Strong jobs report shakes the market – Could Bitcoin drop below $60K next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-12Last updated on 2026-02-12

Abstract

The strong January U.S. jobs report, which far exceeded expectations, has significantly impacted market sentiment and expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The probability of a near-term cut fell sharply, increasing volatility. This shift is particularly relevant for Bitcoin, which dipped following the data release. The article argues this reinforces the importance of the upcoming March FOMC meeting in setting the tone for risk assets. Technically, Bitcoin is described as fragile, trapped in a volatile range between $65k and $70k. It has repeatedly failed to turn key resistance levels into support, putting pressure on its current floor. This setup, combined with the macro uncertainty over interest rates, reduces the incentive for short-term holders to remain invested. The mounting headwinds increase the likelihood of a wave of selling (capitulation), which could break the $65k support level and put the $60k threshold at risk.

The March FOMC meeting carries added weight this year. After a bearish Q1, in which high-cap assets logged their weakest quarterly returns in years, this meeting is likely to set the tone for risk assets heading into Q2.

Recent data seemed to reinforce that significance. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U.S added 130k jobs in January, far above the 55k expected, while the unemployment rate fell to 4.3% – Beating forecasts of 4.4%.

In short, the labor market came in “stronger than expected,” reinforcing the idea that investors had been pricing in slower growth. Bitcoin’s [BTC] 2.54% dip following the release was further evidence of this shift in expectations.

Notably, the repricing didn’t stop there. The probability of a near-term rate cut fell sharply, from 20.1% before the data release to 6.4% at press time, highlighting how quickly sentiment adjusted to firmer economic signals.

However, the question remains – Has sentiment truly adjusted? Well, U.S. President Donald Trump welcomed the report, saying it could lower the country’s interest burden and support a more balanced fiscal outlook.

Skeptics, however, took a different positon. The Kobeissi Letter argued that “the Fed pause will continue,” arguing that a strong labor market reduces the urgency for rate cuts and keeps monetary policy restrictive for longer.

In short, volatility around rate-cut expectations remains.

On one hand, this reinforces AMBCrypto’s view that the March FOMC carries added weight. The bigger question for Bitcoin, however, is whether this uncertainty will weaken its ability to hold the prevailing tight range.

Bitcoin remains fragile against mounting macro headwinds

A textbook volatility-trap setup can be seen for Bitcoin.

This week, BTC has been chopping between $65k–$70k, a range that usually reflects speculative positioning as traders bet on the next move. Notably, BTC’s long/short ratio flipped negative over the same period.

Technically, this could be a sign of crowded short-term positioning. If bulls defend this range, a squeeze could push BTC towarda higher resistance. That said, STHs have been losing patience, with BTC still trading 30% below their cost basis.

In setups like this, holding support is critical to avoid a wave of capitulation. However, key factors suggest the road ahead will be challenging, with rate-cut volatility standing out as a major bearish catalyst.

Meanwhile, on the technical side, fragility remains clear. Bitcoin has twice failed to flip resistance into support since the January peak of $97k. First around $85k–$90k, then near $75k, which puts pressure on the $65k-floor.

Taken together, this setup clearly reduces the incentive for STHs to hold. Instead, with volatility still elevated, capitulation will be increasingly likely, raising the odds of Bitcoin breaking the third floor and putting the $60k-level at risk.


Final Thoughts

  • Strong January jobs data pushed markets to repricing rate-cut expectations, increasing volatility and uncertainty for Bitcoin.
  • Bitcoin remains technically fragile, with repeated resistance failures heightening the risk of capitulation.

Related Questions

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the stronger-than-expected January jobs report, specifically for Bitcoin?

ABitcoin's price dipped by 2.54% following the release of the jobs report.

QHow did the probability of a near-term Fed rate cut change after the jobs data was released?

AThe probability of a near-term rate cut fell sharply from 20.1% before the data release to 6.4%.

QWhat is the 'textbook volatility-trap setup' mentioned for Bitcoin, and what is the key price range?

AThe volatility-trap setup refers to Bitcoin chopping between the $65k–$70k range, which reflects speculative positioning as traders bet on the next move.

QAccording to the article, what is a major bearish catalyst creating challenges for Bitcoin's price?

ARate-cut volatility is highlighted as a major bearish catalyst creating challenges for Bitcoin's price.

QWhat are the two key technical failures that have put pressure on Bitcoin's $65k support floor?

ABitcoin failed to flip the $85k–$90k resistance into support after its January peak, and it subsequently failed to flip the $75k level into support.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片