SlowMist Flags Snap Store Attack Targeting Crypto Seed Phrases

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-21Last updated on 2026-01-21

Abstract

Blockchain security firm SlowMist has identified a new Linux-based threat targeting cryptocurrency users through the Snap Store. Attackers hijack trusted publisher accounts by exploiting expired domains, then push malicious updates to popular wallet apps like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet. These fake apps prompt users to enter their recovery phrases, which are then stolen, enabling attackers to drain funds. This supply-chain attack exploits user trust in official update channels, making it highly effective. SlowMist warns users to verify publishers and avoid entering seed phrases on unfamiliar platforms, highlighting a growing trend of infrastructure-focused attacks in crypto security.

Blockchain security firm SlowMist has flagged a new Linux-based threat that targets crypto recovery phrases by exploiting trusted apps distributed through the Snap Store. The company warned that attackers are hijacking long-standing Snap Store publisher accounts and pushing malicious wallet updates through official distribution channels, putting long-time Linux users at risk.

In a post on X, SlowMist chief information security officer 23pds said attackers are abusing expired domains linked to legitimate Snap Store publishers. After regaining control of those domains, the attackers reset account credentials, take over trusted developer accounts, and publish malware disguised as wallet software updates. This tactic gives the attack a dangerous advantage: users often trust updates from established publishers and install them without suspicion.

Once the malicious apps land on a victim’s system, they prompt users to enter crypto wallet recovery phrases. The malware then exfiltrates those phrases, allowing attackers to drain wallets quickly, often before the victim realizes anything went wrong.

Attackers hijack Snap Store publishers using expired domains

The Snap Store is the official app store for Linux, used for the distribution of software that is packaged as “snaps.” It is considered a trusted source by many users, just like the App Store or Microsoft Store, as it provides verified publishers, easy updates, and a centralized distribution.

SlowMist said attackers are targeting publisher accounts tied to domains that have expired. Once a domain expires, criminals can re-register it and gain access to domain-linked email addresses. From there, they can initiate password resets and seize control of Snap Store developer accounts.

This method enables attackers to compromise publishers with active users and existing download histories. Rather than depending on victims to download the malicious new apps, they inject the malware into the regular updates. This supply chain tactic increases the success rate because users are more likely to accept updates and not check all the changes.

SlowMist has identified at least two domains associated with the compromised publisher accounts: “storewise[.]tech” and “vagueentertainment[.]com.” Once the attackers hijacked the accounts, they allegedly used the apps to impersonate popular crypto wallet brands.

Fake wallet apps mimic trusted brands

According to SlowMist, the affected Snap Store apps are clones of popular wallet applications like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet. Attackers use user interfaces that closely resemble legitimate applications, which increases credibility and reduces suspicion.

These apps, after being installed or updated, will ask the user to input their wallet recovery phrase with the intention of wallet setup, sync, or account verification. After the user has provided the wallet recovery phrase, the attacker can use this phrase to restore the wallet and drain its funds without needing any further access to the victim’s device.

This approach remains very effective because seed phrases provide full control of the assets. Even the strongest passwords and device security cannot protect funds once hackers possess the recovery phrase.

Supply-chain hacks grow more damaging

The incident at the Snap Store is part of a larger trend in crypto security, where attackers are moving from exploiting protocols to compromising infrastructure. Instead of attacking smart contracts directly, criminals increasingly target trusted software distribution systems, update channels, and third-party service providers.

CertiK data shared with the media house in December showed crypto hack losses reached $3.3 billion in 2025, even though the number of incidents declined. According to CertiK, the losses were more concentrated in fewer but more serious supply chain events, with $1.45 billion in losses being attributed to only two major incidents.

This trend indicates that attackers are optimizing for scale and impact. With the improvement of DeFi security at the smart contract level, attackers target the weakest links, apps, publishers, and update infrastructure, where trust is the biggest vulnerability.

What users should watch next?

For Linux users who keep crypto, the wallet software download and update processes must be done with extra care. Users need to verify the identity of the publishers, check the official download sources, and avoid entering recovery phrases on unfamiliar platforms. Security teams may also need to monitor Snap Store listings more closely, especially when there are sudden changes in the ownership of publishers.

The takeaway from the SlowMist alert is clear: the greatest danger now often comes from trusted sources, not the obvious phishing scams.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Tom Lee Warns Crypto Markets Could Face Painful Correction in 2026

TagsBlockchaincrypto securitylinuxSmart ContractSupply chain

Related Questions

QWhat is the new threat flagged by SlowMist that targets crypto recovery phrases?

ASlowMist has flagged a new Linux-based threat that targets crypto recovery phrases by exploiting trusted apps distributed through the Snap Store. Attackers hijack long-standing publisher accounts and push malicious wallet updates.

QHow do attackers gain control of trusted Snap Store publisher accounts?

AAttackers abuse expired domains linked to legitimate publishers. They re-register the expired domains, gain access to domain-linked email addresses, reset account credentials, and take over the trusted developer accounts.

QWhich popular crypto wallet brands are being impersonated by the malicious apps in this attack?

AThe malicious apps are clones that impersonate popular crypto wallet brands like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet.

QWhy are supply-chain attacks like the one on the Snap Store becoming more damaging according to the article?

ASupply-chain attacks are becoming more damaging because attackers are targeting trusted software distribution systems and update channels, leading to fewer but more serious incidents with concentrated losses, as seen in the $1.45 billion attributed to just two major events in 2025.

QWhat precautions should Linux users take to protect themselves from such threats?

ALinux users should verify the identity of publishers, check official download sources, avoid entering recovery phrases on unfamiliar platforms, and monitor Snap Store listings for sudden changes in publisher ownership.

Related Reads

UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

UBS: A-share tech stocks still far from peak crowding levels A-shares' technology sector has seen a strong rebound, with trading activity hitting record highs, raising concerns about market crowding. However, UBS Securities argues that a key indicator of institutional positioning suggests the current crowding level remains well below historical peaks. While the large-cap tech sector's share of total A-share trading volume and market capitalization have reached historical highs, the overweight ratio of domestic mutual funds in this sector stood at 9.9% in Q1 2026. This is down from 11.6% in Q3 2025 and significantly lower than the historical peak of 14.1% in Q4 2015. It also pales in comparison to the historical peak overweight of 18.7% for the consumer sector. UBS notes that typical cycles from a low to a peak in fund overweighting last about three years, and the current outperformance of the tech/growth style has lasted less than two years since the policy pivot in September 2024. UBS expects A-share earnings recovery to accelerate, providing fundamental support. It forecasts 2026 A-share profit growth to rise to 11% from 3.9% in 2025. Non-financial A-share profits grew 11.8% YoY in Q1 2026, with gross and net profit margins at their highest since 2023. Persistent fund inflows, the expansion of thematic ETFs, and a recovery in private fund issuance are supporting market liquidity. In tactical allocation, UBS favors growth and cyclical styles under its "slow bull" base case, with overweight ratings on six sectors: Electronics (benefiting from semiconductor inventory recovery and AI innovation), Communications (driven by AI computing demand), Machinery (aided by domestic capex recovery), Non-ferrous Metals (due to rising copper/aluminum prices), Chemicals (supported by anti-involution policies), and Electrical Equipment (driven by policy support and AI data center power demand).

marsbit13m ago

UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

marsbit13m ago

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbit1h ago

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbit1h ago

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbit1h ago

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片