Polygon: After deflation and network adoption, can POL’s price reset in 2026?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-06Last updated on 2026-01-06

Abstract

Polygon's POL token, despite minimal price gains in 2025's bull market, saw record-breaking network adoption with 1.4 billion annual transactions and daily transactions stabilizing above 5 million. CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlights a significant deflationary mechanism, with 1 million POL burned daily from fees—potentially burning 3.5% of the total supply annually. This, combined with high staking levels (3.6 billion POL staked), reduces inflation and increases scarcity, historically correlating with price increases. POL starting 2026 with a 21% price surge to $0.126 suggests potential for further growth, targeting $0.15 short-term, contingent on sustained momentum and deflationary pressure.

While the crypto market boomed in 2025 amid widespread adoption, Polygon recorded minimal to no gains on its price charts.

Even though POL underperformed, its network usage and adoption rate reached record-breaking levels.

As a result, Polygon’s CEO was left dreaming of a resurrective 2026, building on the gains realized so far.

Is 2026 really the year of Polygon’s resurrection?

According to Polygon’s CEO, Sandeep Nailwal, the network is currently on its S-curve, driven by fee generation.

Sandeep posited that the network has recorded a massive surge in fees, mostly spent on token burns. As such, 1 million POL tokens have been burned daily over the past 3-4 days through fees accrued on the network.

In fact, over the past three months, the network’s daily fees and revenue surged 425% to $115k, most of which was spent on burns.

As Sandeep observed, at this rate, if it continued for the whole year, 3.5% of POL’s total supply would be burned.

Such a burn rate introduces massive deflationary pressure on POL. Reduced inflation is key for POL’s future growth, as it accelerates upward movement.

Historically, there has been a direct correlation between higher scarcity and higher prices. For example, over the past six months, POL declined significantly when inflation rose, and has recovered in 2026 as inflation fell.

Additionally, 3.6 bln POL is staked, and stakers and validators earn a combined reward of 1.5% of POL. This also further elevates token scarcity.

Therefore, if the model holds for a sustained period, POL could benefit extensively in 2026.

Polygon hits a record 1.4 billion transactions in 2025

In addition to deflationary moves, Polygon usage and adoption have skyrocketed. According to official observation, Polygon reached a record 1.4 billion transactions in 2025, reflecting massive adoption.

In fact, daily transactions stabilized above 5 million, with occasional spikes to 7 million, while transaction volume stayed above 20 million.

Significantly, the growth in transactions was also backed by a growing user base.

Active addresses grew significantly, with weekly addresses stabilizing above 15 million while daily addresses hovered around 1 million and 700k.

Usually, when addresses and transactions rise in tandem, it signals increased network usage. Thus, more users are actively engaged with the network, pointing to actual demand for the asset.

Can POL claim a high 2026?

After trading in a descending channel through Q4 2024, POL kicked off 2026 on a positive note. In fact, the altcoin jumped 21% from $0.09 to $0.127 over the past week.

At press time, POL traded at $0.126, up 4.67% on the daily charts. This bullish outlook has carried over to the monthly charts after price cleared December losses.

As a result, the altcoin’s Stochastic Momentum Index moved from the negative zone to 84 at press time, indicating strong upward momentum.

With Polygon recording a significant adoption rate amid reduced scarcity, the sustainability of deflationary measures could set POL up for a positive run in 2026.

As of now, the altcoin faces significant long-term resistance at $0.17, according to the Future Trend Channel. To reach this level, POL must first target $0.15 in the short term.

However, a break in the current momentum will see the altcoin drop to $0.11, then attempt another leg up.


Final Thoughts

  • Polygon is set for a significant deflationary boost in 2026, with 1 million POL burned daily via generated fees, which could amount to 3.5% of the supply.
  • Polygon network usage recorded a significant milestone in 2025, hitting 1.4 billion transactions.

Related Questions

QWhat is the daily POL token burn rate mentioned by Polygon's CEO, and what percentage of the total supply would be burned if this rate continued for a year?

A1 million POL tokens are burned daily, and if this rate continued for a whole year, it would burn 3.5% of the total supply.

QWhat two key metrics does the article cite as evidence of massive adoption and increased network usage on the Polygon network in 2025?

AThe article cites a record 1.4 billion total transactions in 2025 and daily transactions stabilizing above 5 million, alongside a growing user base with weekly active addresses above 15 million.

QAccording to the article, what is the direct historical correlation between POL's price and its inflation rate?

AHistorically, POL's price declined when inflation rose and recovered when inflation fell.

QWhat is the significant long-term resistance level for POL's price as mentioned in the article, and what is the short-term target it must first reach?

AThe significant long-term resistance level is $0.17, and POL must first target $0.15 in the short term.

QBesides token burns, what other mechanism is contributing to POL token scarcity?

AWith 3.6 billion POL staked, stakers and validators earn a combined reward of 1.5% of POL, which further elevates token scarcity.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit6m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit6m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit22m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit22m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片