Premu Opens User-Created, Leveraged Prediction Markets Ahead of the 2026 World Cup

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-06-04Last updated on 2026-06-04

Abstract

Premu, a decentralized prediction market platform, is launching user-created prediction markets ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Unlike centralized platforms, Premu allows any participant to create a yes-or-no market on tournament outcomes—like which team advances or wins a match—by posting a USDC bond. Market creators earn a fee on every trade. Positions can be traded with up to 2.5x leverage, with settlement in USDC on Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base networks. The feature aims to keep pace with fast-moving event demand. Premu supports markets beyond sports, including crypto, politics, and rapid 5-minute price direction markets. The platform is globally accessible via its web application.

Stockholm, Sweden, June 4th, 2026, Chainwire

Decentralized prediction market platform lets participants launch their own World Cup markets, trade with leverage of up to 2.5x, and earn fees on the markets they create.

With the 2026 FIFA World Cup set to begin on June 11, Premu, a decentralized prediction market platform, is highlighting the feature that distinguishes it from centrally operated venues: any participant can create a market on a World Cup outcome, set it live, and earn a share of the fees generated by trading in that market.

Rather than waiting for a platform to list a contract, participants on Premu can launch a yes-or-no market on questions such as which team advances from a group, who reaches the final, or the result of a single fixture. Markets are created permissionlessly by posting a bond in USDC, and the creator earns a fee on every trade placed in the market. Positions can be traded with leverage of up to 2.5 times using isolated or cross margin, with activity settled on-chain in USDC across the Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base networks.

The timing coincides with rising interest in prediction markets, which have moved from a niche tool into wider public view over the past year as participants turn to event-based markets for forecasting and information. Major sporting events have historically drawn some of the highest trading activity to these platforms, and the World Cup, a 104-match tournament running through July 19, ranks among the largest such events on the 2026 calendar.

“Sporting events like the World Cup tend to generate questions faster than any central team can list them,” said Chadi Farhat, Chief Technology Officer at Premu. “Allowing participants to create their own markets, and to earn from the activity they bring, means the platform can keep pace with each stage of a tournament as it unfolds.”

Comparisons such as Polymarket vs Kalshi have featured prominently in industry discussion, drawing attention to differences in market structure, regulatory approach, and how markets are listed across centralized and decentralized models. Premu positions itself as a decentralized prediction market in which the market list is defined by participants themselves rather than a central operator, an approach the company says suits fast-moving events where demand can shift between fixtures.

Beyond sports, the platform supports markets across cryptocurrency, politics, culture, technology, economics, and global events, including rapid five-minute markets on the price direction of assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. Balances are held in on-chain vault contracts that can be independently verified, and deposits and withdrawals are recorded as on-chain events rather than processed through a custodial intermediary.

The Premu platform is available globally through its web application at https://premu.xyz.

About Premu

Premu is a decentralized prediction market platform that enables participants to create and trade markets based on real-world events. The platform combines permissionless, user-created markets with leveraged event trading and on-chain settlement in USDC across the Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base networks, supporting a range of event categories.

Contact

Mr
Chadi
Premu
team@premu.xyz

Related Questions

QWhat key feature distinguishes Premu from centrally operated prediction market platforms according to the article?

AThe key distinguishing feature is that any participant can create a market on a World Cup outcome, set it live, and earn a share of the fees generated by trading in that market. The market list is defined by participants themselves rather than a central operator.

QOn which blockchain networks does Premu settle its trading activity?

APremu settles trading activity on-chain in USDC across the Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base networks.

QWhat is the maximum leverage that traders can use on Premu for World Cup prediction markets?

APositions on Premu can be traded with leverage of up to 2.5 times using isolated or cross margin.

QAccording to Premu's CTO Chadi Farhat, why does allowing users to create markets suit an event like the World Cup?

AChadi Farhat states that sporting events like the World Cup generate questions faster than any central team can list them. Allowing participants to create their own markets and earn from the activity enables the platform to keep pace with each stage of the tournament as it unfolds.

QBesides sports, what other categories of markets does the Premu platform support?

ABeyond sports, the Premu platform supports markets across cryptocurrency, politics, culture, technology, economics, and global events, including rapid five-minute markets on the price direction of assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana.

Related Reads

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit1h ago

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit1h ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit1h ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit1h ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit1h ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片