The Person Who Made $69 Million from NFTs Four Years Ago Is Still Making Money

深潮Published on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

Four years after making $69 million from an NFT sale, Beeple continues to innovate and profit in the digital art space. Despite the decline in the NFT market, he recently launched "Regular Animals" at Art Basel—a collection of 256 eerie robotic dogs with human faces resembling figures like Musk, Warhol, and Picasso. These AI-driven sculptures use cameras and visual algorithms to create art based on their surroundings. The NFTs, initially given away for free, now trade for over 10 ETH (around $35,000) on OpenSea, valuing the giveaway near $9 million. A physical series of 1,024 pieces is also available, with listings reaching $6,500 on eBay—though the digital versions remain more valuable. Beeple, who once struggled to sell art for over $100, now operates a large studio with a team of artists and engineers, including a former Boeing engineer and a renowned art curator. His work continues to bridge crypto and traditional art, gaining attention from outlets like WSJ.

Written by: Cookie, Lüdong

beeple, the man who sold one NFT for a staggering $69 million, has long been seen as a symbol of the golden age of NFTs that once was.

Although the glory of NFTs has faded, beeple and his team have remained active in the NFT space. At this year's Art Basel, he brought another "golden dog" to the currently quiet NFT market—Regular Animals.

Yesterday, multiple Regular Animals were sold on OpenSea for over 10 ETH (approximately $35,000) each. These artworks were given away for free at Art Basel, with a total of 256 pieces. At this price, beeple essentially gave away nearly ten million dollars worth of NFTs at Art Basel.

The project that beeple and his team brought to Art Basel is Regular Animals. These are robotic dogs, as shown in the image below. They look somewhat eerie because these robotic dogs have human faces, and they are faces of well-known figures such as Musk, Andy Warhol, Zuckerberg, Picasso, and even beeple himself.

Of course, it's not just about the eerie visual effect. These robotic dogs use the cameras on their heads to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks.

The selection of these famous figures is not arbitrary. The reason for choosing the aforementioned celebrities is that they have influenced how we view the world, whether through algorithms, art, or politics. As humans, we observe the world through these perspectives, and so do these robotic dogs. At Art Basel, these robotic dogs and humans observed each other, and each moment of observation became an artwork created by the robotic dogs. These artworks are also like autobiographies of these robotic dogs.

Interestingly, Regular Animals also has a physical series, with a total of 1,024 pieces. On eBay, someone has already listed one for a fixed price of $6,500. The market's valuation is that NFTs are far more valuable than physical paintings, reminiscent of Damien Hirst's "The Currency" series years ago, which forced owners to choose between physical and NFT versions.

Before achieving great success in the NFT field, beeple had been creating art every day since 2007 but had never sold anything for more than $100. After gaining fame and fortune, beeple did not squander it like some artists or crypto project teams. Instead, he acquired a studio/gallery of about 460 square meters, built a team of dozens of 3D artists, engineers, and researchers (even including a former Boeing engineer), invited Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev, the former director of the Castello di Rivoli Museum of Contemporary Art, as an advisor, and continuously exhibited at art shows around the world while creating new artworks.

This exhibition of beeple's robotic dogs has not only gained attention in the crypto circle due to its price but has also been covered by traditional media outlets like WSJ.

Related Questions

QWho is Beeple and what is he known for in the NFT world?

ABeeple is an artist who gained fame for selling an NFT for $69 million, symbolizing the golden era of NFTs.

QWhat is the name of Beeple's latest NFT project featured at the Basel Art Show?

ABeeple's latest project is called 'Regular Animals,' which features robotic dogs with human faces of famous personalities.

QHow many Regular Animals NFTs were distributed for free at the Basel Art Show, and what was their estimated total value?

A256 Regular Animals NFTs were distributed for free at the Basel Art Show, with an estimated total value of nearly $9 million based on secondary market sales.

QWhat unique ability do the Regular Animals robotic dogs have?

AThe Regular Animals robotic dogs use cameras to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks, which serve as their autobiographies.

QHow has Beeple's approach to his career evolved since his NFT success?

ABeeple has established a large studio, assembled a team of artists and engineers, and continues to create and exhibit artworks globally, focusing on innovation rather than extravagance.

Related Reads

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

The article discusses the evolving relationship between Ethereum's Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions, moving beyond the initial "L2 for scaling" model. As Ethereum L1 itself scales (increasing Gas Limit, statelessness, zkEVM), the unique value proposition of L2s shifts from merely providing cheap execution to offering differentiated features like application-specific optimization, privacy, and flexible governance. The piece explores three key themes: 1. **L2's New Role:** L2s are transitioning from a pure scaling technology to a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum L1. 2. **Interoperability as State Trust:** Solving L2 fragmentation is less about cross-chain bridges and more about enabling faster, trust-minimized state verification between environments. This involves initiatives like faster L1 finality, intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), and native account abstraction. 3. **Blurring Layers:** With the potential integration of zk-proofs into L1 validation (making L1 akin to its own "Rollup") and the concept of "Native Rollups," the rigid boundary between L1 and L2 may fade. The future could be a unified system with multiple execution domains (for DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.) sharing a common security, settlement, and state framework. In conclusion, Ethereum's goal is not to abandon L2s or re-centralize everything on L1, but to re-integrate the fragmented user experience—liquidity, accounts, applications—while preserving the scaling benefits of a multi-environment ecosystem. The endgame is a cohesive "one chain" feeling for users, powered by diverse but securely interconnected execution layers.

marsbit12m ago

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

marsbit12m ago

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

U.S. lawmakers are attempting to advance the Clarity Act, a significant crypto market structure bill, but its path is fraught with partisan hurdles. The process has been rocky since January, when a prior bipartisan deal in the Senate Banking Committee was upended. A key compromise in May on "yield" issues allowed the bill to move forward in committee, but only with the conditional support of two Democratic senators, Angela Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego. They emphasized that their final vote depends on reaching an agreement on ethics provisions for elected officials. Ultimately, the Senate Agriculture Committee passed its version along party lines without Democratic support. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, the demand for strong ethics language has expanded beyond Democrats. Additional controversies surround provisions related to yields (aligning some Republicans with large banks) and developer protections (opposed by enforcement agencies). Core concerns about illicit finance and consumer protection remain central to the debate. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, achieving the necessary bipartisan compromise is proving difficult. While momentum exists—including recent meetings between senators and White House officials—a reconciled bill text faces skepticism. Senator Gallego has stated that without ethics terms acceptable to Democrats, they will not provide the needed votes. The immediate goals for the crypto community in Congress are unclear: a symbolic Senate vote before the August recess, eventual passage into law by 2026, or forging a final compromise framework. The arduous, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support continues, mirroring the traditional legislative grind the industry must now navigate.

Foresight News1h ago

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片