The Person Who Made $69 Million from NFTs Four Years Ago Is Still Making Money

深潮Published on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

Four years after making $69 million from an NFT sale, Beeple continues to innovate and profit in the digital art space. Despite the decline in the NFT market, he recently launched "Regular Animals" at Art Basel—a collection of 256 eerie robotic dogs with human faces resembling figures like Musk, Warhol, and Picasso. These AI-driven sculptures use cameras and visual algorithms to create art based on their surroundings. The NFTs, initially given away for free, now trade for over 10 ETH (around $35,000) on OpenSea, valuing the giveaway near $9 million. A physical series of 1,024 pieces is also available, with listings reaching $6,500 on eBay—though the digital versions remain more valuable. Beeple, who once struggled to sell art for over $100, now operates a large studio with a team of artists and engineers, including a former Boeing engineer and a renowned art curator. His work continues to bridge crypto and traditional art, gaining attention from outlets like WSJ.

Written by: Cookie, Lüdong

beeple, the man who sold one NFT for a staggering $69 million, has long been seen as a symbol of the golden age of NFTs that once was.

Although the glory of NFTs has faded, beeple and his team have remained active in the NFT space. At this year's Art Basel, he brought another "golden dog" to the currently quiet NFT market—Regular Animals.

Yesterday, multiple Regular Animals were sold on OpenSea for over 10 ETH (approximately $35,000) each. These artworks were given away for free at Art Basel, with a total of 256 pieces. At this price, beeple essentially gave away nearly ten million dollars worth of NFTs at Art Basel.

The project that beeple and his team brought to Art Basel is Regular Animals. These are robotic dogs, as shown in the image below. They look somewhat eerie because these robotic dogs have human faces, and they are faces of well-known figures such as Musk, Andy Warhol, Zuckerberg, Picasso, and even beeple himself.

Of course, it's not just about the eerie visual effect. These robotic dogs use the cameras on their heads to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks.

The selection of these famous figures is not arbitrary. The reason for choosing the aforementioned celebrities is that they have influenced how we view the world, whether through algorithms, art, or politics. As humans, we observe the world through these perspectives, and so do these robotic dogs. At Art Basel, these robotic dogs and humans observed each other, and each moment of observation became an artwork created by the robotic dogs. These artworks are also like autobiographies of these robotic dogs.

Interestingly, Regular Animals also has a physical series, with a total of 1,024 pieces. On eBay, someone has already listed one for a fixed price of $6,500. The market's valuation is that NFTs are far more valuable than physical paintings, reminiscent of Damien Hirst's "The Currency" series years ago, which forced owners to choose between physical and NFT versions.

Before achieving great success in the NFT field, beeple had been creating art every day since 2007 but had never sold anything for more than $100. After gaining fame and fortune, beeple did not squander it like some artists or crypto project teams. Instead, he acquired a studio/gallery of about 460 square meters, built a team of dozens of 3D artists, engineers, and researchers (even including a former Boeing engineer), invited Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev, the former director of the Castello di Rivoli Museum of Contemporary Art, as an advisor, and continuously exhibited at art shows around the world while creating new artworks.

This exhibition of beeple's robotic dogs has not only gained attention in the crypto circle due to its price but has also been covered by traditional media outlets like WSJ.

Related Questions

QWho is Beeple and what is he known for in the NFT world?

ABeeple is an artist who gained fame for selling an NFT for $69 million, symbolizing the golden era of NFTs.

QWhat is the name of Beeple's latest NFT project featured at the Basel Art Show?

ABeeple's latest project is called 'Regular Animals,' which features robotic dogs with human faces of famous personalities.

QHow many Regular Animals NFTs were distributed for free at the Basel Art Show, and what was their estimated total value?

A256 Regular Animals NFTs were distributed for free at the Basel Art Show, with an estimated total value of nearly $9 million based on secondary market sales.

QWhat unique ability do the Regular Animals robotic dogs have?

AThe Regular Animals robotic dogs use cameras to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks, which serve as their autobiographies.

QHow has Beeple's approach to his career evolved since his NFT success?

ABeeple has established a large studio, assembled a team of artists and engineers, and continues to create and exhibit artworks globally, focusing on innovation rather than extravagance.

Related Reads

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手Just now

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手Just now

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit8m ago

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit8m ago

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1h ago

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片