SPACE Token Debuts With Airdrop Plans and Exchange Listings, Sees Volatile Trading

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-24Last updated on 2026-01-24

Abstract

SPACE Token launched on January 23 across multiple blockchains including Ethereum, BSC, and Base. It was listed on major exchanges like Binance, Kraken, and decentralized platforms such as PancakeSwap. The project introduced a phased airdrop program: Season 1 distributes tokens to early adopters with monthly unlocks over three months, while Season 2 follows a similar structure starting one month later. A staking program offers up to 10% APR. On its debut, the token experienced high volatility, initially surging to around $0.027 before dropping about 21.81% to approximately $0.0176. Trading volume surged over 718% to $236 million, indicating significant market activity despite the price decline.

Spacecoin, which provides satellite-based internet infrastructure, launched its own token, SPACE, on January 23, and it is available on Creditcoin, Ethereum, BSC, and Base blockchain networks. As it also plans a seasonal airdrop, staking program, and to list it on the exchanges, which has been confirmed through Spacecoin’s official X handle.

As per the post, on the first day, the token gets listed on centralized exchanges such as Binance, Kraken, OKX, Bitget, Coinone, KuCoin, MEXC, Bybit, and Blockchain.com. The SPACE token is also available on decentralized exchanges such as Aster DEX and PancakeSwap.

SPACE Airdrop and Staking Program

The official Spacecoin X post explains the SPACE token airdrop details, where 25% of tokens are unlocked at launch, and the remaining 1.05 billion SPACE tokens are released each month over the course of three months. With that, Season 1 is aimed at early adopters like Spacecoin Cadets and Creditcoin holders.

Then, Season 2, which allocates 1.26 billion tokens with 33.3% unlocked each month for three months, which would begin one month after the Token Generation Event. So, this type of phased distribution is mainly to increase airdrop participation while reducing selling pressure.

Also, Spacecoin has launched a time-limited staking mechanism that enables users to support the stability of the network while earning passive income, and an annual percentage rate (APR) of up to 10% is available to participants who invest their tokens, noted in the post.

SPACE Token Sees High Volatility

During the token launch yesterday, 21 million tokens entered as circulating supply, which is equal to 10.25% of the fixed 21 billion token supply.
The SPACE token surged and reached nearly $0.02701 immediately after the token launch, it is currently trading near $0.01759, which is down about 21.81%, but the trading volume alone surged around 718.68% and reached $236 million, with the market cap around $37 million, as per the CMC data. With that, the sharp rise in trading volume despite the price pullback suggests high volatility following the SPACE token’s launch.

Highlighted Crypto News:

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) on the Rise: Is This a Bullish Play or a Short-Term Bounce?

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit7m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit7m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News11m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News11m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit19m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit19m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit27m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit27m ago

In Order to Buy Investigational Weight-Loss Drugs, a Group of Americans Learn to Use Bitcoin Payments

To purchase the experimental weight-loss drug retatrutide, Americans like Zach are turning to Bitcoin despite initial skepticism. Retatrutide, an unapproved triple-agonist from Eli Lilly, offers significant weight loss but is inaccessible through U.S. channels. Buying from domestic resellers costs around $3,600 annually, whereas Zach found a Chinese seller offering a year’s supply for $240—with Bitcoin as the only payment option. This price disparity led him to learn cryptocurrency for the transaction. Online sellers of such “research chemicals” or peptides often use Bitcoin because traditional payment systems avoid the regulatory and legal risks. Chainalysis data shows crypto payments to grey-market peptide sellers reached $32 million in Q1 2026, suggesting an annualized volume exceeding $100 million, though this remains a fraction of the estimated $1-3 billion black market. The trend intersects with communities like DeSciNYC, where events on peptides draw crowds interested in biohacking and longevity, indicating shared interests between crypto and wellness circles. However, potential FDA moves to legalize certain peptides could shift demand away from the black market and reduce the need for crypto payments.

marsbit29m ago

In Order to Buy Investigational Weight-Loss Drugs, a Group of Americans Learn to Use Bitcoin Payments