Solana: Why SOL risks a 30% drop after losing KEY support

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-30Last updated on 2026-01-30

Abstract

The crypto market faced a slump, intensifying selling pressure on Solana (SOL) as sentiment turned bearish. SOL lost a key support level at $118, which it had held since March 2024. A whale deposited 2M USDC on Hyperliquid DEX and opened a $6.15M SOL short position. U.S. Solana spot ETFs also saw outflows of $2.22M. SOL dropped 6.65% to $115, with trading volume surging 105%. Technical analysis suggests a potential 30% decline to $78 if SOL remains below $118. The 50-day EMA and ADX support the bearish outlook. Derivatives data shows significant leveraged short positions, reflecting trader expectations of further downside.

The crypto market faced a slump, intensifying selling pressure on Solana [SOL] as trader and investor sentiment turned increasingly bearish.

Within this broader sell‐off, SOL was hit the hardest. It lost a key support level at $118, which it had successfully defended since March 2024.

Adding to the bearish outlook, a newly created wallet deposited 2 million USDC on the Hyperliquid DEX and opened multiple short positions. This reflects the current market outlook, according to the crypto tracker Onchain Lens.

Further analysis of the whale’s activity shows that it has opened a massive SOL short position worth $6.15 million at the $122.91 level.

This sell-off is not limited to the crypto market alone; it has also been observed on Wall Street.

According to on-chain analytics platform SoSoValue, U.S.–based Solana spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded a significant outflow of $2.22 million. This suggests that investors and institutions are withdrawing capital from the underlying asset.

Both developments highlight market sentiment toward Solana, and their impact is reflected in the asset’s price.

Solana price action and key levels

At press time, SOL plunged 6.65% over the past 24 hours and was trading near $115.

Despite the price decline, market participation surged significantly, with SOL’s trading volume jumping 105% to $7.60 billion during the same period. This indicates strong interest from traders and investors, leading to heavy market participation.

Looking at the price charts, it appears that SOL has lost one of its strongest key support levels at $118, which it had been holding since March 2024.

On the weekly chart, the asset had previously rebounded from this support more than ten times, but SOL has now failed to hold it.

On the daily chart, price action suggests that SOL could see a strong downside move, potentially declining by 30% and reaching the $78 level in the coming days.

However, this outlook would only be validated if the asset remains below or closes a daily candle under the $118 level.

Technical indicators, including the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) and the Average Directional Index (ADX), support SOL’s bearish outlook.

Notably, SOL was trading below the 50 EMA, indicating that the asset is bearish in the short term.

Meanwhile, the ADX, which measures the strength of the current trend, had risen to 33, above the key threshold of 25, suggesting that SOL is experiencing a strong directional trend.

Traders eye short-leveraged positions

From a derivatives perspective, traders appear to be strongly positioned on the bearish side.

According to CoinGlass data, intraday traders are closely monitoring two critical price levels. On the downside, the focus is on $112.8, while on the upside, attention centers around $120.2.

At these levels, traders have established significant leveraged positions. Short‐leveraged positions total $55.15 million, while long‐leveraged positions are far larger, amounting to $241 million.

This positioning highlights the market’s current tension, with traders preparing for sharp moves in either direction.

This positioning clearly reflects how intraday traders are viewing SOL at the moment.


Final Thoughts

  • Bearish activity from market participants has strengthened Solana’s negative outlook.
  • Price action suggests that another 30% drop in SOL could be on the cards if the asset remains below the $118 level.

Related Questions

QWhat key support level did Solana (SOL) lose, and why is it significant?

ASolana lost the key support level at $118, which it had successfully defended since March 2024. This level is significant because the price had rebounded from it more than ten times on the weekly chart, making it a historically strong support. Losing it suggests a potential shift in market structure and opens the door for further downside.

QWhat on-chain and institutional activities are contributing to SOL's bearish pressure?

AA newly created wallet deposited 2 million USDC on Hyperliquid DEX and opened a massive $6.15 million SOL short position. Additionally, U.S.-based Solana spot ETFs recorded a significant outflow of $2.22 million, indicating that both large traders and institutional investors are withdrawing capital or betting against the asset.

QAccording to the price chart analysis, what is the potential downside target for SOL?

AThe price action on the daily chart suggests that SOL could see a strong downside move, potentially declining by 30% from its current level to reach the $78 level in the coming days, provided it remains below the $118 support.

QWhat do the technical indicators (50-day EMA and ADX) reveal about SOL's current trend?

ASOL was trading below the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), indicating a bearish short-term trend. The Average Directional Index (ADX) had risen to 33, which is above the key threshold of 25, suggesting that the current downtrend is strong and has significant momentum.

QHow are derivatives traders positioned regarding SOL, and what does it indicate?

ADerivatives data shows that intraday traders are focused on the $112.8 (downside) and $120.2 (upside) price levels. There are $55.15 million in short-leveraged positions and a much larger $241 million in long-leveraged positions. This creates significant market tension and indicates that traders are preparing for a sharp price move in either direction, with a large number of long positions at risk if the price falls further.

Related Reads

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit12m ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit12m ago

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片