Ripple President Says Stablecoins Will Power Global Settlement

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-21Last updated on 2026-01-21

Abstract

Ripple President Monica Long asserts that stablecoins are set to become the foundation of global settlement systems, rather than an alternative payment rail. She emphasizes that fiat-pegged tokens will serve as the core infrastructure for cross-border transactions, with major institutions like Visa and Stripe integrating them into payment flows. Long predicts that within five years, stablecoins will be fully integrated into global payment systems as the default settlement layer. She also highlights the crypto industry's shift from a speculative phase to a "production era," marked by increased institutional adoption and practical utility. By 2026, she expects significant crypto integration among Fortune 500 companies, including tokenized assets, on-chain treasury bills, and programmable financial instruments directly embedded into corporate workflows. This transition positions crypto as the operating layer of modern finance.

The President of Ripple, Monica Long, has mentioned in a new thread on X that stablecoins will be the base of global settlement, not an alternative rail, mounting fiat-pegged tokens as the pillar of cross-border money movement instead of just a side experiment.

She highlighted Visa, Stripe and other prominent institutions so far, hardwiring them into payment flows and recognising business-to-business transactions as the growth engine, having corporates leverage digital dollars to unlock real-time liquidity and capital efficiency.

The thesis of Long lines up with a wider post on the website of Ripple, where she mentions that within about five years, stablecoins will be completely amalgamated into global payment systems and function as the default settlement layer for holders and fintechs.

Meanwhile, other analysts mention that regulated stablecoins are increasingly being made to directly integrate into bank and card-network rails, obscuring the line between crypto infrastructure and traditional clearing systems.

The Further Forecasts

Long withstands that the industry is withdrawing completely from the speculative phase and setting its foot into what she calls a production era of crypto. She also mentions that after one of the most exciting years witnessed by crypto, the industry is going into its production era.

She has also forecasted that in this year, we will witness the institutionalisation of crypto-trusted infrastructure, and actual utility will propel banks, corporates and providers from pilots to scale.

Crypto is no longer unpredictable; it is the operating layer of modern finance, she further states in a follow-up post, speculating that about 50% of Fortune 500 companies will have some form of virtual asset exposure or a formal “DAT strategy” by this year.

She further proposes that they will comprise tokenised assets, on-chain treasury bills, stablecoins and programmable financial instruments implanted directly into corporate treasury and capital-markets workflows.

The written outlook of Long at Ripple associates these themes altogether, mentioning 2026 as a defining year in which stablecoins will power global settlement.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bhutan to Launch Sei Validator in Q1, Explores Tokenization Ties

TagsRippleStablecoinxrp

Related Questions

QWhat does Ripple's President, Monica Long, predict will be the foundation of global settlement?

AStablecoins will be the base of global settlement, not an alternative rail.

QAccording to the article, what is the role of stablecoins in the future of cross-border money movement?

AStablecoins will be the pillar of cross-border money movement, not just a side experiment.

QWhat does Monica Long call the new phase that the crypto industry is entering?

AShe calls it the 'production era' of crypto, moving away from the speculative phase.

QWhat percentage of Fortune 500 companies does Long speculate will have some form of virtual asset exposure by this year?

AAbout 50% of Fortune 500 companies will have some form of virtual asset exposure or a formal 'DAT strategy'.

QWhat year does the Ripple outlook mention as a defining year for stablecoins powering global settlement?

A2026 is mentioned as a defining year in which stablecoins will power global settlement.

Related Reads

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片