"Sell America" Trade Resurfaces: Global Funds Reprice Washington Policy Risks, Dollar and Treasuries Bear the Brunt

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-06Last updated on 2026-08-06

Abstract

"Sale of America" Trade Resurges as Global Funds Reprice Washington Policy Risks, Hitting Dollar and Treasuries First Recent policy signals from Washington are prompting global bond and foreign exchange investors to reignite the "Sale of America" debate. Uncertainty stems from Fed Chair Wash's shift towards less policy communication, Treasury Secretary Bessant's approval of joint intervention with Japan to support the Yen (the first such coordinated move in nearly 30 years), expanding fiscal deficits, and trade war fears. These factors are undermining confidence in U.S. assets. The 30-year Treasury yield recently broke above 5%, hitting a high not seen since 2007, while the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index has fallen about 2% from its June peak. This dollar weakness is unusual given still-high U.S. interest rates. Investors cite policy uncertainty as a key driver, with one manager calling the Fed Chair and Treasury Secretary a "double whammy" creating a "Trump administration premium." While the S&P 500 continues hitting record highs and foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries remain high, parts of the bond and FX markets are adjusting. A core concern is whether the Fed under Wash can effectively anchor inflation expectations; analysts warn that if the Fed lags the hiking cycle, long-end yields could face further upward pressure. The 30-year term premium has risen sharply. The U.S.-backed Yen intervention has also sparked debate on the dollar's structural outlook. While framed by B...

Original Author: Xu Chao

Original Source: Wall Street News

Policy signals emanating consecutively from Washington are reigniting discussions of "Sell America" among global bond and foreign exchange investors. The shift in communication style from the Federal Reserve Chair, the Treasury's intervention in the forex market, coupled with expanding fiscal deficits and the specter of trade wars, are causing a new wave of wavering confidence in U.S. assets.

Latest developments show that Fed Chair Warsh favors reducing policy communication, raising market doubts about the Fed's anti-inflation commitment. Meanwhile, according to The Wall Street Journal, Trump has spoken with Warsh multiple times since his appointment, breaking recent precedent—though there is no evidence that rates were discussed. Treasury Secretary Bessant signed off on U.S. assistance in Japan's intervention in the currency market to support the yen, the first such coordinated action in nearly thirty years, further weighing on the dollar.

This double shock is already reflected in market prices. The 30-year Treasury yield broke above 5%, hitting its highest level since 2007, though it has since pulled back; the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index has fallen about 2% from its June high, with the dollar weakening against almost all G10 currencies—a move that appears anomalous against the backdrop of still-high U.S. interest rates.

Rajeev De Mello, Global Macro Portfolio Manager at Gama Asset Management, stated that due to policy uncertainty, he is selling Treasuries and dollars, "Bessant and Warsh are a double whammy for global markets. Investors have to price their policy risks into the dollar and the Treasury curve—that's the Trump administration premium."

"Sell America" Reemerges, but Differs from Last Year

The "Sell America" trade first gained attention in April last year when Trump announced tariff measures, triggering synchronized selling of the dollar, U.S. stocks, and Treasuries. Although that episode subsided quickly, it shook a long-held market assumption—that the U.S. could rely on the dollar's reserve currency status and deep capital markets to finance its ever-expanding fiscal deficit indefinitely.

This time, the situation is more complex. In U.S. equities, the strength in tech stocks has driven the S&P 500 to new record highs, with no broad-based market crash. Foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries reached $9.4 trillion as of May, up 4% from a year ago, indicating overall confidence remains.

However, some global investors in the bond and foreign exchange markets are adjusting their positions.

Carol Lye, Portfolio Manager at Brandywine Global Investment Management in Singapore, said her firm holds a medium-term bearish dollar position. "Now Bessant has also stepped out to say the yen should be stronger, which will support our weak dollar view." She also pointed out that the "confusing signals" from Washington are not conducive to capital flowing into the U.S.

Fed Credibility in Question, Pressure Mounts on Long-End Treasuries

A core market concern is whether the Fed, under Warsh, can effectively anchor inflation expectations. Analysts believe that if the Fed lags behind the tightening cycle, long-end yields will face further upward pressure.

Bloomberg Economics data shows the term premium on 30-year Treasuries—the extra return investors demand for holding longer-term bonds—rose to 1.56% this week, the highest level since 2013. Allianz Global Investors (€598 billion AUM) currently favors steepener trades, focusing on positioning five- to seven-year against 30-year bonds.

The firm's Senior Portfolio Manager Ranjiv Mann said, "The risk is that the Fed may be behind the curve on the tightening cycle, and the long end could become even more unanchored, while the fiscal challenge the U.S. faces is already severe." Meanwhile, the Treasury raised its current-quarter borrowing estimate to $739 billion this week, with markets widely expecting the government to continue its strategy of relying mainly on short-term T-bills, leading to ongoing supply pressure.

Yen Intervention Sparks Debate on Dollar Outlook

The U.S. move to assist in forex market intervention has prompted a re-evaluation of the dollar's structural trajectory among investors.

Bessant defended the move in a CNBC interview, saying continued yen weakness could trigger broader depreciation of Asian currencies, and Washington would do "whatever it takes" to support Japan in a manner beneficial to the U.S. economy and stabilizing global markets.

This intervention was carried out by buying euros and selling dollars to purchase yen, aiming to avoid direct shocks to the Treasury market. Bessant described this as a "rebalancing of reserves." However, market participants warn that if Japan—the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries, with holdings exceeding $1 trillion—is forced to sell some Treasuries to fund intervention, ripple effects could still reach the Treasury market.

Steve Brice, Global Chief Investment Officer at Standard Chartered's wealth management division, expects the dollar to fall about 3% to 4% over the next 12 months, stating, "Government actions and other factors are gradually eroding the structural advantages of the U.S. market."

"American Exceptionalism" Not Over, but Risks Cannot Be Ignored

Several strategists stress that no one is currently predicting the end of the dollar's global reserve currency status, or that Treasuries will lose their status as the world's benchmark risk-free asset.

Lotfi Karoui, Multi-Asset Credit Strategist at PIMCO, pointed out in a research report that U.S. assets remain attractive overall to foreign buyers, and the lack of large-scale coordinated selling is proof. So far this year, synchronized declines in 10-year Treasuries, U.S. investment-grade corporate bond spreads, and the dollar have occurred on only about 2% of trading days. "If there was a real loss of confidence in American exceptionalism, this kind of coordinated selling should happen more frequently."

But Ronald Temple, Chief Market Strategist at Lazard, notes that the core risk lies in the fact that the pace of foreign capital buying Treasuries is not keeping up with the pace of U.S. debt expansion. He stated in a Bloomberg TV interview, "The backdrop of confidence around the status of U.S. safe assets is changing. There are many questions. Over the next few years, a dollar depreciation trend will reemerge."

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what are the main Washington policy signals that are driving the 'Sell America' trade discussion to re-emerge among global investors?

AThe main policy signals include: 1) A perceived shift in communication style by Fed Chair Warsh, raising doubts about the Fed's inflation commitment; 2) Treasury Secretary Besant's approval of US coordination to support the yen through FX intervention, a move that puts downward pressure on the USD; 3) Expanding fiscal deficits; and 4) The threat of trade wars.

QWhat does the term 'Trump administration premium' refer to in the context of the financial markets, as cited in the article?

AThe term 'Trump administration premium' refers to the additional policy risk premium that investors are now factoring into the pricing of US assets, specifically the US dollar and US Treasury bonds, due to the perceived policy uncertainty and unconventional actions from key figures like Treasury Secretary Besant and Fed Chair Warsh.

QWhat key difference does the article highlight between the current 'Sell America' dynamic and the one that occurred last April?

AThe key difference is that, unlike last April's brief episode which saw synchronized selling of the USD, US stocks, and US Treasuries, the current situation is more complex. While bond and FX markets are adjusting, US stocks (led by tech) are hitting record highs, and foreign holdings of US Treasuries have continued to grow, indicating that overall confidence has not completely collapsed.

QWhy are some asset managers, according to the article, concerned about the Federal Reserve under Chair Warsh potentially 'falling behind the curve'?

AThe concern is that if the Federal Reserve is perceived to be too slow or behind schedule in raising interest rates to combat inflation, it could lose credibility in anchoring long-term inflation expectations. This failure could lead to 'dis-anchored' long-end Treasury yields facing further upward pressure, exacerbating the challenges posed by the US's already significant fiscal deficit.

QWhat is a significant structural concern mentioned by strategists regarding the future demand for US Treasuries, despite the lack of a mass exodus currently?

AA significant structural concern is that the pace of foreign capital inflows to buy US Treasury debt is not keeping up with the speed at which the US government is expanding its borrowing to finance its deficits. This imbalance suggests a potential future supply-demand problem that could undermine confidence in US safe assets and contribute to a weaker US dollar.

Related Reads

Just 3.5 Months After Its Founding, It Started Making External Investments: The Embodied AI Sector Is Collectively 'Investing While Fundraising'

A counterintuitive trend is emerging in China's embodied AI sector: numerous startups that are still actively raising capital themselves are now making strategic investments in other companies. An analysis of 29 such enterprises reveals a pattern of "fundraising while investing," where companies, often still in early funding rounds, rapidly deploy capital into the ecosystem. These 29 investment entities, primarily based in the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta regions, have executed over 125 investment deals. Notably, 17 of them (59%) are humanoid robot manufacturers, making them the most active investors. The trend shows that newer companies are investing faster; firms founded after 2023 made their first external investment in an average of just 22.8 months, with one company, Poke Robotics, doing so within 3.8 months of its founding. Zhiyuan Robot (智元机器人) stands out as the most active corporate venture capital (CVC) player, completing 37 investments in 23 months. A more complex, networked investment structure is also forming, where companies like Lingchu Intelligent (灵初智能) and Lingxin Qiaoshou (灵心巧手), which received investments from larger players, have themselves become active investors, extending the strategic reach of capital down the supply chain. This collective shift from a few large players to widespread participation signals a strategic move to use capital as a lever to accelerate industry consolidation. Companies are seeking to quickly integrate critical supply chain elements—such as dexterous hands, joint motors, and AI data platforms—into their ecosystems to gain a competitive edge in a rapidly evolving, highly contested market window. The strategy aims to compress the decade-long process of traditional supply chain integration into just a few years, though it carries risks related to technology bets and ongoing capital burn. As the sector's IPO pipeline grows, this "fundraise and invest" model may soon become a standard industry practice.

marsbit3m ago

Just 3.5 Months After Its Founding, It Started Making External Investments: The Embodied AI Sector Is Collectively 'Investing While Fundraising'

marsbit3m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片