Report: DeepSeek Resumes Financing, Pre-money Valuation at 500 Billion Yuan

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-05Last updated on 2026-08-05

Abstract

Several transaction sources revealed to Caijing that AI company DeepSeek has restarted its second round of financing, aiming to raise 50 billion yuan with a pre-money valuation of approximately 500 billion yuan. The signing is planned for late August. DeepSeek completed its first funding round of 50 billion yuan in June with a valuation over 350 billion yuan, marking the largest first-round financing in China's AI large model history. The second round was reportedly paused in late July, partly due to the founder's dissatisfaction with leaked investor meeting details circulating online. It has since been restarted with a desire for a more discreet process. The second-round valuation represents a 43% increase from the first round. If successful, DeepSeek will have raised over 100 billion yuan across both rounds. Investor interest remains high; the first round saw over 100 billion yuan in expressed intent, leaving significant unmet demand. DeepSeek's fundraising scale surpasses competitors like Moonshot AI, which recently raised funds at a $31.5 billion valuation and is planning a Pre-IPO round. Market pricing for these model companies is seen more as an "option" on reaching AGI rather than based on traditional financial metrics. Regarding model development, DeepSeek recently publicly tested the DeepSeek-V4-Flash official version in late July, featuring enhanced Agent capabilities and strong performance on benchmarks. It follows a high-value, low-cost strategy, with its pric...

Multiple sources involved in the deals revealed to *Caijing* that the large model company DeepSeek has resumed its second round of financing. This round plans to raise 50 billion yuan, with a pre-money valuation of approximately 500 billion yuan, and aims to complete the signing in late August.

DeepSeek initiated its first round of financing in April this year and completed the closing in June. That round raised 50 billion yuan with a valuation exceeding 350 billion yuan, making it the company with the largest first-round financing scale in the history of Chinese AI large models.

Multiple investors mentioned that DeepSeek's second round of financing had started at least by mid-July, but was suddenly paused at the end of July. At that time, some investors on the negotiation waitlist were informed that plans to sign financing agreements were temporarily on hold.

According to media reports on July 26, one reason for DeepSeek pausing its second round of financing was that DeepSeek's founder, Liang Wenfeng, was dissatisfied with widely circulated online remarks, which mainly revolved around a suspected leaked "meeting transcript for investors."

Caijing sought confirmation from DeepSeek regarding the above market information but received no response as of press time.

The aforementioned deal sources told *Caijing* that DeepSeek and the investors currently at the negotiating table hope this financing round can proceed discreetly after resuming. Currently, some investment institutions that were actively engaging earlier indicated they have not yet received news of DeepSeek resuming financing, and the channel remains in a suspended state.

According to multiple deal sources, the negotiation list for the second round of financing includes both institutions that were "unsuccessful" in the first round and VC (venture capital) and industrial capital that participated in the first round and are considering additional investment. The investors in DeepSeek's first round of financing were: the National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund, Tencent, CATL and Puquan Capital, NetEase, JD.com, Lichen Capital, IDG Capital, Zhenxingu Investment, and Shixiang Capital.

Since opening for financing, DeepSeek's shares have been in high demand. An investor involved in the deals told *Caijing* that the scale of funds expressing investment interest in the first round around DeepSeek exceeded 1 trillion yuan. Ultimately, 500 billion yuan was raised, meaning there were at least another 500 billion yuan in funds holding intent to enter. These fund providers continued to compete for new shares after the second round opened.

The pre-money valuation for the second round of financing is 500 billion yuan, an increase of approximately 43% compared to the first round. If this round proceeds smoothly, DeepSeek will have raised over 1 trillion yuan across two financing rounds.

DeepSeek's financing scale far exceeds that of its competitors, including Moonshot AI, which has seen heated financing activity recently. These star AI large model companies have significantly accelerated their financing pace this year.

Moonshot AI completed its Series F financing at the end of July with a valuation of approximately $31.5 billion (equivalent to about 2.1 trillion yuan) and immediately initiated a new pre-IPO financing round at a $50 billion valuation after that round closed. According to informed sources, Moonshot AI's current pre-IPO round is expected to complete in August and file for listing within this year.

Alongside financing developments, the model releases from these star companies also stir market sentiment. Model capability and efficiency directly relate to the primary market's valuation of model companies. In an era where model iteration speed is measured in months and leaderboard rankings change weekly, investors hope to secure a ticket on the ship that first reaches AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) amidst uncertainty. A deal source believes, "Valuing large models is essentially an option, not a financial model based on cash flow."

According to previous *Caijing* reports, the Series F financing initiated by Moonshot AI in June initially saw lukewarm interest, with many channels receiving allocations "unsold for several days." At that time, even secondary market transactions at a $18 billion valuation were circulating. However, after the release of its new flagship model Kimi K3 and its global acclaim, its shares suddenly became highly sought-after, with some sellers of secondary shares even raising prices.

An investor close to DeepSeek told *Caijing* in late July that the pressure on DeepSeek to train new models recently has not been small. The official version of DeepSeek-V4, originally scheduled for release in mid-July, only launched for public beta in the latest official API documentation log on July 31. However, only V4-Flash debuted; the official version of V4-Pro has not yet been released, with a specific public beta time still unannounced.

According to official documentation, DeepSeek-V4-Flash made no adjustments to model architecture or parameter size. Instead, it strengthened post-training on the original foundation, significantly enhancing its Agent capabilities, with multiple benchmark tests far exceeding the V4-Flash preview version released in April.

According to the latest Intelligence Index released by the independent third-party AI model evaluation platform Artificial Analysis, the intelligence level of DeepSeek-V4-Flash official version reached 50 points, ranking second domestically only to Zhipu's GLM-5.2 at 51 points, and higher than the average level of similar models. DeepSeek continues its model strategy of "low cost, high cost-effectiveness." The price for V4-Flash output per million Tokens is $0.28, lower than Zhipu GLM-5.2's pricing of $4.29 per million Tokens output.

With rising demand for inference computing power and continuously pushing costs higher, many large model companies are pursuing extreme inference efficiency. Domestically, companies following a high cost-effectiveness route also include Tencent's Hunyuan. Recently, the American AI model company OpenAI also announced price reductions for its GPT-5.6 series model API calls, with the entry-level model Luna reduced by 80%. Before the release of the DeepSeek-V4-Flash official version, GPT-5.6's cost-effectiveness was even higher than DeepSeek's for the same model capability. However, this cost-effectiveness advantage was quickly eliminated.

On the latest OpenRouter chart, an AI model aggregation platform for global developers, DeepSeek-V4-Flash official version ranked first this week with 7.1 trillion Tokens consumed.

Related Questions

QWhat are the key details of DeepSeek's second round of financing according to the article?

AAccording to the article, DeepSeek has restarted its second round of financing. The plan is to raise 50 billion yuan with a pre-money valuation of approximately 500 billion yuan. The signing is scheduled for late August. This valuation represents an increase of about 43% compared to the first round. If successful, DeepSeek would have raised over 100 billion yuan across two rounds.

QWhy was DeepSeek's second round of financing reportedly paused in July?

AThe article states that the second round of financing was paused in late July. One reason cited was that DeepSeek's founder, Liang Wenfeng, was dissatisfied with widely circulated online remarks, primarily surrounding a leaked 'meeting transcript for investors.'

QWho were the investors in DeepSeek's first funding round?

AThe investors in DeepSeek's first funding round were: the National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund, Tencent, Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL), Puquan Capital, NetEase, JD.com, Lisi Capital, IDG Capital, Zhenxingu Capital, and Shixiang Capital.

QHow does DeepSeek's financing and valuation compare to its competitor Moonshot AI?

ADeepSeek's financing scale surpasses that of its competitors, including Moonshot AI (Kimi). DeepSeek's second-round pre-money valuation is 500 billion yuan. In contrast, Moonshot AI completed a Series F financing in late July with a valuation of approximately $31.5 billion (around 210 billion yuan) and immediately initiated a new Pre-IPO round with a $50 billion valuation.

QWhat are the reported performance details and market positioning of the newly released DeepSeek-V4-Flash model?

AAccording to the article, the officially released DeepSeek-V4-Flash model did not change its architecture or parameter size but enhanced post-training, significantly improving its Agent capabilities. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it scored 50 points, second domestically only to Zhipu's GLM-5.2 (51 points). It maintains a high cost-performance ratio, with a price of $0.28 per million output tokens, lower than GLM-5.2's $4.29. On OpenRouter, DeepSeek-V4-Flash ranked first in weekly token consumption with 7.1 trillion tokens.

Related Reads

Michael Saylor: Bitcoin Halved, My Digital Credit is Making Money

Michael Saylor discusses Bitcoin, digital credit, and corporate treasury strategies in a recent roundtable. He explains that while Bitcoin remains "digital capital" with no counterparty risk, its ~40% annual volatility makes it unsuitable for most institutional and retail capital. To attract this capital, he advocates for Bitcoin-backed "digital credit" and "digital currency" products. These offer low volatility against fiat currencies, generate yield, and compete with traditional money market funds, stablecoins, and other yield-bearing crypto assets. Saylor clarifies that these products are not meant to replace direct Bitcoin ownership but to onboard capital that otherwise wouldn't enter the Bitcoin ecosystem. He provides examples: during a period when Bitcoin fell 50%, his company's digital credit products (STRC, SATA) delivered positive returns of 3-4%, demonstrating their ability to strip out ~90% of Bitcoin's volatility. He frames "digital currency" as a fiat-referenced, yield-bearing, stable-value asset backed by Bitcoin, designed to meet the needs of the global capital pool. This approach, he argues, can expand the Bitcoin network's reach by 10x to 100x more effectively than pure education. The discussion also covers corporate finance for Bitcoin treasury companies. Saylor argues that equity issuance is not inherently dilutive if done above net asset value per share and if the acquired asset (Bitcoin or cash) supports future value creation. He distinguishes between debt with maturity dates and hybrid capital like preferred shares (e.g., STRC), which offer issuer options and do not force liquidation. Evaluating these companies requires modeling based on future Bitcoin price and volatility assumptions, not relying on a single metric like mNAV (market-adjusted net asset value). The business models are still evolving, and investors must analyze full disclosures to form a complete view.

marsbit2h ago

Michael Saylor: Bitcoin Halved, My Digital Credit is Making Money

marsbit2h ago

Getting Ahead of the Tide and Drowning First: The Fall of 'Crypto x AI' Pioneer ai16z

"ai16z, an early pioneer of the 'crypto x AI' narrative, has officially shut down. In late 2024, its token launch sparked a massive speculative frenzy around AI Agent tokens, briefly propelling the project to a $2.6 billion valuation. However, by 2026, as functional AI agents from companies like Anthropic and OpenAI became mainstream reality, the crypto-native AI projects built largely on hype began to collapse. The founder of its underlying project, Eliza OS, announced the termination in a bitter post, citing legal threats from token holders and a depleted foundation. He expressed disillusionment with the crypto community, contrasting it with the 'optimistic' builders in pure AI. While the Eliza framework itself remains active as open-source software—ironically with contributions from AI like Claude—the token-dependent venture failed. The story highlights a core flaw: the crypto market often prices narratives far ahead of functional technology. When the promised AI future arrived, it was delivered by traditional tech companies with sustainable business models, not token projects. The episode suggests the initial path of 'tokenizing AI concepts' is broken. However, integration may still occur in reverse—with AI tools enhancing crypto analytics and trading—or in coordinating real resources like decentralized compute, as seen in projects like Bittensor and Render."

marsbit2h ago

Getting Ahead of the Tide and Drowning First: The Fall of 'Crypto x AI' Pioneer ai16z

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片