The Fall of Crypto Actually Has Little to Do with Scamming Retail Investors

比推Published on 2026-03-12Last updated on 2026-03-12

Abstract

The decline of Crypto is not primarily due to "scamming retail investors," but stems from deeper structural issues, according to a seasoned Crypto OG. Key problems include: 1. **Misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s Whitepaper**: The core concept is not "decentralization" (a term absent in the whitepaper) but "distributed trust architecture" — eliminating the need for trusted third parties. Many projects fail to achieve even basic distributed systems while overusing decentralized rhetoric. 2. **Loss of Incremental Users**: Grand narratives (Web3, Metaverse, GameFi, etc.) have oversold the technology’s capabilities, leading to repeated user disappointment and eroded trust. The market now suffers from a lack of new participants. 3. **Erosion of Community Belief**: Many communities engage in "narrative engineering" — using complex jargon to attract new users while insiders anticipate selling at peaks. This creates a cycle of hype, pump, and dump, damaging overall market credibility. 4. **Premature Financialization**: Crypto prioritized token launches and financialization before establishing robust infrastructure or mature applications. This led to overvaluation and repeated failures when technology couldn’t support inflated prices. 5. **Shift in Attention**: Human attention is moving from social and community interactions (like Telegram and Discord) toward AI-driven engagement. As an attention-dependent market, Crypto is naturally declining as interest wanes. The OG concludes that...

Source: Jiayan Kea


Some time ago, I had coffee with friends from Stanford, and the topic of Crypto came up at the table.

This kind of gathering is quite typical: VCs, engineers, entrepreneurs, and a few seasoned players. A young man suddenly said:

"Crypto is failing now because retail investors were scammed too hard."

Many at the table nodded. Sitting next to me was an old OG who had been in the Crypto space for over a decade. He had been silent until then.

Hearing this, he smiled, put down his coffee, and said:

"The fall of Crypto actually has little to do with scamming retail investors." Everyone was a bit surprised. Because the mainstream narrative nowadays is almost always: projects are too greedy, scams are too harsh, and the market has been ruined.

The old OG shook his head and said:

"Scamming retail investors has never been the problem; financial markets have been doing it for centuries. The real issue is—the underlying logic is wrong."

He said Crypto has at least a few fundamental issues.

First Point: Many People Have Never Seriously Read Satoshi's Whitepaper

The old OG shared something interesting observation.

He said he sometimes asks people working on projects: "Have you read the Bitcoin whitepaper?"

Many say they have. But if he follows up with: "What is the most core word in it?" Most people would say:

Decentralization.

He directly shook his head and said: "The word 'decentralization' doesn’t appear even once in the whitepaper." Someone at the table checked on their phone—it was true.

The old OG continued: The word that actually appears repeatedly in the whitepaper is:

Distributed


Mentioned about 6 times.

And the real problem it aimed to solve was captured in one sentence:

remove the need for a trusted third party

Eliminate the need for a trusted third party.

He said this is the soul of Crypto, not "decentralization," but a distributed trust structure.

Now, many projects haven’t even achieved the most basic distributed architecture.

Nodes are fake.

Governance is fake.

The network is fake.

And then they talk nonstop about:

Decentralization.

He said something particularly harsh:

"Talking about decentralization without even achieving distributed architecture is like building a skyscraper on sand."

Second Point: Crypto Has Lost Its Growth Market

The old OG said the biggest problem with Crypto isn’t actually technology.

It’s that the narrative has透支 (overdrawn) the future.

Over the past decade, the one thing Crypto projects have been best at is: manufacturing expectations.

Every new narrative is grand: Web3, Metaverse, GameFi, SocialFi, DeFi—each story sounds like it’s going to rebuild the world.

The problem is, the technical capabilities of the vast majority of projects can’t support these narratives.

So a classic thing happened: expectations were severely透支 (overdrawn).

Users came in, time and again.

And were disappointed, time and again.

Slowly, it became a story everyone is familiar with:

The boy who cried wolf.

When the market stops believing your story, new users disappear.

The biggest problem with Crypto isn’t actually the bear market.

It’s that:

No new people are coming in.

Third Point: The Community Stopped Believing Long Ago

The old OG said many Crypto communities nowadays are quite interesting.

On the surface, everyone is enthusiastic, posting in groups daily: GM, WAGMI, To the moon

But in reality, many core participants are well aware of one thing:

They don’t even believe in this narrative themselves.

The function of the community gradually devolved into one thing:

Downward compatibility with new retail investors.


Using a bunch of jargon:

Tokenomics/Layer2/Modular/Restaking/Intent/etc

To surround new entrants.

Many newcomers don’t really understand what these terms mean.

But in such an atmosphere, people easily get brainwashed.

The old OG said this is essentially a form of narrative engineering.

But the problem is, those setting up the game know it’s a game too.

So everyone is waiting for the right moment:

Sell on the high.


This creates a vicious cycle:

Keep telling new stories → Attract new people → Pump the price → Cash out → Tell new stories again.

In the long run, the entire market’s credit gets透支 (overdrawn).

Fourth Point: Financialization Rushed Before Technical Maturity

The old OG said Crypto has another fatal flaw. Financialization started before the technical phase was complete. The normal path of technological development should be:

First, build the "infrastructure."

Then, develop "applications."

Finally, comes "financialization."


But Crypto took the reverse route:

Issue tokens first.

Do finance first.

Focus on trading first.

Patch up the technology slowly.


The result is: Many things weren’t even mature yet but were already priced by the capital market.

Once the real capabilities can’t keep up with the price,

Projects continuously get disproven.

The market might forgive it once or twice.

But when disproval becomes the norm, trust vanishes.

Fifth Point: Attention is Fleeing Crypto, Unnoticed

Finally, he mentioned something many haven’t realized: Human attention is migrating.

Over the past decade, the biggest attention structure on the internet was:

Human-to-human interaction, social media, communities, DAOs.


But a shift is happening now:

More and more attention is turning towards

Human-AI interaction.

Look where people spend their time now: not in Telegram groups, not on Discord.

But talking to AI.


When the structure of attention migrates,

Many ecosystems that originally relied on community heat,

Will naturally decline.

Crypto is largely an

Attention-driven market. When attention decreases, growth naturally disappears.

As the dinner was ending, someone asked:

"So do you think Crypto is finished?"

The old OG thought for a moment and said something很有意思 (interesting):

"Crypto isn’t finished, but this generation’s narrative has ended."


Then he added:

"The real problem was never scamming retail investors."

Financial markets will always scam retail investors.

Stocks do it, forex does it, AI will do it in the future too.

Scamming isn’t the problem.

Having no new retail investors is the problem.


He said the biggest tragedy of Crypto is actually very simple:

When the technology wasn’t mature,

They told twenty years’ worth of stories

In just three years.

The stories are finished.

And so the people disperse.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7619255

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the core concept emphasized in Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin whitepaper instead of 'decentralization'?

AThe core concept emphasized in the whitepaper is 'Distributed' (mentioned about 6 times) and the key problem it aims to solve is to 'remove the need for a trusted third party' (distributed trust structure).

QWhat does the article identify as the main reason for Crypto's decline, beyond just 'cutting leeks' (scamming investors)?

AThe main reasons are: the underlying logic is flawed, narrative has outpaced technical reality, loss of incremental market/new users, premature financialization before technical maturity, and migration of human attention to AI interactions.

QHow does the article describe the current state of many Crypto communities regarding their belief in the projects?

AThe article states that many core participants in Crypto communities don't actually believe in the narratives themselves. Communities have become primarily focused on 'downward compatibility with new韭菜 (newbies)' - using complex terminology to encircle and onboard new entrants while waiting for the right time to sell high.

QWhat problematic development pattern does the article highlight regarding Crypto's technological and financial progression?

ACrypto followed a reverse development path: it financialized first (issuing tokens, enabling trading) before the underlying technology was mature, rather than building infrastructure first, then applications, and finally financialization. This led to assets being priced by the market before their real capabilities were proven, resulting in constant disproof and loss of trust.

QWhat major shift in human attention does the article suggest is negatively impacting Crypto market?

AHuman attention is migrating from human-to-human interactions (social media, communities, DAOs) to human-to-AI interactions. As Crypto is an attention-driven market, this reduction in attention leads to a natural decline and loss of incremental users.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit4m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit4m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片