introducing the tokens related to the "VVV" concept, let's first understand what "VVV" actually is.

What is the "VVV" Concept?

$VVV is the token of Venice, which is a privacy-first and censorship-resistant generative AI platform on the Base ecosystem, led by Erik Voorhees.

Erik is a seasoned OG in the crypto space since 2011, having played a pivotal role in early Bitcoin adoption. After the Mt.Gox collapse, he founded ShapeShift, one of the first platforms to emphasize non-custodial and privacy-first trading. His expertise in decentralized finance and user sovereignty makes him a strong advocate for permissionless AI.

According to the Venice API user statistics chart disclosed by Erik Voorhees in March, Venice's API user count grew from near zero to 15,000 throughout 2025.

However, the corresponding price performance of $VVV has been lukewarm, with occasional rebounds reaching only about a $200 million market cap at most. It once fell below a $45 million market cap, far from its all-time high of nearly $1 billion when it first launched.

It's also noticeable that entering 2026, Venice's API user count experienced rapid growth. This has to be credited to the explosion of OpenClaw. Due to its privacy-focused positioning, Venice was prominently recommended in the model provider section of OpenClaw's official documentation.

Although this prominent recommendation was later removed, 2026 has been a year of rapid growth for Venice. According to data disclosed by Erik Voorhees, by March this year, Venice's total user count exceeded 2 million, paid subscription users reached 55,000, monthly revenue hit $835,000, with a monthly growth rate of 15%.

Corresponding to this is the continuous rise of $VVV. Since entering 2026, $VVV has increased by over 9 times.

$VVV/$DIEM

Earlier, we covered Venice's growth in exposure and user numbers this year, which are the macro-narrative reasons for its rise. But as a crypto AI project with a token, its price increase is also closely tied to the token's mechanisms.

This year, the annual emission of $VVV has undergone multiple reductions and adjustments, dropping from 8 million tokens per year to 5 million. By July 1st, the annual emission will be further reduced to 3 million tokens. The official stated goal is to achieve net deflation for $VVV, ensuring the burn rate exceeds the emission rate to guarantee $VVV's native yield.

$VVV's initial total supply was 100 million tokens. The current total token supply is approximately 79.9 million, with 42.22% (about 33.73 million) of the current supply already burned.

The burn of $VVV is linked to Venice's subscription revenue. At the end of April, Venice allocated more subscription revenue towards token buybacks. For each new Pro plan subscription ($18), $2 will be allocated to buy back and burn $VVV. The Pro+ plan ($68) and Max plan ($200) correspond to $5 and $10 for buyback and burn, respectively.

The current circulating token count is approximately 46 million tokens. Additionally, about 8.85 million tokens remain locked, and around 32.47 million tokens are staked.

The token utility of $VVV is quite interesting. Compared to the awkward situation faced by past crypto projects where "token rights are useless compared to equity," $VVV offers a very compelling solution.

On the foundation of continuously controlling token supply, staking $VVV not only earns more $VVV (receiving more rewards from emission cuts) but also grants the right to mint $DIEM using the staked token $sVVV.

$DIEM can either be traded or staked. Staking 1 $DIEM corresponds to $1 worth of Venice API credit per day.

This credit refreshes daily; what's used today is replenished tomorrow, and it's permanent. What can you do with $1 of Venice API credit? Quite a lot, according to Venice itself:

Stake 1 $DIEM, and get free daily processing of the above with Venice.

However, one must consider that the current price of one $DIEM has skyrocketed to around $1,500. To mint one $DIEM requires approximately 756 $sVVV, costing about $12,800. Is it worth it? Venice's own calculation looks like this:

Overall, the $VVV/$DIEM economic structure, combined with Venice's regulatory mechanisms, gives $VVV a genuine "tech stock" flavor while retaining unique crypto characteristics:

- Supply-side emission reduction prevents excessive dilution of token value (and also protects the $VVV dividends for stakers from dilution).

- Subscription revenue is used for token buybacks.

- Staked $VVV can be used to mint $DIEM, allowing the token to serve a practical function within the product through $DIEM.

- However, this practical utility comes at a cost; $VVV used to mint $DIEM only receives 80% of the dividends ($VVV staking rewards).

- Enables on-chain DeFi operations, such as staking $VVV to obtain $DIEM, then selling $DIEM to buy more $VVV. There are even community projects like @cheaptokensAI that allow users to profit without selling $DIEM, by reselling the daily credit granted by $DIEM.

$POD

Since entering May, $POD has surged over 12 times at its peak, with its market cap rising from about $7.8 million to briefly surpass $100 million.

$POD is the token for Dolphin's distributed AI inference and training network. In simple terms, it involves "mining" with idle GPUs, providing computing power to those needing AI computation services, and earning $POD rewards.

However, the reason for $POD's speculative frenzy isn't the network itself, but another aspect of Dolphin's business—AI models. Venice's current default model, Venice Uncensored 1.2, is jointly developed by Dolphin and Venice and evolved from Dolphin Mistral 24B Venice Edition.

Therefore, although $POD is solely the token for Dolphin's distributed AI network, at this stage, it is being treated as the only investment vehicle for Dolphin and is being heavily speculated upon.

$cyb3rwr3n

This project claims to be building a USDC-based auction market for Venice usage credits. However, it is seen as part of the "VVV" related concepts largely because some players, after analyzing correlations between on-chain behavior and tweets, believe this project is highly associated with Venice founder Erik Voorhees.

The Venice official Twitter account has clarified these speculations, stating that cyb3rwr3n is not an official Venice project.

When this news broke last month, it caused about a 50% price drop, but a few days ago, the token hit a new all-time high. The official clarification hasn't completely erased market associations. According to some community discussions, Erik Voorhees was the first follower of the cyb3rwr3n official Twitter account, and Venice team members like co-founder @TeanaTaylor, CTO @jesseproudman, and product lead @willyogo also follow the account. They argue that even if Venice has no formal link, the supportive sentiment conveyed by such interactions is still a significant bullish signal.

This is also currently one of the cheaper tokens among "VVV" related concepts, with only a $4 million market cap. But being cheap comes with reasons—its product hasn't launched yet, and it currently functions more like a meme coin.

$SR

STRIKEROBOT.AI is a full-stack embodied intelligence platform building a humanoid robot framework for physical AI Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), focusing on safety in hazardous environments (nuclear plants, high-voltage facilities, radiation zones, etc.).

They have a robot training and simulation platform called SR Platform, and $SR is the token for this platform. The project's connection to Venice is the announcement on May 7th about jointly developing a VLM inference layer for robots with Venice and receiving funding sponsorship from Venice.

Since entering May, $SR has risen approximately 4 times, with a current market cap of around $9 million.

Related Questions

QWhat is the 'VVV' concept referred to in the article, and what is its primary platform?

AThe 'VVV' concept refers to the $VVV token associated with Venice, which is a privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform on the Base blockchain ecosystem, led by Erik Voorhees.

QAccording to the article, what was a significant driver for Venice's rapid growth in user numbers in 2026?

AThe significant driver for Venice's rapid growth in user numbers in 2026 was its high-profile recommendation in the official documentation of the popular project OpenClaw, thanks to its privacy-focused positioning.

QHow does the Venice platform's subscription model contribute to the $VVV token's economics?

AVenice uses a portion of its subscription revenue from Pro, Pro+, and Max packages to buy back and burn $VVV tokens. For example, each new $18 Pro subscription allocates $2 for this buyback and burn, creating deflationary pressure on the token's supply.

QWhat is the relationship between the $VVV token and the $DIEM token within the Venice ecosystem?

AStaking $VVV tokens yields staked $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM token provides a daily $1 credit for using the Venice API. While $DIEM can be traded, it also has this core utility within the Venice product.

QBesides $VVV itself, name two other tokens mentioned in the article that are considered part of the 'VVV' concept and briefly state their connection to Venice.

ATwo other tokens are $POD and $SR. $POD is the token for Dolphin, a distributed AI network, which co-developed the Venice Uncensored 1.2 model with Venice. $SR is the token for STRIKEROBOT.AI, which received funding from Venice and is collaborating with them to develop a VLM inference layer for robots.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit15m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit15m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片