Surging and Warning Signs Appear Simultaneously: Is SHIB Building Up for a Big Move? ADA Flatlines with Warning, BEAT Soars 480% but Hides Risks, ZEC Holds Firm at $400

金色财经Published on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

The cryptocurrency market is currently showing mixed signals with significant divergence across major tokens. SHIB appears to be consolidating after months of decline, showing signs of reduced selling pressure and potential accumulation by large holders. Key indicators like RSI suggest building momentum, though it remains under its moving averages. ZEC is struggling, down 3.82%, and is heavily reliant on holding the crucial $400 support level. Its performance is being dragged down by the broader privacy coin sector. A break above $425 is needed to signal a potential bullish trend reversal. ADA has triggered a major bearish signal with its weekly SuperTrend indicator turning negative—a similar signal in 2022 preceded an 80% crash. It has already retreated from $0.48 to $0.40, indicating strong downward pressure. BEAT has been an outlier, surging 480% in 30 days due to high speculative interest, AI-driven token burns, and extreme scarcity (only 16% of supply in circulation). However, it faces strong resistance at its all-time high of $3, and indicators like MACD show buying momentum cooling, suggesting a potential pullback toward $2.40 or even $1.25. Overall, the market is highly fragmented. Caution is advised—watch key support and resistance levels before making moves.

The crypto world is now directly上演 "some are building momentum while others panic"! SHIB appears to be lying flat but is actually quietly蓄力, ZEC is holding firm at the $400关口, ADA has triggered a danger signal, and only BEAT is疯狂蹦迪 with a 480% surge. This剧情 is more exciting than a TV drama~

? SHIB: Pretending to Slack Off, Are Big Players Secretly Accumulating?

Shiba Inu is主打 "deceptive operations" this time! On the surface, the price seems平平无奇, but it actually hides a key signal — after falling for several months, it's no longer accelerating downward but instead starting to "横盘压缩". This isn't a sign of weakness; it's selling pressure slowly decreasing!

The most crucial point is the "volume-price divergence": the price drops slightly, but the trading volume doesn't follow at all. The recent几次下跌的成交量 is much weaker than during the previous抛售. Technically, it's even more interesting: although the long-term trend is still bearish, there are already "higher lows", indicating that big players aren't chasing the decline but are instead secretly布局 during low market sentiment and low volatility.

QQ:326035359

DingTalk:msp252580

The RSI indicator is also in the neutral zone, not oversold but showing signs of increasing momentum. The bears haven't succeeded in smashing it down completely. However,普通交易者 are still panicking, as the moving averages are still压制在上面. To summarize: SHIB is now in "蓄力模式". As long as the volume放大 and it holds the recent highs and lows, it might suddenly reverse and rise!

?️ ZEC: Holding Firm at $400! Privacy Coin Sector Drags It Down, Needs to Break $425 for Prospects

The privacy coin leader ZEC is having a tough time! It fell 3.82% in the past 24 hours, didn't follow Bitcoin's rebound, and is being dragged down by the entire privacy coin sector — Monero fell 0.89%, and Dash was even worse, falling 14.5% in four days. Truly, "teammates aren't helping".

Fortunately, the psychological support level at $400 is still holding strong. It has been tested three times in the past week and held. Moreover, after breaking through $409.3 on December 9th, the area around $410 has become a stable demand zone. OBV and RSI also hint at a shift.

But the problems are also obvious: selling pressure on lower time frames is intensifying, and多次测试支撑 has weakened its strength. A break below $400 is not impossible.

QQ:326035359

DingTalk:msp252580

Don't rush to go long! Wait for ZEC to break through the local resistance at $425 and successfully retest and hold above it before considering the trend aligned. Otherwise, remain neutral and wait for improved Bitcoin capital inflows and better market sentiment~

? ADA: SuperTrend Turns Bearish! Last Time This Happened, It Fell 80%, Are You Worried Now?

ADA has triggered a "danger signal" this time! Analyst Ali Martinez revealed that the weekly "SuperTrend indicator" for ADA has turned bearish — this indicator is a key line for judging rises and falls; price above it is bullish, below it is bearish.

Even scarier is that the last time ADA showed this signal was in 2022, and it directly fell 80%! And it's not just ADA; Bitcoin's SuperTrend has also turned bearish. The last time this happened was during the bear market, and BTC fell 60%.

Now ADA is even worse. It just反弹到 $0.48 last week, then turned around and fell back to $0.40. This downtrend is likely to continue.

? BEAT: Meme Coin Surges 480%! AI Burning + Scarcity, But Hides a Correction Risk?

The new sensation on BNB Chain, BEAT, has gone crazy! It's only been listed for a month, surged 84% in 24 hours, and累计暴涨 480% in the past 30 days, directly rushing into the top 100 by market cap. In a weak market, it's like "a breath of fresh air".

Why such a猛 surge? Three key points:

1. Speculative sentiment is maxed out, with $20 million in volume on DEX platforms alone, and nearly 7000 more buyers than sellers;

2. Scarce circulating supply, only 16% of the total supply — scarcity drives value;

3. AI-driven token burning, plus integrated AI payments, reducing supply while generating income, maximizing deflationary pressure.

But don't blindly FOMO in! BEAT encountered resistance when冲击 the $3 all-time high. Capital is starting to flow out, the MACD shows buying cooling down, and more liquidity is聚集 below. If the bulls run out of steam, it could fall towards $2.40 (where there is $1 million in leverage liquidations below) or even retest the $1.25 support level that hasn't been broken in three tests. If you want to chase, wait for it to successfully break through the all-time high~

To summarize: SHIB is building momentum waiting for a reversal, ZEC is guarding $400 watching for a break above $425, ADA is警惕大跌风险, and BEAT has surged but has significant回调隐患. The crypto circle is now severely分化. Don't blindly follow the trend; keep a close eye on key levels before making a move!QQ:3260353596

DingTalk:msp252580

Related Questions

QWhat is the current technical pattern of SHIB, and what does it indicate?

ASHIB is currently in a 'sideways compression' pattern, which indicates that selling pressure is decreasing. Despite a long-term downtrend, it has formed higher lows, suggesting that large players are accumulating positions quietly rather than selling off.

QWhat key support level is ZEC defending, and what condition is needed for a bullish trend?

AZEC is defending the $400 psychological support level. A bullish trend would require a break above the local resistance at $425, followed by a successful retest and hold above that level.

QWhat bearish signal has appeared for ADA, and what historical precedent is associated with it?

AADA's weekly SuperTrend indicator has turned bearish. Historically, the last time this occurred in 2022, ADA's price declined by 80%.

QWhat are the main reasons behind BEAT's 480% price surge in 30 days?

ABEAT's surge is driven by speculative sentiment (with 2000万美元 volume on DEXs), scarcity (only 16% of total supply in circulation), and AI-driven token burns combined with AI payment integrations, creating deflationary pressure.

QWhat risks are associated with BEAT's current price action despite its significant gains?

ABEAT faces resistance near its all-time high of $3, with signs of capital outflow and cooling buying momentum. If buyers weaken, it could correct towards $2.40 (where $1 million in leverage may be liquidated) or even retest the $1.25 support level.

Related Reads

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, processes near-Nasdaq-level perpetual trading volumes but captures significantly lower fees compared to centralized platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood. While Hyperliquid cleared $205.6 billion in notional volume over 30 days, it generated only $80.3 million in fees—an effective take rate of ~3.9 bps. In contrast, Coinbase and Robinhood achieve take rates of ~35.5 bps and ~33.5 bps, respectively, by operating as retail brokers that monetize multiple layers: distribution, balances, subscriptions, and order flow. This gap stems from a structural difference: Hyperliquid positions itself as a low-fee *market layer* (like Nasdaq), providing high-throughput execution and清算 infrastructure, while brokers like Coinbase control user relationships and extract value through higher-margin activities. Hyperliquid’s model includes permissionless distributor frontends (Builder Codes) and product deployment (HIP-3), which drive ecosystem growth but also create long-term fee compression risks by outsourcing high-value distribution. To defend its economics, Hyperliquid is taking steps to retain distribution control, integrate HIP-3 markets natively, and introduce balance-driven revenue streams like USDH (a native stablecoin with 50% reserve收益 sharing) and portfolio margin (10% interest fee on borrows). These moves aim to shift its model from pure exchange-level execution toward a hybrid approach that captures broker-like profit pools—without sacrificing its core infrastructure advantages. The key challenge remains balancing open ecosystem growth with tighter economic integration to avoid being commoditized as a wholesale execution venue.

marsbit7m ago

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

marsbit7m ago

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

The 2025 public blockchain landscape reveals a stark divide between hype and reality, with a severe concentration of value and widespread "zombification" of projects. Analysis of DeFiLlama's on-chain fee data exposes a critical structural issue: the crypto space is dominated by a "profit concentration and long-tail zombie" era. Notable examples highlight this crisis. Algorand, a chain with a $1 billion market cap and advanced technology, generated a mere $17 in daily fees, while Cardano, a top-10 asset, saw only around $6,000. These "classic chains" are likened to empty, expensive cities with no real economic activity. The biggest value capturers are not the most technologically elegant chains. Tron leads with $1.24 million in daily fees, succeeding as a low-cost payment rail for USDT transfers—crypto's only true mass-adoption use case. Solana ($600k daily) thrives as a high-frequency casino for meme coins and speculation, and Base ($105k daily) demonstrates that distribution (via Coinbase) is more critical than pure technology. The only validated business models generating significant fees are low-cost payments, high-frequency speculation, and, to a lesser extent, Ethereum's asset settlement layer. The VC-driven model is failing. New chains like Sui, Sei, and Starknet, which raised hundreds of millions, show a severe disconnect between their high valuations and meager daily fee revenue (ranging from $320 to $12,000). Their lifecycle often follows a "pump and dump" pattern: VC funding -> airdrop farming -> token listing -> user exodus -> collapsed on-chain activity. The industry suffers from a massive oversupply of block space with a dire lack of killer applications. The article concludes that investors must shift from valuing narratives to scrutinizing financials. They should avoid "zombie coins" with high valuations and negligible fees, focus on chains with organic, fee-generating demand, acknowledge that distribution and community are now more valuable than pure tech, and see through the VC subsidy game. This is a necessary market correction; only by paying for real, generated value—not promised future stories—can the industry achieve healthy growth.

比推34m ago

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

比推34m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of A (A) are presented below.

活动图片