"Stock Market Maestro" Trump Lifts Up the Entire Quantum Computing Sector

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-05-27Last updated on 2026-05-27

Abstract

U.S. President Trump's administration, adopting an "active investor" approach, has announced $2 billion in funding for nine quantum computing companies in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes. The funding, sourced from the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, targets firms like IBM, GlobalFoundries, D-Wave, Rigetti, and several private companies to advance various quantum modalities and overcome key engineering hurdles. This move mirrors the administration's earlier strategic investments, such as the highly profitable stake in Intel, and shifts from pure subsidies to an equity-for-funding model under the same legislation. The announcement triggered significant stock gains for the quantum sector. The strategy is part of a broader "America First" industrial policy aimed at securing U.S. technological leadership, reducing foreign dependencies, and providing credibility and policy support alongside capital. The administration indicates continued openness to similar investments across semiconductors, critical minerals, defense, and other strategic sectors.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

Last August, driven by Trump, the U.S. government converted funds through the "Chips Act," directly purchasing nearly 10% of Intel's newly issued shares (approximately 433.3 million shares) at $20.47 per share. At that time, it was worth less than $9 billion; by early May, less than a year later, as Intel's stock price hit a record high, the total value of these shares had reached $54.1 billion, appreciating by over $45 billion in just seven months.

Mentioning this, Trump couldn't hide his pride and posted: "I made America $45 billion in the last 8 months."

As a capital maestro who doesn't hesitate to "move the stock market by posting," Trump exerts an extraordinary influence on the rise and fall of U.S. stocks. Recently, he has started his performance again—providing a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce in exchange for equity. Odaily Planet Daily will provide a brief analysis in this article.

U.S. Government Acts Again, Investing $2 Billion in Quantum Computing

On May 21, the Trump administration announced it would provide a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce, in exchange for partial equity. The specific allocation plan is as follows:

  • $1 billion will be granted to IBM (IBM) for the operation and development of its independent subsidiary, Anderon;
  • $375 million is allocated to chip manufacturer GlobalFoundries (GFS);
  • Publicly listed companies D-Wave (QBTS), Infleqtion (INFQ), Rigetti (RGTI) each receive $100 million;
  • Private companies Atom Computing, PsiQuantum, Quantinuum (an independent subsidiary of Honeywell-HON) each receive $100 million;
  • Startup Diraq is expected to receive $38 million.

According to official documents, this is part of the Trump administration's "active investor" industrial policy, with funding sourced from the R&D allocation of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. The Commerce Department emphasized that this is a "portfolio" strategy, covering two quantum wafer foundries and 7 quantum computing companies. It targets various quantum modalities including neutral atom, silicon spin, superconducting, photonic, and trapped ion, addressing key engineering bottlenecks such as device reproducibility, error rates, optical complexity, and cryogenic system integration.

On the day the news was released, the U.S. stock quantum computing sector surged sharply at the market open. Among them, D-Wave Quantum rose 16%, Rigetti Computing rose 14%, Infleqtion's stock rose 25%, Quantum Computing rose 9%, and IonQ rose 3.1%.

It's worth mentioning that among these companies receiving funds, only GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) revealed that the equity swap ratio is about 1%. For other companies, whether public or private, it's a minority non-controlling equity stake, and the specific ratios have not been disclosed. Final ratios await formal agreement signing and SEC filing disclosure.

Capital Operations Under the "America First" Strategy

Looking closely at this "investment for equity" operation, it remains an action by the Trump administration under the "America First" strategy.

Previously, U.S. government investments in Intel (INTC), the only fully integrated U.S. rare earth producer MP Materials (MP), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Lithium Americas (LAC), U.S. Steel, and others were also strategic moves to maintain the advantage of the domestic semiconductor industry chain.

Especially the nearly $9 billion investment in Intel, the Trump administration explicitly stated that this move was to support domestic advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. and reduce reliance on TSMC. Therefore, the U.S. government's related holdings are passive, with no board seats, and no participation in the company's daily operations or management. They largely follow board votes on most matters.

However, the U.S. government's "equity investment" is not just financial support; it also includes credit endorsement and multi-faceted policy support (such as export licenses, tariff protection). Previously, Intel received strong support from U.S. Commerce Secretary Loutnik after obtaining the government investment. Over the past year, he has repeatedly met with Apple CEO Tim Cook, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, persuading them to cooperate with Intel. With Apple joining, Intel has now established relevant collaborations with all three companies mentioned above.

Shift in Operational Approach Under the CHIPS and Science Act: From Grants to Equity Swaps

The $2 billion in funding for quantum computing-related companies comes from the CHIPS and Science Act, a landmark bipartisan bill introduced by the U.S. government in 2022, officially named the "CHIPS and Science Act of 2022." The total authorized funding of the act is approximately $280 billion over 10 years, for supporting semiconductor industry development and basic science and technology R&D. Its main purpose is to revitalize U.S. semiconductor manufacturing, strengthen scientific research and innovation capabilities, and address competition from other countries in high-tech fields through large-scale investment.

But different from the grant or pure subsidy model during the Biden administration, the Trump administration's operational model is the aforementioned "active investor" model—switching to funding in exchange for minority non-controlling equity stakes. As of May this year, the act has attracted over $645 billion in private investment in semiconductor manufacturing, with over 140 projects and the creation of 525,000 new jobs.

It must be said, while personally calling shots and moving stocks like Dell (DELL), Micron (MU), and Palantir (PLTR), Trump is also promoting U.S. stock market prosperity in the name of U.S. government departments, which is why he repeatedly boasts, "The stock market highs are mainly because of me."

Additionally, it's worth noting that a previous investment announcement from the U.S. Department of Commerce stated, "The CHIPS Research and Development Office continues to solicit proposals from eligible applicants for research, prototyping, and commercial solutions for microelectronics technology in the United States. Eligible applicants should submit applications via Notice 2025-NIST-CHIPS-CRDO-01 on the www.grants.gov website." In other words, the U.S. government's "investment door" remains open. For more information and funding announcements, please refer to official sources.

Of course, the U.S. government invests in a wide range of company fields, also involving critical minerals like electricity and rare earths, new energy sources like lithium batteries, medical supplies, and communication infrastructure. Examples include Westinghouse Electric, Lithium Americas, Trilogy Metals, USA Rare Earth, Vulcan Elements, XLight, L3 Harris Technologies, etc.

Furthermore, U.S. Commerce Secretary Loutnik once revealed to the media that the current administration might take equity stakes in major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin (LMT).

In summary, the various publicly listed companies, critical mineral/rare earth/battery material supply chains, nuclear/small modular reactor (SMR) and advanced nuclear fuel, and other quantum computing targets mentioned above may become the focus of continued investment by the Trump administration in the second half of the year.

Related Questions

QWhat specific action did the Trump administration take to support the quantum computing sector, and how much funding was announced?

AOn May 21, the Trump administration announced that it would provide a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce, in exchange for partial equity stakes in those companies.

QWhich publicly listed quantum computing companies received $100 million each from the funding announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce?

AThe publicly listed quantum computing companies that each received $100 million are D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Infleqtion (INFQ), and Rigetti Computing (RGTI).

QWhat is the source of the $2 billion funding for the quantum computing companies, and how does this Trump-era approach differ from the previous administration's policy?

AThe $2 billion funding comes from the research and development appropriations of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. Unlike the Biden administration's approach of grants or pure subsidies, the Trump administration's model is that of an 'active investor,' providing funding in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes.

QAccording to the article, what was a key strategic reason behind the U.S. government's investment in Intel, and what terms govern its stake?

AA key strategic reason for the U.S. government's investment in Intel was to support advanced domestic semiconductor manufacturing and reduce dependence on TSMC. The government's stake is passive, meaning it holds no board seats, does not participate in daily operations, and generally follows the board's votes on most matters.

QWhat broader areas or sectors, beyond quantum computing, does the article suggest the U.S. government under Trump has invested in or may invest in?

ABeyond quantum computing, the article suggests the U.S. government has invested or may invest in areas including critical minerals/rare earths, battery materials, nuclear energy/Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), advanced nuclear fuel, electrical infrastructure, medical supplies, communications infrastructure, and major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin.

Related Reads

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

Claude Code introduces dynamic workflows, enabling AI to coordinate teams of specialized agents for complex tasks. This transforms Claude from a code assistant into a programmable workbench. Workflows address key limitations of single-agent systems: agentic laziness (premature task completion), self-preferential bias (favoring own outputs), and goal drift (losing sight of original objectives). The system allows Claude to dynamically create execution frameworks using JavaScript. It can split tasks, dispatch parallel agents for isolated work (e.g., in separate worktrees), implement adversarial validation, run tournaments, and synthesize results. This multi-agent approach is valuable for tasks requiring deep research, factual verification, code migration, root cause analysis, large-scale triage, and qualitative sorting. Key patterns include: classify-and-route, fan-out-and-synthesize, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter, tournaments, and loop-until-done. While token usage is higher, workflows excel where tasks resemble programming—needing problem decomposition, isolated context, hypothesis testing, and handling many details. They extend Claude Code's utility beyond technical work to areas like business plan review, resume screening, and naming brainstorm. The feature is not a universal solution but points to a future where AI tool competitiveness depends on organizing reliable, reusable, and auditable execution flows for complex goals.

marsbit2m ago

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

marsbit2m ago

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

Hyperliquid: The 24/7 Trading "Convenience Store" for Wall Street Hyperliquid, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange, has become a go-to platform for Wall Street traders seeking to trade around the clock, especially during traditional market closures. Founded by Jeff Yan, a former quantitative trader, after the FTX collapse, the platform emphasizes user self-custody of assets. It offers a wide range of perpetual contracts—leveraged derivatives with no expiry—on assets from Bitcoin and crude oil to the S&P 500 and even pre-IPO companies like SpaceX. A notable example involves a hedge fund trader who capitalized on geopolitical news over a weekend, securing a 243% return on oil derivatives before markets reopened. The platform, run by just 11 employees, generated approximately $800 million in revenue last year, and its native token HYPE has seen significant growth. Its rise highlights the merging of traditional finance and crypto. While U.S. users are currently restricted, recent CFTC rule changes could open access. The platform is known for its transparency, having processed $10 billion in liquidations during a market crash while competitors faltered. Regulators warn of the high risks and complexity of perpetual contracts for retail investors. Key to its appeal is a strong community culture, direct engagement with founders, and a simple interface. Despite rules against VPN use, it attracts global users with its permissionless approach. Hyperliquid plans to expand into prediction markets and options, aiming to eventually host all financial activity.

marsbit3m ago

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

marsbit3m ago

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit30m ago

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片