Solana ETFs Just Crossed A New Record Level, But Can Price Reclaim $100?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

Solana ETFs have reached a record $1.5 billion in net inflows since their July 2025 launch, a period during which SOL's price declined by 57%. This significant institutional demand, with half the assets coming from large firms filing 13F disclosures, presents a stark contrast to the bearish market sentiment and SOL's drop below $100 to a low of $85. Analysts suggest this sustained ETF momentum could create buying pressure that catalyzes a price recovery. One analyst projects that reclaiming the $100 level could trigger a breakout from a long-term descending channel, potentially driving SOL's price toward $250.

Solana ETFs are breaking records even as SOL prices are in a downtrend. While bearish sentiment dominates the crypto market, billions of dollars continue to flow in, painting a contrasting picture between price action and institutional demand. As the cryptocurrency attempts a recovery, analysts are once again eyeing a return to the $100 level. However, the question remains whether the current ETF momentum could be the catalyst that drives a price recovery.

Solana ETFs Hit Record Levels Amidst Price Decline

Solana has been experiencing a rough stretch in the markets lately, with its price falling well below $100 and hitting a low of $85. The drop marks a prolonged bearish trend that has tested the patience of many investors who entered the market at higher levels.

Despite weak price action, Solana Spot ETFs are attracting capital at an unprecedented rate, surprising even seasoned market watchers. This suggests that long-term conviction in the cryptocurrency remains strong even as short-term selling persists.

Notably, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas brought Solana’s ETF numbers into focus in a recent post on X, highlighting that the investment fund has accumulated an impressive $1.5 billion in net inflows since its launch in July 2025. He noted that this remarkable growth occurred despite SOL’s 57% price crash from its ETF launch date, which was one of the toughest debut periods for any ETF product.

Source: Bloomberg

Balchunas pointed out that when Solana’s market cap is compared to Bitcoin’s, the numbers look even more impressive. On that basis, the inflows into Solana are roughly $54 billion for Spot Bitcoin ETFs, approximately double what BTC itself attracted at the same point in its ETF journey. He noted that the key difference here is that Bitcoin was surging at the time, whereas Solana reached equivalent inflows while in decline.

The Bloomberg analyst also highlighted Solana’s ETF composition, noting that approximately 50% of the fund’s assets came from institutional investors that filed 13F disclosures. He described this as a “serious” investor base, suggesting that large-scale firms are backing Solana and may be positioning for the long term.

SOL Price Roadmap To A $100 Recovery

If Solana’s ETF momentum and institutional demand continue to rise, it would not be surprising if the cryptocurrency attempts another price recovery back toward the $100 region. Usually, demand from ETFs helps create consistent buying pressure, as fund inflows translate into actual purchases of the underlying asset, supporting its price over time. However, whether Solana can turn its current ETF demand into sustained price recovery remains to be seen.

Source: X

On the more technical side, crypto analyst Satoshi Flipper has issued a forecast suggesting that Solana may be preparing to reclaim the $100 level. He projects that once this happens, the cryptocurrency will automatically break out of a descending channel that has been in place for the past seven months. If the breakout plays out as expected, the analyst projects that the move could carry the SOL price well beyond $100, potentially driving it toward $250.

SOL recovers again | Source: SOLUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trend of Solana ETFs despite the price decline of SOL?

ASolana Spot ETFs are breaking records and attracting capital at an unprecedented rate, with $1.5 billion in net inflows since their launch in July 2025, even as the SOL price has declined significantly.

QAccording to Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas, how do Solana ETF inflows compare to Bitcoin ETF inflows on a market cap basis?

AOn a market cap basis, the inflows into Solana ETFs are roughly equivalent to $54 billion for Spot Bitcoin ETFs, which is approximately double what Bitcoin attracted at the same point in its ETF journey.

QWhat percentage of the Solana ETF assets came from institutional investors filing 13F disclosures?

AApproximately 50% of the Solana ETF's assets came from institutional investors that filed 13F disclosures.

QWhat key price level are analysts watching for a potential Solana recovery?

AAnalysts are eyeing a return to the $100 level as a key milestone for Solana's potential price recovery.

QWhat is crypto analyst Satoshi Flipper's price projection for SOL if it breaks out of its descending channel?

ASatoshi Flipper projects that if Solana breaks out of its descending channel, the price could carry well beyond $100, potentially driving it toward $250.

Related Reads

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3h ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3h ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片