Supporting Roles and Below May Use AI Actors, Director Yu Zheng Claims Real Performance Cannot Be Replaced by Technology

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-18Last updated on 2026-03-18

Abstract

Recent discussions about "replacing supporting and minor roles with AI actors" have sparked heated debates on social platforms, indicating that generative AI technology is now moving beyond special effects and entering the core of character portrayal in film and television production. Prominent screenwriter Yu Zheng has publicly responded, emphasizing the irreplaceable value of real human performance. While AI actors, powered by digital generation technology, are already performing complex actions and creating unique character appearances—particularly in short-form dramas where they significantly reduce costs and shorten production cycles—their limitations are becoming increasingly clear. AI still struggles to convey emotional depth and a sense of humanity, and audiences often find it difficult to form genuine emotional connections with digital characters. This trend reflects an ongoing tension between technology and art in the industry. As Yu Zheng noted, AI may represent a temporary trend that filters out mediocre output, but true creative expression still relies on human thought and emotion. As both digital models and human performances continue to coexist, the industry must confront the challenge of balancing technological efficiency with artistic and emotional authenticity.

Recently, the discussion about "using AI actors for supporting roles and below" has topped the trending list on social platforms, marking that the penetration of generative AI technology into the film and television production process has deeply advanced from special effects assistance to character replacement. Prominent screenwriter Yu Zheng publicly responded to this, emphasizing the irreplaceability of real performances.

Currently, AI actors, leveraging digital generation technology, can perform high-difficulty actions and create special character images, demonstrating significant cost reduction and efficiency improvement in short film production, greatly shortening development cycles. However, the limitations behind the technological benefits are increasingly evident: digital algorithms still lack the ability to convey emotional depth and the warmth of life, and the audience's psychological defense mechanisms make it difficult for AI images to establish emotional resonance among peers.

This trend reflects that the film and television industry is in a period of intense friction between technology and art. As Yu Zheng stated, AI may be a temporary trend; it serves more as a screening mechanism to eliminate mediocre output, while the core of creation still needs to return to human thought and emotions. In the current era where digital models and real performances coexist, how to balance technological leverage and humanistic care has become an issue the industry must face directly.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main topic of the article that sparked online discussion?

AThe main topic is the proposal to use AI actors for supporting roles (specifically 'male second lead and below') in film and television productions.

QWhat is director Yu Zheng's stance on the use of AI actors?

ADirector Yu Zheng believes that real human performance is irreplaceable and cannot be substituted by technology.

QWhat are two main advantages of using AI actors mentioned in the article?

AThe two main advantages are significant cost reduction and efficiency improvement, as well as the ability to perform difficult actions and create special character appearances.

QWhat key limitation does AI technology currently face in acting, according to the article?

AThe key limitation is that digital algorithms lack the ability to convey emotional depth and a sense of life's warmth, making it difficult for AI characters to establish emotional resonance with audiences.

QHow does the article describe the current state of the film and television industry regarding this technology?

AThe article describes the industry as being in a period of intense friction between technology and art, where it must confront the challenge of balancing technological leverage with humanistic care.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit6m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit6m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit6m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit6m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit16m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit16m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片