PIPPIN down 13%: Smart money selling, long squeeze, and…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-25Last updated on 2026-01-25

Abstract

PIPPIN's price crashed over 13% in 24 hours, extending monthly losses to 36%, significantly underperforming the broader crypto market. On-chain data indicates smart money offloaded over $675K of PIPPIN, contributing to heavy sell pressure. The price broke below an ascending trendline, entering a bearish structure and trading choppily between $0.28 and $0.50. A long squeeze accelerated the decline, while traders are now clustering liquidity bets around the $0.39-$0.42 zone, a potential target for a bounce. However, continued selling pressure and market-wide capital rotation from memecoins to stable assets like BTC and ETH suggest ongoing risks. A breakdown below key support at $0.29 could trigger further declines.

PIPPIN price crashed by more than 13% in the past 24 hours, extending the losses to about 36% this month. The memecoin underperformed the crypto market, which was nearly flat over the past few weeks.

Technically, the memecoin is undergoing a deeper correction, which is evident on the charts and in the chain activity.

Smart money offloading PIPPIN

As per StalkChain data, PIPPIN was the most sold token in the last 24 hours. The smart money offloaded more than $675K Pippin [PIPPIN] during this period.

This withdrawal of capital from the memecoin resulted in the sell pressure that brought the memecoin down.

Other memes in this category were Fartcoin [FARTCOIN], WHITEWHALE, and PENGUIN. Inclusion of USDC in this list meant that traders were locking in profits or cutting their losses.

Again, the correction was market-wide, specifically for memecoins. This is because traders were moving from the high-risk tokens like memes to more stable assets like Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH].

PIPPIN price remains choppy

While the smart money is bearish with their actions, the PIPPIN price has been choppy since reaching a peak around $0.70. The memecoin had broken below the ascending trendline, which indicated the price was trading in a bearish structure.

Even the small pumps that were happening between mid-December and now were insignificant, as the price could not break past this consolidation.

The Choppiness Index (CHOP), which was at 49, showed that the PIPPIN price was bouncing between $0.28 and $0.50. This is after peaking around 60, which meant that the price had no clear direction yet.

Furthermore, the seller’s momentum was contributing to this decline in the price of PIPPIN. The red bars were gradually increasing in size as the price approached the support level around $0.29.

Historical data showed that every time the PIPPIN price hit the aforementioned support level, it was followed by a bounce back. That suggested it could rise to $0.40 as the first target.

Conversely, a breakdown of the level would accelerate the decline, increasing the losses. However, this was not guaranteed, as bets to the upside were hitting the markets.

Liquidity magnet sitting above price action

As per CoinGlass data, traders were now betting on price, activating the orders at the $0.39 level. Positions worth thousands of dollars were clustered between $0.39 and $0.42, price magnets that could pull PIPPIN toward this zone.

The clusters came after the liquidation of long orders sitting below $0.36. The long squeeze accelerated the breakdown on the charts.

That said, choppiness on the charts, smart money’s selling pressure, capital rotation, and a long squeeze all contributed to the price crash.


Final Thoughts

  • PIPPIN price declined by 13%, extending the monthly losses to 36%.
  • PIPPIN could bounce back to $0.39, where liquidity clusters were price magnets.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage decline in PIPPIN's price over the past 24 hours and this month?

APIPPIN's price crashed by more than 13% in the past 24 hours, extending the losses to about 36% this month.

QAccording to StalkChain data, what was the primary action of 'smart money' regarding PIPPIN in the last 24 hours?

AAccording to StalkChain data, PIPPIN was the most sold token in the last 24 hours, with smart money offloading more than $675K worth of it.

QWhat does the Choppiness Index (CHOP) value of 49 indicate about the PIPPIN price action?

AA Choppiness Index (CHOP) value of 49 shows that the PIPPIN price was bouncing between $0.28 and $0.50 with no clear directional trend.

QWhat is the significance of the liquidity clusters between $0.39 and $0.42 for the PIPPIN price?

AThe liquidity clusters between $0.39 and $0.42 are price magnets that could potentially pull the PIPPIN price toward that zone, as traders have placed orders there.

QWhat are the two possible price scenarios mentioned for PIPPIN if it reaches the key support level around $0.29?

AHistorically, the price has bounced back from the $0.29 support level, potentially rising to $0.40. Conversely, a breakdown below this level would accelerate the decline and increase losses.

Related Reads

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit12m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit12m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit49m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit49m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片