Rhythm X Zhihu Hong Kong Event Skills Recruitment, Sign Up Now for a Chance to Showcase On-Site

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-03Last updated on 2026-04-03

Abstract

Six months ago, "how to write good prompts" was the hottest topic in group chats. Now, that question is clearly outdated. It has been replaced by Skills. The shift was largely triggered by the emergence of OpenClaw, which brought the concept of AI agents into the mainstream. Unlike a smart search engine that answers questions in isolated interactions, an agent can plan, remember, and complete entire tasks autonomously, creating the novel feeling that it is genuinely working for you. This has led to the rise of Skills—specialized capabilities that equip agents to handle specific domains efficiently. Without Skills, an agent is like a smart but untrained newcomer; with them, it can execute complex, precision-sensitive workflows without constant guidance. Popular Skills currently spreading within communities focus on areas like workflow automation, domain-specific rule injection (e.g., for law, finance, or medicine), personalization, and even financial operations such as identifying arbitrage opportunities on Polymarket or executing quantitative trading strategies. This shifts the门槛 from requiring programming and financial expertise to simply installing a Skill. The underlying change is that people are starting to view agents as long-term collaborators, not just disposable tools. Now, with vibe coding, turning an idea into a functional Skill no longer requires a technical team, code, or infrastructure—it can be done over a weekend. The gap between a good idea and a working p...

Six months ago, "how to write good prompts" was the hottest topic in group chats. Now this question is clearly outdated. What has replaced prompts is Skills.

The most obvious tipping point for this shift was, of course, the emergence of OpenClaw.

Even if you could call it plagiarism, and it wasn't the original creator of the agent concept, it truly brought the concept of an agent into the mainstream view, closer to the AI you've seen in movies: possessing personality, able to remember things, capable of planning, and truly able to complete tasks for you, rather than just answering your questions.

In the past, when people used AI, they were essentially using a very smart search engine—you ask, it answers, and the next round starts fresh. The agent lengthens this thread. It actively pushes tasks forward, finds ways around obstacles, and after completing one step, it moves on to the next. The first time you see it actually handle a complete task, you get a strange feeling: this thing is really working for me.

Then people started thinking: how to make it more capable.

This is the real reason Skills have become popular. It's not because Skills themselves are particularly novel, but because the agent made people seriously consider this question for the first time. What Skills do is equip the agent with specialized capabilities.

Why are Skills so important now?

An agent without Skills is like a smart but completely uneducated newcomer. If you ask it to do financial analysis, it can think, but it's slow, prone to errors, and requires you to guide it step-by-step through many stages. Skills are equivalent to it having pre-learned the complete workflow of that field—it can get started immediately without you having to repeatedly correct it.

The most widely shared Skills in the community currently focus on a few areas: workflow automation, stringing together operations that originally required jumping between multiple tools into a chain the agent can run through on its own; injection of rules for professional fields, ensuring the agent doesn't improvise freely when performing tasks requiring high precision, like in law, medicine, or finance; personalized adaptation, tuning the agent to your most efficient way of working, remembering your preferences, language style, and judgment criteria; and, of course, a category of Skills related to money, such as trading.

Arbitrage opportunities on Polymarket are something the average person can't decipher from the order book, nor do they have the time to watch the trends and calculate price differences. But an agent equipped with specialized Skills can: monitor in real-time, identify discrepancies, judge whether to enter the market, running the entire suite without you needing any background knowledge in predicting markets.

The same goes for quantitative trading. In the past, this was the domain of investment banks and hedge funds, requiring writing strategy code, connecting APIs, and watching backtesting data. Now, people have packaged the entire process into Skills; an agent can install them and start executing strategies on exchanges. The barrier to entry has shifted from "knowing how to program and understanding finance" to "knowing how to install Skills".

This change isn't about making people lazier; it's about pushing the boundaries of capability outward.

Behind these needs lies a common logic: people are starting to seriously treat agents as long-term collaborators, not just tools to be closed after use.

So, what novel ideas do you have that you want to turn into a skill for your agent?

Before, you had an idea, you spotted a market gap, but couldn't implement it. You didn't know how to code, didn't have time to learn, hiring外包 was expensive and slow, and eventually that idea just rotted in your notes. Now it's different. Using vibe coding, you can directly shape your idea into a Skill—no need to make a webpage, no need to make an app, no server required, no maintenance team needed.

The underlying logic of this is: agents will be a necessity for everyone. The Skills you make don't need to find their own users; they naturally run on the agent that everyone is already using. The market is there, the channel is there, you just need to build the thing that nobody else has made yet.

Before, there was a technical team standing between "I have a good idea" and "I have a working product". Now that distance has been compressed to a weekend.

Related Questions

QWhat has replaced 'how to write good prompts' as the hottest topic in the community, according to the article?

ASkills have replaced 'how to write good prompts' as the hottest topic.

QWhat concept did OpenClaw bring into the mainstream, making AI more like the kind seen in movies?

AOpenClaw brought the concept of 'agent' into the mainstream, making AI more like a personalized, memory-capable, planning entity that can complete tasks.

QWhat is the primary function of Skills for an AI agent?

AThe primary function of Skills is to equip an AI agent with specialized capabilities, allowing it to perform specific tasks efficiently without constant guidance.

QWhat are some of the key areas where widely shared Skills are concentrated?

AWidely shared Skills are concentrated in workflow automation, injection of professional domain rules (like law, medicine, finance), personalization, and financial transactions.

QHow does the article describe the change in the barrier to creating a product from an idea?

AThe barrier has been compressed from needing a technical team to potentially 'a weekend' using vibe coding to create a Skill, eliminating the need for building a webpage, app, server, or maintenance team.

Related Reads

Deconstructing the U.S. Stock Quantum Computing Sector: IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, Which of These Concept Stocks is Worth Betting On?

**Title:** Analyzing the US Quantum Computing Race: IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave – Which Concept Stock is Worth Betting On? **Summary:** The podcast discusses the resurgence of quantum computing as a national priority for both the US and China, driven by its potential to break current encryption, revolutionize drug discovery, finance, and logistics. The core challenge is commercializing the technology, which is hampered by high error rates in quantum bits (qubits). Quantum error correction, requiring thousands of physical qubits per reliable logical qubit, is key but years away. The analysis compares three main publicly traded US quantum computing firms: * **IonQ (Ion Trap):** Considered the most financially stable with the fastest commercial progress (2025 revenue: $130M, +202%) and high-quality clients. Its valuation is very high, pricing in significant future growth. * **Rigetti (Superconducting):** Seen as the highest-risk, highest-potential-reward bet. It has the smallest revenue but recently launched a 108-qubit system. Its valuation multiples are extreme, making it highly sensitive to news. * **D-Wave (Quantum Annealing):** Has the most unique positioning with real-world enterprise clients today (e.g., Mastercard, Volkswagen) solving optimization problems. Its recent acquisition moves it into general-purpose quantum computing ("dual-platform"), adding execution risk. Major tech giants like Google, IBM, and Microsoft are also heavily invested, pursuing various technical approaches. Nvidia is positioning itself as the essential bridge between classical and quantum computing. The investment phase is likened to AI in 2018-2020: promising underlying technology with accelerating breakthroughs but a commercial inflection point still 3-7 years away, suggesting potential for a market correction ("bubble washout"). For investors, suggested approaches include gaining exposure through tech giants with quantum divisions (e.g., Google, IBM) or using niche ETFs like WQTM for pure-play quantum exposure, rather than direct stock picks in the highly volatile pure-play companies at this early stage.

marsbit11m ago

Deconstructing the U.S. Stock Quantum Computing Sector: IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, Which of These Concept Stocks is Worth Betting On?

marsbit11m ago

From Parallel Finance to Mainstream Finance: The On-Chain Securities Era Ushers in a Historic Window

From Parallel Finance to Mainstream: The Dawn of On-Chain Securities For over a decade, the crypto industry has operated as a parallel financial system with its own currencies, markets, and assets—from Bitcoin and ICOs to DeFi, NFTs, and memecoins. Despite building a robust internal ecosystem, a wall has separated it from the traditional financial world. That barrier is now crumbling. The industry's first act was one of internal evolution: ICOs streamlined fundraising, DeFi recreated financial services on-chain, and layer-2 networks competed for scalability—all within the crypto bubble. While innovative, this cycle remained closed, with capital and users circulating internally, leading to volatile boom-bust cycles. Even Bitcoin ETFs, while attracting Wall Street capital, merely provided a channel to buy crypto assets without bridging the systems. The next, larger narrative is Real-World Assets (RWA) moving on-chain. This involves tokenizing stocks, bonds, funds, and future cash flows. Blockchain can compress the complex traditional processes of trading, settlement, clearing, and custody into a seamless, automated network operating in seconds. This shift is creating a new financial gateway: the native crypto securities broker. This entity will combine functions of an exchange, broker, bank, and custodian into a unified global financial operating system. Consequently, the next major battleground won't be the "public chain wars" focused on speed and cost, but the competition to build the financial infrastructure capable of hosting high-quality, liquid real-world assets. Access to global equities, index funds, or stakes in companies like SpaceX could erase the boundary between crypto and traditional finance, unlocking a market orders of magnitude larger than crypto's current valuation. In summary, after years of creating a separate financial world, crypto's next decade will be defined by its integration into the existing global financial system, marking the true beginning of its largest growth story.

marsbit33m ago

From Parallel Finance to Mainstream Finance: The On-Chain Securities Era Ushers in a Historic Window

marsbit33m ago

Wang Chuan: When the Neighbor Old Wang Made 30x on Memory Stocks, How to Avoid Anxiety (Part Six) - The Trap of Commoditized Goods

Wang Chuan: When the Neighbor Lao Wang Made 30x on Storage Stocks, How to Stay Anxiety-Free (Part 6) - The Trap of Commoditized Goods. This essay uses historical and current examples to analyze the cyclical and high-risk nature of the data storage industry. It begins with the 1990s rise and dramatic fall of Iomega, whose stock soared over 160x in 18 months before collapsing 97% from its peak, illustrating the fleeting success of storage "meme stocks." The core problem is that storage products, like DRAM and flash memory, are highly commoditized. This leads to extreme volatility: prices have plummeted over 80% multiple times, and company stocks often crash 95% or go bankrupt. The industry's dynamic is defined by "elastic demand facing heavy-asset, long-cycle, rigid supply." When demand spikes and supply is fixed, prices skyrocket, as seen recently with AI-driven demand for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM). Companies like Sandisk and Micron have reported massive revenue and gross margin jumps (e.g., Sandisk's gross margin rising from 22.5% to 78.3%) despite minimal increases in production volume. However, these high margins are self-defeating. They incentivize massive new capacity investments (hundreds of billions planned from 2026), with supply expected to surge by late 2027. Once new supply meets demand, prices and profits will crash, potentially leading to a scenario where "selling more results in earning less." The article debunks the safety of long-term supply agreements, comparing them to fragile non-aggression pacts easily broken when market conditions shift. It warns that when an industry is highly profitable but trades at low P/E ratios, the risk is greatest, as plummeting prices quickly erase those earnings. Multiple asymmetric risks loom, including economic recession, reduced AI spending, faster-than-expected capacity expansion (especially from Chinese firms), and technological innovations that reduce memory requirements. In conclusion, the storage sector is a cyclical trap where periods of euphoric profits are often precursors to devastating downturns, luring unprepared investors into a "wealth incinerator."

marsbit42m ago

Wang Chuan: When the Neighbor Old Wang Made 30x on Memory Stocks, How to Avoid Anxiety (Part Six) - The Trap of Commoditized Goods

marsbit42m ago

Wang Chuan: When the neighbor Lao Wang earned thirty times from investing in memory storage stocks, how can you still avoid anxiety (6) - The trap of homogeneous products

The article, "Wang Chuan: How to Remain Unanxious After Neighbor Lao Wang's Thirty-Fold Gain on Storage Stocks (Part 6) - The Trap of Commoditized Goods," analyzes the cyclical and perilous nature of the data storage industry through historical and current case studies. It begins with the example of Iomega, whose Zip drives led to a stock surge of over 160x in the mid-1990s before collapsing over 97% from its peak due to competition from cheaper CD-R technology. This pattern is characteristic of storage, where products like DRAM are highly commoditized, leading to extreme price volatility. The sector has seen prices crash over 80% multiple times, with companies often facing bankruptcy. The core dynamic is "elastic demand facing heavy-asset, long-cycle, rigid supply." High prices attract new capacity, but the long lead time means supply eventually overshoots, causing sharp price corrections. The current AI-driven boom, exemplified by surging demand for High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), has led to skyrocketing prices and profit margins for companies like SanDisk and Micron, despite relatively flat production volumes. However, the author warns this high-margin environment is self-defeating. The high profits are already triggering massive new capacity investments (hundreds of billions starting 2026), with supply expected to ramp up by late 2027. When supply catches up, total revenue and profits may fall even as more units are sold. Long-term supply agreements offer little protection, as buyers can find ways to renegotiate if market prices drop, similar to fragile political treaties. Key risks include economic downturns, cuts in AI spending, faster-than-expected capacity expansion (especially from Chinese firms), and innovations in chip/algorithm design that reduce memory needs. A critical trap is that at the cycle's peak, storage stocks often appear cheap with low P/E ratios, luring value investors just before an impending downturn where profits evaporate. The conclusion cautions that for commoditized goods like storage, high margins inevitably destroy themselves, and the current asymmetry favors downside risk over further upside. The neighbor's dream of easy wealth from storage stocks is portrayed as a precarious illusion.

链捕手1h ago

Wang Chuan: When the neighbor Lao Wang earned thirty times from investing in memory storage stocks, how can you still avoid anxiety (6) - The trap of homogeneous products

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片