Tether-backed Northern Data sold mining firm to Tether execs: FT

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-22Last updated on 2025-12-22

Abstract

Northern Data, a Tether-backed data center operator, sold its Bitcoin mining business, Peak Mining, for up to $200 million to three companies run by Tether executives, including its co-founder and CEO. The sale occurred just before Rumble, a video-sharing platform in which Tether holds a major stake, agreed to acquire Northern Data. This is the second attempt to sell the mining unit to a Tether-linked entity. Northern Data is under investigation in Europe for suspected tax fraud and has a complex financial relationship with Tether, including a €610 million loan. The sale highlights Tether's expanding interests beyond stablecoins into mining, AI, and other ventures.

The Tether-backed data centre operator Northern Data reportedly sold its Bitcoin mining business, Peak Mining, to three companies run by Tether executives.

Northern Data was sold for up to $200 million to Highland Group Mining, Appalachian Energy, and an Alberta-based company, run by Giancarlo Devasini, Tether co-founder and chair, and its CEO, Paolo Ardoino, the Financial Times reported on Friday.

Filings reportedly show that Highland Group’s directors are Devasini and Ardoino, and the sole director of the Alberta company is Devasini, while it remains unclear who runs Delaware-based Appalachian Energy.

Northern Data initially announced the Peak Mining divestment in November, but did not identify the buyers, as it was not required by German regulators.

The deal also happened just before video-sharing platform Rumble, in which Tether holds nearly a 50% stake, agreed to acquire Northern Data.

*Tether’s complex web of financial ties. Source:* *The Financial Times*

Web of complex financial ties

It is also the second attempt to sell Peak Mining to a Devasini-controlled company. The first deal announced in August was with Elektron Energy for $235 million, but it fell through amid whistleblower allegations.

Northern Data faces investigation by European prosecutors for suspected tax fraud, and its offices were raided in September.

Related: Tether deepens AI bet, backs Italian firm’s humanoid robots

Tether has also agreed on a $100 million advertising deal with Rumble and plans to buy $150 million worth of GPU services from it as it delves deeper into Bitcoin mining.

Northern Data also currently has a 610 million euro ($715 million) loan from Tether.

The stablecoin issuer will receive half of the loan balance in Rumble stock as part of the acquisition, with the rest paid in the form of a new loan from Tether to Rumble, secured against Northern Data assets, the FT reported.

Tether branching out from stablecoins

Tether remains the world’s dominant player in the stablecoin sector with a 60% market share and $187 billion in circulating supply of USDT.

In addition to Bitcoin mining, AI, and video-sharing platforms, it is also eyeing sports teams.

On December 12, Tether launched a $1.1 billion bid to acquire the Italian professional soccer club, Juventus Football Club, but it was rejected by the club’s owners.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

How Will the US Treasury Bond Buyback Affect Bitcoin? Here Are Analysts' Opinions

The potential expansion of the U.S. Treasury's bond-buyback program could positively influence Bitcoin's price trajectory, according to analyst Mark Connors of Risk Dimensions. He suggests that if the program eases pressure on long-term U.S. Treasury yields, it may create favorable macro conditions for Bitcoin, potentially accelerating its path toward a current cycle target of $180,000. In the long term, under favorable conditions, Bitcoin could reach a range between $180,000 and $360,000. Macroeconomic factors like Treasury yields, monetary policy expectations, and global liquidity increasingly drive Bitcoin's price movements. U.S. debt management policy is therefore closely watched by the crypto market. Connors also highlights the upcoming U.S. CLARITY Act, aimed at crypto regulation, as a key short-term catalyst. Any regulatory progress, especially before mid-September, could boost institutional interest in Bitcoin. Analysts conclude that Bitcoin's next potential rally may depend not only on crypto-specific events but also on broader U.S. economic and debt management policies.

cryptonews.ru8m ago

How Will the US Treasury Bond Buyback Affect Bitcoin? Here Are Analysts' Opinions

cryptonews.ru8m ago

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

Grayscale Research suggests a third wave of public focus on financial privacy is approaching, driven by stablecoin/blockchain adoption and new AI-powered surveillance tools. In this context, Zcash emerges as a decentralized digital currency, similar to Bitcoin but with built-in, robust privacy mechanisms via its "shielded" transactions that conceal sender, receiver, and amount using zero-knowledge proofs. While privacy is often seen as a niche feature, it is argued to be a core requirement for functional money, needed by individuals and businesses alike. Zcash's optional privacy is distinct from mixers or default-private chains like Monero. After years of development (Sapling, Orchard/NU5, Ironwood upgrades) to improve usability, key metrics show growing adoption: shielded transactions comprise ~90% of network activity, and ~25% of circulating ZEC is in shielded pools—a historical high. Despite this, ZEC's market valuation remains low (~0.6% of the "digital currency" sector), implying the market prices privacy as a marginal concern. The investment thesis hinges on a potential re-rating if the value of financial privacy is recognized more broadly. Risks include regulatory challenges around shielded transactions, legacy trusted setup pools, quantum computing threats, and execution risks for upcoming upgrades like Tachyon for scaling. In summary, Zcash represents a significant, technologically mature option in the privacy currency space, with current valuation offering potential upside if privacy demand grows.

marsbit14m ago

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

marsbit14m ago

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

**Title: Bear Market Over, New Bull Cycle Begins** Bitcoin surged over 20% in just three days, from a low of $64,100 on August 19th to a high of $79,500 by August 21st, marking a dramatic shift in market sentiment. This rapid rise triggered massive liquidations exceeding $4 billion, with short positions accounting for $3.7 billion—the largest short squeeze since 2021. The rally was fueled by several key factors. Macroeconomic conditions improved as the US Treasury doubled its long-term bond buyback size, easing pressure. Significant regulatory developments included a White House meeting where former President Trump urged Senate action on the CLARITY Act and hinted at potential US Bitcoin reserves, followed by the CFTC Chairman stating the agency would establish crypto market rules if the bill stalls. On-chain data revealed a fierce battle: large whales faced substantial liquidations on short positions, while others took profits or doubled down on longs. Major altcoins like ETH and XRP also saw impressive gains. Analysts are divided but increasingly bullish. Many, including CryptoQuant's founder, declare the bear market over and a new bull cycle begun. Price targets range from $100k by year-end to ambitious long-term projections of $200k. However, some caution against immediate chasing, noting overbought conditions and viewing the move as a potential "trap" ahead of the crucial September 15th Senate vote on the CLARITY Act. The market's next test is sustaining the momentum with real buying pressure, holding above key resistance near $78k-$80k, and watching ETF inflows and the upcoming regulatory vote.

marsbit18m ago

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

marsbit18m ago

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

Xiaomi's Q2 2026 financial report reveals a company navigating a complex transition. While smartphone gross margin held steady at 8.5% through strategic product mix and a record-high average selling price (ASP), this came at the cost of a 26.5% year-over-year decline in global shipments, pressuring its core user acquisition engine. This illustrates Xiaomi's central challenge: managing the "timing gap" between its established and emerging growth engines. Its smartphone business is pivoting from scale to premiumization, but it's unclear if high-end models can fully offset the volume loss from more price-sensitive segments, especially in markets like India and Africa. Meanwhile, the electric vehicle segment has become a significant revenue contributor, delivering 104,200 units and generating ¥23.9 billion. However, its profit contribution remains unclear as it, along with AI investments, is still in a scaling and investment phase. The AI and humanoid robot initiatives, though strategically prioritized and tested in Xiaomi's own factories, are in early-stage validation with no near-term commercialization timeline. Financially, the company remains stable, supported by a robust cash position and its high-margin internet services business, which hit a new high in monthly active users. Management emphasized continued heavy investment in AI, chips, and robotics to fuel the next growth cycle. The key question is whether these new engines—cars, AI, robotics—can achieve commercial scale and profitability before the smartphone engine's growth slows further.

marsbit19m ago

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

marsbit19m ago

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbit40m ago