The Second Half of Macro Influencer Fu Peng's Career

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-21Last updated on 2026-04-21

Abstract

Fu Peng, a prominent Chinese macroeconomist and former chief economist of Northeast Securities, has joined Hong Kong-based digital asset management firm Bitfire Group (formerly New Huo Group) as its chief economist. This move, announced in April 2026, triggered an 11% surge in Bitfire's stock price. Fu, known for his accessible macroeconomic commentary and large social media following, will focus on integrating digital assets into global asset allocation frameworks, particularly combining FICC (fixed income, currencies, and commodities) with cryptocurrencies for institutional clients. His career includes roles at Lehman Brothers and Solomon International, with significant influence gained through public communication. However, in late 2024, Fu faced temporary social media bans after a controversial private speech at HSBC on China's economic challenges, though he denied regulatory sanctions. He later left Northeast Securities citing health reasons. Bitfire, a licensed virtual asset manager serving high-net-worth clients, seeks to build trust and attract traditional capital through Fu’s expertise and credibility. The partnership represents a strategic shift for both: Fu enters the crypto sector after a traditional finance peak, while Bitfire aims to leverage his macro framework for institutional adoption. Outcomes remain uncertain regarding capital inflows and compatibility within corporate structure.

Author: BitalkNews

On the morning of April 20, 2026, the stock price of New Huo Group suddenly surged, rising more than 11% during the session.

What triggered this market movement was a piece of news that simultaneously ignited the financial and crypto circles: Fu Peng, former chief economist of Northeast Securities, officially joined New Huo Group as chief economist.

The news was first disclosed by Tencent News' "First Line," and New Huo Group subsequently confirmed it. Fu Peng himself also stated to the media: "It is mainly about combining FICC and C businesses."

Among them, FICC refers to fixed income, foreign exchange, and commodities, while C refers to cryptocurrency. His main work after joining will be to incorporate digital assets into the global asset allocation framework, providing macro research and asset allocation support for New Huo's institutional clients.

This is the first time he has reappeared in the public eye with an official position nearly a year after leaving Northeast Securities. For him, this is not just a change of employer but more like a restart of his career narrative.

The first half reached the pinnacle in the traditional financial system but was interrupted by controversy and illness; the second half is chosen in Hong Kong, in the crypto track, at the intersection where traditional finance and digital assets are slowly merging.

The Path of an Atypical Chief

In 2004, Fu Peng joined Lehman Brothers and later served as the head of global macro hedge strategy design at Solomon International Investment Group, responsible for currency, commodity, and major asset linkage analysis, for nearly four years.

He returned to China at the end of 2008 and worked at institutions such as Shandong High-Tech Investment, CIFCO, Galaxy Futures, Galaxy Securities, and Essence Securities.

In February 2020, he joined Northeast Securities as chief economist. His approach in this role differed from most of his peers: he made self-media his main battlefield.

He often used analogies and metaphors to explain economic logic, with a performance-style flair. His Weibo account, "Fu Peng's Financial World," has accumulated over 4 million followers, while his Douyin (TikTok) followers have reached 1.485 million. On Xiaohongshu and Bilibili, he has 355,000 and 773,000 followers, respectively.

In 2024, he published "Witnessing the Countercurrent," using a three-layer framework of "politics/distribution—macro—assets" to explain changes in global asset logic after 2016.

This approach gave him high recognition in the financial circle, making him an analyst who could present complex macro logic in an accessible way to ordinary investors.

The Consequences of a Speech

In late November 2024, Fu Peng was invited to give a year-end speech at an internal HSBC Private Wealth Planning event in Shanghai. The content covered China's declining demand, shrinking middle-class income,加剧的消费分化, and his judgment that current stimulus policies could not replicate the effects of the 2008 measures.

The recording and transcript were widely circulated online, removed from multiple platforms, and his WeChat and short video accounts were banned for nearly half a year.

Rumors emerged that he was canceled due to regulatory talks. Fu Peng publicly responded, directly criticizing HSBC, sharing chat records, and stating, "A lawyer's letter is already on the way, waiting for your apology."

Northeast Securities also stated: There has been no recent regulatory discussion. HSBC responded that it was "looking into the relevant situation." After that, the matter quietly faded from public discussion, with no further progress, eventually ending without resolution.

During the account ban, Fu Peng's channels for public expression were significantly reduced.

On April 30, 2025, he officially resigned from Northeast Securities, explaining externally: He had just undergone two major surgeries and needed to rest for more than half a year.

Predictive Ability and Boundaries

Among Fu Peng's fan base, there are many stories about his accurate predictions, covering the 2008 financial crisis, the recovery of the Japanese stock market, and the turning point of China's real estate cycle. Since 2016, he has consistently emphasized de-globalization and changes in interest rate trends, with parts of his framework later validated to some extent.

However, his prediction record is not consistent. There have been clear deviations in short-term exchange rates and specific policy windows, with some judgments criticized as overly pessimistic or significantly inaccurate due to policy interventions. He himself admits that macro research focuses on structural variables, not next quarter's data. This is both a methodological explanation and a preventive clarification for short-term inaccuracies.

What he provides is a framework for interpreting the world, not a stable, reproducible prediction tool. Describing him as a prophet who gets everything right is a misinterpretation.

One of his major advantages is his ability to express complex macro logic in an accessible manner while maintaining relatively independent judgment. This allows his influence to reach a broader audience, and this characteristic is precisely what New Huo Group needs most.

Why Choose New Huo

Theoretically, Fu Peng had more than one option for his comeback. Traditional securities firms would welcome him back, and the role of chief economist is familiar to him, but he chose New Huo.

The space in traditional finance is narrowing. For someone who spoke so bluntly in the HSBC speech, returning to the system would mean something he likely understands better than anyone.

His skill set was never limited to traditional assets; FICC has always been his forte. After institutionalization, the connection between crypto assets and macro logic has become increasingly evident. Interest rate cycles, dollar liquidity, geopolitical risk premiums—these variables affect both traditional and digital assets.

There is also a more practical factor: a comeback requires a suitable stage.

New Huo Group is licensed in Hong Kong, listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange, and operates within a compliance framework. At the same time, its size and stage provide enough flexibility to allow a strong-minded individual to build a new research system. This is a completely different situation from playing a fixed role in a mature large institution.

Why New Huo Needs Him

New Huo Group currently positions itself as a digital asset management institution for high-net-worth clients. It holds Hong Kong SFC Type 1, 4, and 9 licenses and a TCSP trust license, making it one of the较早实现全牌照虚拟资产管理的机构 in Hong Kong.

In 2025, Weng Xiaoqi became CEO, launched the Bitfire Premium service, acquired a majority stake in the Japanese licensed exchange BitTrade, exited the retail market, and focused on family offices, listed companies, and institutional clients. At the end of March 2026, the company was renamed New Huo Group Holdings Limited, with the English name Bitfire Group.

Financially, total revenue for the 2025 fiscal year was HKD 8.661 billion, a year-on-year increase of over 450%, but growth was mainly driven by low-margin crypto OTC trading volume. The company整体依然亏损. Management has designated 2026 as the year for profitability, with significant pressure.

The compliance framework is in place, and growth numbers are impressive, but what New Huo truly lacks at this stage is not流量, but trust.

The clients it serves—family office partners, financial executives of listed companies, private investors with substantial wealth—do not lack information or data. What they lack is a narrative framework that can make them comfortable with digital assets and a professional image from the traditional financial world.

Weng Xiaoqi stated this logic quite bluntly: "Fu Peng's profound global macro research capabilities and precise market liquidity insights will become the company's top strategic brain... helping clients accurately grasp certainty in the era of 'FICC+C.'"

Fu Peng's background in international investment banking and hedge funds, his independent public persona, and his million-level influence constitute a recognizable professional signal for traditional wealthy individuals evaluating whether to allocate more funds to digital assets.

This is a transaction where both sides get what they need.

A Beginning Without a Conclusion

On one side is a person who emerged from the traditional financial system, experienced highs, controversies, and a forced interruption, now seeking a space to continue expressing and contributing. On the other side is a company striving to transition from a trading platform to an institutional service provider, attempting to establish a language more easily understood by traditional capital.

Can the appeal of macro narratives translate into real institutional capital inflows? How long can Fu Peng's independent style last within the framework of a listed company?

Will the trust of traditional wealthy clients in digital assets ultimately be built on framework认同, or will it still require further regulatory developments? These questions will take time to answer.

Related Questions

QWhat is the immediate market reaction to Fu Peng joining Xinhua Group, and what was the stock performance?

AXinhua Group's stock price surged by over 11% during the morning session on April 20, 2026, following the announcement of Fu Peng's appointment as Chief Economist.

QWhat are Fu Peng's main responsibilities at Xinhua Group, particularly regarding FICC and C?

AFu Peng's primary role is to integrate digital assets into the global asset allocation framework, providing macro research and asset allocation support for institutional clients, with FICC referring to fixed income, currencies, and commodities, and C referring to cryptocurrencies.

QWhy did Fu Peng leave his previous position at Northeast Securities, and what was the public reason given?

AFu Peng left Northeast Securities in April 2025, with the public explanation being that he needed to recuperate for over six months after undergoing two major surgeries.

QWhat incident led to Fu Peng's social media accounts being suspended, and how did he respond?

AHis accounts were suspended after a speech at a HSBC private wealth event in late 2024, where he discussed sensitive economic issues. He publicly criticized HSBC, threatened legal action, and shared chat records demanding an apology.

QWhy does Xinhua Group need someone like Fu Peng, and what does his appointment signify for their business strategy?

AXinhua Group needs Fu Peng to build trust with high-net-worth and institutional clients by providing a credible macro narrative for digital assets, leveraging his traditional finance background and public influence to attract traditional capital into the crypto space.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit49m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit49m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit2h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片