Pump.fun Launches Direct Investment, Spending $3 Million to Buy 12 New Memes

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

Pump.fun, a leading Meme token launch platform, has announced the creation of its investment arm, Pump Fund. The fund will launch its first initiative, the Build in Public (BiP) hackathon, this month. With a total allocation of $3 million, it plans to invest $250,000 into each of 12 new tokens launched on its platform, valuing each project at $10 million. Beyond funding, selected projects will receive mentorship from Pump.fun’s founders and additional resources. This marks Pump.fun’s first direct financial endorsement of specific Meme tokens, signaling strong support for promising new projects. The platform, known for its substantial revenue—reportedly over $954.8 million historically—aims to reinvest in the ecosystem beyond token buybacks. The BiP hackathon encourages founders to publicly build products after launching a token on Pump.fun. Key requirements include retaining at least 10% of the token supply and maintaining active communication with supporters via social media and live streams. Project selection will prioritize organic user growth, genuine market appeal, and long-term sustainability over hype. Applications opened on January 19 and will run for 30 days. The first winning projects will be announced on February 18, though the program will continue indefinitely. For those tracking potential opportunities, new tokens on Pump.fun—especially those tagged with Pump Fund or BiP—are worth monitoring closely in the coming weeks.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

On the morning of January 20, Pump.fun officially announced the launch of its investment division, Pump Fund. Pump Fund will initiate its first project, the Build in Public (BiP) hackathon, this month, investing $3 million in 12 new tokens issued through the platform, with $250,000 allocated to each token, corresponding to a valuation of $10 million. In addition to financial support, Pump.fun will also provide professional guidance from its founders and other substantial resources.

As the project with the strongest revenue-generating capability in the entire Meme sector, this is the first time Pump.fun has openly expressed its support for specific Meme tokens through official channels with real money (the attitude may be more important than the funding scale). Therefore, the selected tokens are highly likely to become the seed candidates in the Meme sector in the coming period.

Pump.fun's Revenue-Generating Capability

Pump.fun's staggering revenue capability is no secret. Data compiled by analyst Adam (@Adam_Tehc) on Dune shows that Pump.fun's historical total revenue has reached $954.8 million. Although daily revenue has significantly declined as the Meme hype cooled, it still amounts to hundreds of thousands of dollars per day.

Holding massive real funds, Pump.fun is exploring other paths for ecosystem feedback beyond PUMP token buybacks. Pump Fund and its affiliated BiP hackathon are Pump.fun's latest attempts.

BiP Hackathon Details

According to the description on the BiP hackathon's dedicated page, the project aims to support founders who issue tokens on Pump.fun and publicly build products. Unlike traditional hackathons where participants rely on VCs or judges for evaluation to compete for prizes, the BiP hackathon intends to introduce token performance as a variable, allowing the market to determine whether a project is worth advancing and enabling users to become the earliest investors.

When discussing this key difference, Pump.fun founder Alon stated in an X post: "Before Pump.fun, my co-founder and I tried many different ideas. Consumer finance, DeFi, SocialFi, NFTs—but all failed. One of the biggest problems we encountered was that we found it extremely difficult to get our products in front of users. Trying to reach the right user base was an incredibly tedious task..."

Specifically, the BiP hackathon requires:

  • Participants must issue a token on Pump.fun and then publicly build a product;
  • Participants must also hold at least 10% of the token supply to align interests;
  • Finally, the event strongly encourages founders to speak publicly on social media like X or livestream on Pump.fun to maintain effective communication with the community.

As for the types of participating projects, Pump.fun imposes no restrictions; they are not even limited to cryptocurrency-related products. Projects from different market stages and various verticals can participate.

Regarding how the 12 winning projects will ultimately be selected, Pump.fun did not provide specific rules but pointed out two main principles: First, organic user growth and genuine appeal are preferred over connections and flashy promotions; second, in addition to the appeal of the product itself/social media, the long-term sustainability of the project will also be evaluated.

Key Timelines to Note

According to the BiP hackathon's schedule, applications opened on January 19. Participants are required to launch their tokens at the time of application and begin public building (including livestreaming development progress, regularly sharing updates, and maintaining community interaction). The application window will be open for 30 days. On February 18, Pump.fun will announce the first batch of winning projects and provide funding (at least one will be announced). Considering that some projects may need more time to gain market attention and demonstrate appeal, the program will continue to run long-term.

So the timeline is clear: if you want to spot potential opportunities among this batch of Meme tokens, you need to start paying attention to newly issued tokens on Pump.fun from now on, especially those with the Pump Fund or BiP labels. Although the first batch of winning tokens won't be announced until 30 days later, tokens likely to be selected by Pump.fun will inevitably show competitiveness before then.

Overall, while Pump.fun's event may not drive a collective sentiment recovery in the Meme market, it can at least contribute some new tokens with clearer evaluation dimensions.

Related Questions

QWhat is the purpose of Pump Fund's first project, the Build in Public (BiP) hackathon?

AThe BiP hackathon aims to support founders who launch tokens on Pump.fun and publicly build products. It will invest $3 million in 12 new tokens, with $250,000 per token at a $10 million valuation, and provide professional guidance and resources.

QHow much total revenue has Pump.fun generated historically according to data analyst Adam?

APump.fun's historical total revenue has reached $954.8 million.

QWhat are the key requirements for participants in the BiP hackathon?

AParticipants must issue a token on Pump.fun, publicly build a product, hold at least 10% of the token supply to align interests, and are strongly encouraged to communicate publicly on social media like X or via live streams on Pump.fun.

QWhen will Pump.fun announce the first batch of winning projects for the BiP hackathon?

APump.fun will announce the first batch of winning projects on February 18, after the 30-day application window that started on January 19.

QWhat principles will Pump.fun use to select the 12 winning projects in the BiP hackathon?

ASelection will prioritize organic growth and genuine user attraction over relationships and flashy marketing, and will evaluate projects based on long-term sustainability alongside product and social media appeal.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit3m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit3m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片