Stablecoin volumes surge to $35 trillion, but real-world payments still lag at 1%?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-25Last updated on 2026-01-25

Abstract

Stablecoin supply has grown 76x since 2020, surpassing $300 billion, yet real-world payments remain a small fraction of total activity. A report by Artemis and McKinsey reveals that while stablecoin volumes reached $35 trillion in 2025, only $390 billion (about 1%) was used for real-world transactions like remittances and payroll. The remaining 99% was tied to crypto trading and speculation. Key drivers of real-world stablecoin payments include B2B transactions, which grew 733% YoY to $226 billion, and card-linked spending, which surged 673%. However, these volumes are still minimal compared to the $2 quadrillion global payment market. Tether’s USDT led supply growth, increasing by $48 billion, while Circle’s USDC also saw significant expansion. The report suggests that stablecoin payments could surpass legacy systems within a decade due to their cost and speed advantages.

Since 2020, stablecoins have grown 76x and crossed $300 billion in supply. However, their volumes are still far from rivalling traditional payments.

According to a recent report by Artemis and McKinsey, on-chain dollars are “barely” scratching the surface of broader traditional payment volumes, accounting for less than 1%.

The report stated that global annual payment volumes totalled $2 quadrillion in 2025. Over the same period, stablecoin volumes hit $35 trillion, but real-world payment volumes (remittances, payroll, etc) was $390 billion or about 1% of global share.

The remaining 99% of the stablecoin volume was linked to crypto trading, speculation, internal transfers, and other activities rather than real-world transactions.

Sectors driving stablecoin growth

Even so, stablecoin payments have been growing rapidly, especially across business-to-business (B2B) and card-linked spending.

On a year-on-year (YoY) basis, B2B stablecoin payments climbed to $226 billion or a 733% growth rate. This has been the top driver for real-world stablecoin payment volumes.

Alas, this was just 0.01% compared to the global share of B2B transactions.

Peer-to-peer payments (P2P) or consumer-to-consumer transfers ranked second with $77 billion, followed closely by consumer-to-business (C2B) transactions at $76 billion.

On the contrary, business-to-consumer (B2C) activities such as payrolls, creator rewards, etc, were ranked last with a paltry $10 billion.

However, card-related spending in stablecoins exploded by 673% in 2025, making it, alongside B2B, one of two sectors seeing massive growth and likely opportunities for payment integrators.

Overall, the $390 billion figure differs from Visa’s $11 trillion figure. Finally, the report claimed that strong stablecoin payment traction could surpass legacy transfers in less than a decade due to cost and speed benefits.

Tether’s USDT leads supply growth

Meanwhile, the stablecoin supply has increased by over $100 billion over the past year, with the market size rising from $204 billion to $307 billion.

Nearly half of the new growth was driven by Tether’s USDT, which increased by $48 billion to $186 billion.

Circle’s USDC increased by $26 billion too, bringing its market supply to $76 billion. Sky Protocol’s (formerly Maker) USDS, PayPal’s PYUSD and World Liberty Financial’s USD1 made it to the top five outliers.

In particular, USDS and PYUSD offer yield and may be the growth catalyst behind their 2025 expansion. Overall, 99% of the stablecoins remain denominated in U.S dollars, reinforcing their dominance against other global currencies.


Final Thoughts

  • Real stablecoin payments hit $390 billion in 2025, representing less than 1% of global volumes of $2 quadrillion.
  • B2B and card-related stablecoin payments saw explosive triple-digit growth of 733% and 673%, respectively.

Related Questions

QWhat is the total global annual payment volume in 2025, and what percentage of this do real-world stablecoin payments represent?

AThe total global annual payment volume in 2025 was $2 quadrillion. Real-world stablecoin payments, at $390 billion, represent less than 1% of this total.

QWhich two sectors saw the most explosive growth in stablecoin payments in 2025, and what were their growth rates?

ABusiness-to-business (B2B) and card-related stablecoin payments saw the most explosive growth. B2B grew by 733% and card-related spending grew by 673%.

QWhat was the primary driver for the $100 billion increase in the stablecoin supply over the past year, and what is its current market size?

ATether's USDT was the primary driver, increasing by $48 billion. The total stablecoin market size grew from $204 billion to $307 billion.

QAccording to the report, what is the main use case for the vast majority (99%) of stablecoin volume, as opposed to real-world transactions?

AThe remaining 99% of stablecoin volume was linked to crypto trading, speculation, internal transfers, and other activities rather than real-world transactions.

QWhat potential does the report claim for stablecoin payments in comparison to legacy transfer systems, and why?

AThe report claims that strong stablecoin payment traction could surpass legacy transfers in less than a decade due to their cost and speed benefits.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit18m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit18m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit34m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片