Strategy stock bleeds as MSCI verdict nears – What next for MSTR?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-30Last updated on 2025-12-30

Abstract

MicroStrategy (MSTR) stock hit a new yearly low of $155.32, down 71% from its 2024 high. The decline is driven by concerns over a potential MSCI index delisting in early 2026, which could trigger $8 billion in outflows. Additionally, the company has been selling MSTR stock to fund Bitcoin purchases, issuing $4.9 billion in common stock with $4 billion sold below its mNAV ratio of 1, contrary to its earlier guidance. Despite a $22.5 billion BTC spend in 2025 and a total holding of 672,497 BTC, the stock faces dilution pressure. However, Wall Street analysts maintain a bullish outlook, with 13 recent buy ratings and price targets up to $485, implying over 200% upside potential.

Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, saw its stock drop to a fresh yearly low. Following a broader tech sell-off on the 29th of December, MSTR stock dropped by 2.15% to a record 2025 low of $155.32.

From its 2024 high of $543, MSTR has crashed by 71%, presenting several Wall Street bears with a windfall opportunity.

Although some bears began unwinding short positions in November to realize their gains, MSTR’s free fall did not slow down. At press time, the stock was back within the 2024 price range of $100-$180.

Strategy stock bearish drivers

One of the factors driving bearish sentiment over the past few weeks has been the risk of MSCI index delisting MSTR and other crypto treasury firms.

Although the Strategy founder, Michael Saylor, has defended the firm as an operational company that should remain on the global index, prediction site Polymarket was pricing a +75% chance of delisting in early 2026.

JPMorgan analysts warned that such a move would drive $8 billion in outflows from the stock.

Some even speculated that the delisting would force liquidation of its Bitcoin holdings, but market expectations for such a BTC sell-off remained low.

The MSCI decision in mid-January could offer the needed clarity for the stock’s next direction.

MSTR dilution

Additionally, the ongoing dilution through MSTR stock sales to fund Bitcoin [BTC] purchases may have contributed to the stock’s pressure.

According to analyst Novacula Occami, Strategy sold $4 billion worth of MSTR despite its BTC holdings trading below its enterprise value, or mNAV, being below 1.

“Since that July announcement, they’ve issued $4.9 billion of $MSTR common with $4 billion of that issued at a common mNAV below 1 (in Nov and Dec).”

The firm had earlier stated that it wouldn’t sell the common stock (MSTR) if the mNAV fell below 2.5x, then changed it to 1x.

Overall, Strategy has spent $22.5 billion to buy Bitcoin in 2025. This was nearly half of its +$50 billion investment in BTC since 2020.

This has been funded by MSTR and preferred stock sales, as well as debt. In fact, the latest $108 million BTC buy was wholly funded by MSTR stock sales. Strategy now owns 672,497 BTC.

That said, despite the massive dump in 2025, Wall Street analysts were still bullish on MSTR stock. There were 13 buy ratings in the past month, with price targets ranging from $465 to $485, implying a 170%-200% upside potential.


Final Thoughts

  • MSTR printed fresh yearly lows at $155 following a massive dump in H2 2025.
  • Still, Wall Street analysts projected a 200% upside potential for the stock.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason for the bearish sentiment around MSTR stock in recent weeks?

AThe main bearish driver was the risk of MSCI index delisting MSTR and other crypto treasury firms, which could potentially drive significant outflows from the stock.

QHow much has MSTR's stock price fallen from its 2024 high to the new low mentioned in the article?

AMSTR's stock has crashed by 71% from its 2024 high of $543 to a new low of $155.32.

QWhat significant action has Strategy (MicroStrategy) taken to fund its Bitcoin purchases, contributing to stock price pressure?

AStrategy has been diluting its stock through MSTR stock sales to fund Bitcoin purchases, including $4.9 billion worth of common stock issued, with $4 billion of that issued at a mNAV below 1.

QWhat is the market's predicted chance of MSCI delisting MSTR in early 2026, according to Polymarket?

APrediction site Polymarket was pricing a +75% chance of delisting for MSTR in early 2026.

QDespite the massive price dump, what is Wall Street's overall sentiment and projected upside for MSTR stock?

AWall Street analysts remained bullish, with 13 buy ratings in the past month and price targets ranging from $465 to $485, implying a 170%-200% upside potential.

Related Reads

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit23m ago

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit23m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit25m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片