Profits Fall by a Quarter: Why Tether Abandoned Its $20 Billion Financing Plan

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-05Last updated on 2026-02-05

Abstract

In the face of a cooling crypto market and investor skepticism, Tether, the world's largest stablecoin issuer, has significantly scaled back its ambitious fundraising plans. Initially targeting $15-20 billion, which would have valued the company at $500 billion, the firm is now considering raising only about $5 billion. CEO Paolo Ardoino downplayed the original target, calling it a "misunderstanding" and a maximum cap, not a goal, while emphasizing that Tether is highly profitable and doesn't urgently need the capital. Despite the success of its USDT stablecoin, which has a market cap of approximately $185 billion, Tether faces persistent investor caution. Concerns revolve around its $500 billion valuation—comparable to major AI firms and SpaceX—ongoing regulatory scrutiny, and the lack of a full independent audit, relying instead on quarterly attestations. Ardoino defended the valuation, contrasting Tether's substantial profits with the losses of highly-valued AI companies. While new U.S. stablecoin legislation and competitor Circle's IPO have boosted momentum, regulatory risks and Tether's controversial history remain hurdles. The company's profits fell by about a quarter in 2025, attributed to declining Bitcoin prices, though it gained $8-10 billion from its gold holdings. Tether's massive scale has made it a major player in U.S. Treasuries and gold markets, positioning it as a critical bridge between traditional finance and the volatile crypto world.

Editor's Note: Against the backdrop of a cooling crypto market and pressured valuation narratives, Tether finds itself in a delicate position. On one hand, the continued expansion of USDT has made it an undeniable 'new financial player' in the U.S. Treasury and gold markets. On the other hand, a lofty $500 billion valuation expectations, an incomplete comprehensive audit, and long-standing regulatory and compliance controversies continue to make potential investors cautious.

Tether's next move may reflect not only its own choices but also the practical boundaries the entire stablecoin industry is facing.

The following is the original text:

As investors expressed skepticism about its $500 billion valuation target, the CEO of Tether, the world's largest stablecoin issuer, proactively downplayed expectations and attention regarding its financing scale.

This crypto group, registered in El Salvador, initiated financing negotiations last year, planning to raise $15 to $20 billion. Had the deal been completed, it would have placed Tether among the world's most valuable private companies.

But according to informed sources, after encountering investor hesitation, Tether's advisors have begun exploring the possibility of raising only about $5 billion.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino downplayed the potential financing scale, calling the previously stated $15 to $20 billion target "a misunderstanding."

"That number was not our target; it was just the maximum we were willing to sell," he said in an interview. "We would be equally happy not selling a single cent."

Ardoino stated that Tether is highly profitable and has received "significant interest" at the $500 billion valuation level. He added that the company has not yet decided how much equity to sell, partly because insiders are reluctant to reduce their holdings.

The company's dollar-pegged stablecoin, USDT, currently has a scale of approximately $1.85 trillion and is regarded as the "reserve currency" of the digital asset market. Control of Tether is concentrated in the hands of a small group of long-serving executives.

The market has been closely watching Tether's progress in attracting well-known investors, seeing it as a key indicator of investor interest in the crypto industry. It is widely believed that this move is more about consolidating Tether's credibility and network, as the company, generating billions of dollars in profit annually, does not urgently need new capital.

Following Trump's election as president, the market was once boosted by expectations of a more friendly U.S. regulatory environment for digital assets. However, over the past six months, as traders retreated from high-risk speculative assets, the crypto market has seen a significant pullback.

Some investors have privately expressed concerns about the $500 billion valuation, which would place Tether among the top private companies globally, alongside AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, as well as Musk's SpaceX and TikTok's parent company ByteDance.

Ardoino argued that Tether—which disclosed profits of approximately $10 billion last year, primarily from returns on the asset reserves backing USDT's value—deserves a valuation comparable to these still-unprofitable AI model companies.

"These AI companies make about the same amount of money as we do, just with a huge minus sign in front," he said. "If you're willing to believe an AI company with a massive minus sign in front is worth $800 billion, that's your choice."

Both Tether and its financing advisor, Cantor Fitzgerald, declined to comment on the size of this financing. The investment bank, run by the children of U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, also holds a stake in Tether.

Informed sources cautioned that the negotiations are ongoing and the financing terms could still change; if the overall crypto market strengthens again, investor sentiment could also reverse.

Ardoino stated that the new U.S. stablecoin legislation signed into law by Trump, coupled with the listing of U.S. rival Circle last year, has further increased market attention and momentum for Tether. Tether recently also launched a new token in the U.S. that complies with this regulatory framework.

But informed sources said some potential investors remain cautious about the regulatory risks surrounding Tether. Since its founding in 2014, this crypto group has long faced scrutiny, with controversies primarily focusing on whether its tokens are used for illegal activities and the transparency and quality of its asset reserves.

In recent years, Tether has begun publishing quarterly reserve attestations by the accounting firm BDO Italia, but it has never undergone a full independent audit.

Ardoino stated that the company has demonstrated the depth of its technical tools for collaboration with various law enforcement agencies to potential investors, to prove its capabilities in compliance and law enforcement cooperation.

S&P Global Ratings downgraded Tether's reserve rating to the lowest tier in its system late last year, citing its increasing exposure to high-risk assets like Bitcoin and gold. In response, Ardoino said at the time: "We wear your disdain as a badge of honor."

Since 2020, the growth of USDT has significantly accelerated, making Tether one of the world's largest buyers of U.S. Treasuries and, in recent months, a major player in the gold market.

Asset allocation on such a massive scale makes Tether one of the most critical connecting nodes between the global financial system and the highly volatile world of cryptocurrency.

Compared to the previous year, Tether's profits for 2025 fell by about a quarter. Ardoino attributed this change to the decline in Bitcoin's price. He added that the company gained approximately $8 to $10 billion in profits from its gold holdings, benefiting from rising precious metal prices.

Related Questions

QWhy did Tether significantly scale back its fundraising target from up to $20 billion to potentially only $5 billion?

ATether's CEO, Paolo Ardoino, stated that the initial $15-20 billion figure was a 'misunderstanding' and represented the maximum they were *willing* to sell, not a target. Investor hesitation over the company's $500 billion valuation and internal shareholders' reluctance to sell their stakes contributed to the reduced scale.

QWhat was the primary reason for Tether's 25% profit decline in 2025, according to its CEO?

APaolo Ardoino attributed the approximately 25% profit decline in 2025 primarily to a decrease in the price of Bitcoin.

QWhat are the main regulatory and transparency concerns that make some potential investors cautious about Tether?

APotential investors are cautious due to Tether's long history of scrutiny over whether its tokens are used for illicit activity, the transparency and quality of its asset reserves, and the fact that it has not undergone a full independent audit, relying instead on quarterly attestations from BDO Italia.

QHow does Tether's CEO justify the company's proposed $500 billion valuation compared to major AI companies?

APaolo Ardoino argues that Tether, which is highly profitable, deserves a valuation comparable to major AI companies that are still reporting losses, stating, 'These AI companies make about the same money as us, just with a big minus sign in front.'

QWhat two major roles does Tether now play in the broader financial system, according to the article?

ATether has become one of the world's largest buyers of U.S. Treasury bonds and a significant participant in the gold market. This makes it a critical connecting node between the global financial system and the highly volatile world of cryptocurrencies.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit22m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit22m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit41m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit41m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit50m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit50m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片