Solana absorbs 98K SOL sell-off – Why price refuses to break

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-23Last updated on 2026-01-23

Abstract

A long-term Solana staker has begun a gradual exit, unstaking over 98,000 SOL after nearly two years, resulting in a realized loss exceeding $6.6 million. Despite this distribution, the market has absorbed the selling pressure without a sharp price decline. Solana's price remains range-bound between $120 and $150, with buyers consistently defending the $120–$125 support zone. The daily RSI has softened to around 43.8, indicating weakening momentum but no oversold conditions. Spot Taker CVD shows buyer dominance, absorbing sell pressure without triggering a breakout. Binance top traders maintain a strong long bias, with a Long/Short Ratio of 4.22. Overall, the market reflects a balance between persistent selling and solid demand, lacking decisive directional movement.

A long-term Solana staker has begun a gradual exit after unstaking more than 98,000 SOL following nearly two years of holding.

The wallet originally withdrew the tokens from Binance near cycle highs before committing them to staking.

However, the current exit unfolds at significantly lower prices, locking in a realized loss exceeding $6.6 million. The holder uses a DCA approach rather than a single sell-off, which spreads supply across time.

As a result, the market avoids abrupt liquidation-driven reactions. Still, this steady distribution introduces persistent overhead pressure.

Meanwhile, buyers continue stepping in near support, setting up a clear test between long-term supply and short-term demand.

Solana price compresses inside a familiar range

Solana [SOL] price continued to trade inside a clearly defined range at press time, with buyers repeatedly defending the $120–$125 demand zone. Each dip into this area triggered quick reactions, preventing downside continuation.

However, upside attempts consistently failed near $146–$150, which aligned with the upper boundary of the consolidation box.

Every rally toward that level loses momentum, forcing price back toward the range midpoint. The $135 area acted as a short-term pivot, flipping between support and resistance during recent sessions.

As a result, volatility remained suppressed. Therefore, Solana stayed trapped between $120 and $150, reflecting balance rather than directional control.

Momentum continued to soften as the daily RSI rolled over from recent highs near 70 and drifted lower toward the low-40s.

At the press time, RSI sat around 43.8, confirming weakening upside pressure without signaling oversold conditions. This positioning matters because RSI remains well above the 30 threshold, showing sellers lack dominance.

However, RSI also struggled to reclaim the 50 midline, which caps bullish momentum during consolidation phases. As RSI flattens, it mirrors price compression rather than trend acceleration.

Therefore, momentum points to exhaustion, not breakdown, while buyers continue stepping in before momentum deteriorates further.

Taker demand absorbs sell pressure

Spot Taker CVD over the 90-day window remained buyer-dominant despite visible sell-side distribution from large holders.

Aggressive market buyers continue lifting offers even as long-term exits unfold.

However, price does not expand higher, which signals absorption rather than chase behavior. This dynamic shows buyers meeting supply without forcing breakouts.

Meanwhile, sustained buyer dominance reduces the likelihood of sharp downside continuation. Still, absorption alone does not guarantee upside expansion.

Instead, it stabilizes price while excess supply clears. Therefore, order-flow conditions support range stability rather than immediate directional resolution.

Solana top traders stay aggressively long

Binance top trader positioning remains heavily skewed toward longs despite Solana’s failure to trend.

As of press time, 80.86% of top trader accounts held long positions, while 19.14% remain short.

This imbalance placed the Long/Short Ratio at 4.22, confirming that long exposure outweighs shorts by more than four times. However, the price continues consolidating rather than breaking higher.

The ratio has eased slightly from recent peaks above 4.4, suggesting mild moderation rather than aggressive de-risking. Therefore, trader conviction remains strong, but price structure has yet to confirm it.

To sum up, Solana currently reflects a market absorbing long-term distribution without losing structural support.

Buyers defend key levels, RSI avoids breakdown, taker demand stays active, and top traders remain heavily long. However, the price still lacks expansion.

Until Solana breaks decisively beyond the consolidation range, the market remains balanced between conviction and confirmation.


Final Thoughts

  • Long-term selling pressure persists; however, market structure remains intact as buyers continue absorbing supply.
  • Trader confidence stays elevated, however price still needs expansion to validate bullish expectations.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the significance of the 98,000 SOL unstaking event and how did the holder manage the sell-off?

AA long-term Solana staker began a gradual exit by unstaking over 98,000 SOL after nearly two years of holding. Instead of a single sell-off, the holder used a Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) approach to spread the supply across time, which avoided abrupt liquidation-driven reactions but introduced persistent overhead pressure.

QWhat is Solana's current price range and key levels as described in the article?

ASolana's price was trading inside a clearly defined range between $120–$125 (demand zone) and $146–$150 (upper boundary). The $135 area acted as a short-term pivot, flipping between support and resistance, reflecting market balance rather than directional control.

QWhat does the RSI level of 43.8 indicate about Solana's momentum?

AThe daily RSI sitting at 43.8 confirms weakening upside pressure without signaling oversold conditions. It remains well above the 30 threshold, showing sellers lack dominance, but struggles to reclaim the 50 midline, indicating exhaustion and price compression rather than trend acceleration.

QHow did spot Taker CVD and market buyers respond to the sell pressure?

ASpot Taker CVD over the 90-day window remained buyer-dominant, with aggressive market buyers lifting offers and absorbing the sell-side distribution from large holders. This absorption dynamic stabilized price without forcing breakouts, supporting range stability rather than immediate directional movement.

QWhat is the positioning of Binance top traders regarding Solana, and what does the Long/Short Ratio indicate?

ABinance top trader positioning remains heavily skewed toward longs, with 80.86% of accounts holding long positions and a Long/Short Ratio of 4.22, meaning long exposure outweighs shorts by more than four times. This shows strong trader conviction, although the price has yet to break out and confirm this bullish sentiment.

Related Reads

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit29m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit29m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit1h ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片