Psy Protocol Achieves 521,000 TPS on a Live Proof-of-Work Network, Offers $100,000 Bounty to Anyone Who Can Prove the Results Invalid

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-14Last updated on 2026-02-14

Hong Kong | February 11, 2026 — Psy Protocol today announced that it has achieved 521,000 transactions per second (TPS) on a live, on-chain verifiable Proof-of-Work (PoW) network. The team stated that this result, achieved without sacrificing decentralization, security, or privacy, surpasses all publicly benchmarked performances of mainstream Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Proof-of-Work chains to date.

The stress test was conducted on thousands of Google Cloud instances to simulate a high-concurrency, internet-scale operating environment. Every transaction in the benchmark is backed by cryptographic proof, and the complete dataset has been published for independent verification.

To demonstrate confidence in the results, Psy Protocol has publicly posted a $100,000 (US$100,000) bounty, to be awarded to any individual or team that can invalidate this throughput result based on the published proof materials.

"This is not a devnet demo, nor a theoretical projection," said Carter Feldman, Founder and CEO of Psy Protocol. "Every single result is verifiable. If we are wrong, the math will show it—and we will pay $100,000 to the person who shows it."

Why 521,000 TPS Matters Now

High-throughput benchmarks are not uncommon in the crypto industry. Psy Protocol believes this result is structurally significant because of the use-case context it addresses.

Blockchains were originally designed around human transaction patterns: sporadically occurring activities, manual approvals, and low concurrency. However, this model is becoming increasingly mismatched as millions of autonomous AI agents transact, collaborate, and settle at machine speeds continuously in the future.

When networks designed for human-scale usage encounter sustained machine-grade demand, the result is often network congestion, soaring fees, and cascading bottlenecks. Psy Protocol views 521,000 TPS as the "baseline" infrastructure required for a machine-native economy, not a performance ceiling.

How the Architecture Works

Most blockchains require every node to re-execute every transaction, a design that imposes a hard architectural ceiling on throughput. Psy Protocol removes this bottleneck through four synergistic design choices:

  • Parallel State Architecture (PARTH): Each user operates in isolated state partitions. This eliminates global state contention, allowing thousands of state transitions to be processed simultaneously without conflict.
  • Client-Side Proof Generation: Transaction execution and proof generation are performed on the user's device, with sensitive data always remaining under the user's control. Miners are only responsible for verifying and aggregating proofs, not re-executing transactions, thus eliminating redundant computation across the entire network.
  • Recursive Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Individual transaction proofs are recursively folded into a single succinct proof per block. As transaction volume grows, verification costs grow logarithmically rather than linearly, meaning massive throughput increases do not require proportional increases in resources.
  • Horizontal Scaling via Realms: The network scales by adding parallel processing domains ("Realms") and proof aggregation capacity. Throughput increases linearly with added infrastructure, rather than being limited by a fixed architectural cap.

Psy Protocol states that 521,000 TPS reflects the result in the current test configuration; higher throughput is achievable by scaling parallel proof generation capacity.

Verification: Open Data, Verifiable on Consumer Hardware

Because verification relies on succinct recursive proofs rather than full re-execution, Psy Protocol states that any combined proof from the benchmark can be independently verified on consumer-grade hardware—including limited-performance devices like a Raspberry Pi.

The complete test methodology, ZK circuit data, and combined proofs have all been open-sourced and are available at:

https://st8.psy.xyz/explorer

Applications Feasible at This Scale

With sustained throughput exceeding 500,000 TPS, the following new types of on-chain activity become feasible:

  • High-frequency micropayments between autonomous agents
  • Continuous clearing markets with real-time settlement replacing discrete batch settlement
  • High-density coordination among large-scale AI agent swarms operating without human intervention
  • Keyless agent execution via programmable signature circuits, eliminating reliance on human-controlled private keys or third-party custody

About Psy Protocol

Psy Protocol is building a Proof-of-Work smart contract platform for the "agentic internet." Its architecture combines the security and decentralization benefits of Proof-of-Work with the throughput and fee efficiency historically associated with Proof-of-Stake systems. Psy employs a "Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW)" consensus model, where miners perform cryptographically productive work—namely, aggregating and verifying zero-knowledge proofs—rather than arbitrary hash puzzle computations.

Related Questions

QWhat is the TPS (Transactions Per Second) achieved by Psy Protocol in a real-world Proof-of-Work network, and what is the bounty offered for disproving this result?

APsy Protocol achieved 521,000 TPS in a real-world, verifiable Proof-of-Work network. They have offered a $100,000 bounty to anyone who can prove this result is invalid based on the published cryptographic proofs.

QAccording to the article, why is achieving 521,000 TPS particularly significant in the current context of blockchain technology?

AIt is significant because it addresses the future need for a 'machine-native economy.' Traditional blockchains designed for sporadic human transactions are inadequate for the continuous, high-speed transactions of millions of autonomous AI agents. This result represents a baseline for the infrastructure required to support such activity without congestion or high fees.

QName two of the four key architectural designs that Psy Protocol uses to remove the throughput bottleneck found in most blockchains.

ATwo of the four designs are: 1. Parallel State Architecture (PARTH), which isolates state partitions to eliminate global state contention, and 2. Client-side proof generation, where users execute transactions and generate proofs on their own devices, so miners only verify and aggregate proofs instead of re-executing transactions.

QHow can the results of Psy Protocol's benchmark test be independently verified, and what kind of hardware is sufficient for this verification?

AThe results can be independently verified using the complete test methodology, ZK circuit data, and composite proofs that have been open-sourced. This verification can be performed on consumer-grade hardware, including limited devices like a Raspberry Pi, because it relies on verifying succinct recursive proofs rather than fully re-executing all transactions.

QWhat type of consensus model does Psy Protocol use, and what useful work do the miners perform instead of solving arbitrary hash puzzles?

APsy Protocol uses a Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW) consensus model. Instead of performing arbitrary hash calculations, miners perform cryptographically productive work by aggregating and verifying zero-knowledge proofs.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit4m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit4m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit11m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit11m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit20m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit20m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit23m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit23m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit25m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片