Paradigm Builds Its Own Prediction Market Trading Terminal, Also Considering Market Making and Index Products

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-02Last updated on 2026-04-02

Abstract

Paradigm, a major crypto investment firm, is developing a dedicated trading terminal for prediction markets, targeting professional traders and market makers, according to anonymous sources. Led by partner Arjun Balaji since late 2025, the initiative aligns with growing institutional interest in prediction markets, where users speculate on events like elections or asset prices. The company is reportedly considering launching an internal market-making desk and exploring the creation of a prediction market index—similar to traditional indices like the S&P 500—by aggregating multiple prediction markets into a single tradable product. Paradigm has already begun compiling prediction market data into a public dashboard. Notably, Paradigm is a key investor in Kalshi, a leading prediction market platform it helped value at $22 billion, and insists the terminal does not compete with Kalshi’s core business. This move is part of Paradigm’s broader expansion beyond crypto into AI and robotics, evidenced by its ongoing efforts to raise a new $1.5 billion fund. The firm has a history of launching in-house projects, including the crypto software company Ithaca and Tempo, a stablecoin-focused blockchain developed with Stripe.

Author: Fortune (Anonymous Insider)

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Prediction markets are evolving from niche tools to a mainstream financial sector. Paradigm is not content with just being an investor and is starting to build infrastructure itself. Behind this move is a top-tier crypto VC redefining its boundaries by incubating projects—from Ithaca to Tempo to the prediction market terminal, Paradigm is increasingly resembling a product company.

Full Text Below:

One of the most influential investment firms in the crypto space is seeking a larger share of the rapidly growing prediction market pie. According to insiders, venture capital firm Paradigm is developing a prediction market trading terminal for professional traders and market makers. The sources requested anonymity to discuss these non-public business plans. It is reported that Paradigm partner Arjun Balaji has been leading this project since late 2025.

Balaji did not respond to requests for comment, and a Paradigm spokesperson also declined to comment.

The advancement of this trading terminal project coincides with mainstream financial institutions racing to enter the prediction market space. Prediction markets allow traders to speculate on outcomes such as sports events, election trends, and even Bitcoin prices, and have seen growing popularity in recent years.

According to two insiders, Paradigm is also considering whether to establish an internal market-making desk for prediction markets alongside the development of the trading terminal.

Additionally, a third source familiar with Paradigm's situation stated that the venture capital firm is collaborating with researchers to explore the feasibility of creating prediction market indices. The core idea is to bundle multiple prediction markets into a tradable product, similar to how the S&P 500 index consolidates 500 company stocks into one index. Currently, Paradigm has begun aggregating prediction market data into a public dashboard.

Kalshi and Polymarket

Paradigm is a major investor in Kalshi, one of the top two prediction market platforms. In 2025, the venture capital firm participated in three rounds of funding for Kalshi and led the December round that pushed Kalshi's valuation to $11 billion. Currently, Kalshi has completed a new round of funding of at least $1 billion, raising its valuation to $22 billion.

Paradigm co-founder and managing partner Matt Huang serves on Kalshi's board of directors. According to one insider, Paradigm's development of a prediction market trading terminal does not compete with Kalshi's platform business.

Competitor Polymarket is also expanding rapidly. According to The Wall Street Journal, the platform is in talks for a new round of funding with a valuation of approximately $20 billion. Meanwhile, a new venture capital firm focused on prediction markets has been established, backed by the CEOs of both major prediction market platforms.

Paradigm's bet on prediction markets also comes as the company continues to expand its boundaries—from its traditional focus on digital assets to broader technology sectors. According to The Wall Street Journal, Paradigm is raising a new fund of up to $1.5 billion, with investment directions no longer limited to crypto but also including AI and robotics.

Paradigm has a tradition of incubating its own projects. In 2024, Paradigm CTO Georgios Konstantopoulos founded Ithaca, a crypto software development company, and serves as its CEO. Recently, Paradigm also collaborated with fintech giant Stripe to jointly develop Tempo—a high-speed blockchain designed for stablecoins. Managing partner Huang is leading this project. According to one insider, Tempo had about 70 employees by early March.

Related Questions

QWhat is Paradigm reportedly developing according to the article?

AParadigm is reportedly developing a prediction market trading terminal for professional traders and market makers.

QWho is leading the prediction market trading terminal project at Paradigm?

AParadigm partner Arjun Balaji has been leading this project since late 2025.

QBesides the trading terminal, what other prediction market-related products is Paradigm considering?

AParadigm is considering establishing an internal market making desk for prediction markets and is exploring the feasibility of creating a prediction market index.

QWhich major prediction market platform is Paradigm a significant investor in?

AParadigm is a significant investor in Kalshi, having participated in multiple funding rounds, including one that valued the company at $11 billion.

QHow is Paradigm expanding its investment focus beyond its traditional areas?

AParadigm is expanding its investment focus to include not just digital assets but also AI and robotics, as it raises a new fund of up to $1.5 billion.

Related Reads

Goldman Sachs Comments on SanDisk and Western Digital Earnings: Strong Performance, But Market Expectations Too High

Highsmith commented on Sandisk and Western Digital's earnings reports, noting that while both companies delivered strong quarterly results, excessively high market expectations are likely to prevent their stock prices from benefiting. The firm anticipates downward pressure on both stocks following the earnings releases. The core issue, according to Highsmith, is not a deterioration in fundamentals but rather market expectations that have overshot reality. Despite impressive beats on revenue, gross margin, and EPS for the quarter, guidance that simply meets or falls slightly below lofty expectations is being interpreted negatively. For Western Digital, Q2 revenue was largely in line with forecasts, while gross margin and EPS beat estimates. However, its Q3 revenue guidance midpoint matched consensus, and gross margin/EPS guidance was only slightly above. Highsmith views this as "not surprising enough" given pre-earnings optimism, maintaining a Neutral rating and a $650 price target. Sandisk's Q2 results significantly exceeded consensus for revenue and EPS. However, its Q3 guidance disappointed, with revenue and gross margin midpoints below Highsmith's forecasts and consensus. Although the stock has declined ~40% from its June peak, Highsmith believes the below-consensus guidance will lead to further pressure, while maintaining a Buy rating and a $2,200 target due to longer-term potential. Highsmith also warns of a negative spillover effect on Micron Technology's stock due to its similar end-market exposure to Sandisk.

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs Comments on SanDisk and Western Digital Earnings: Strong Performance, But Market Expectations Too High

marsbit1h ago

After the Lending Markets Disappear, What's Left for These Public Chains?

"The Lending Market Vanishes: What Remains for These Blockchains?" Last week, Aave announced the closure of its lending markets on six blockchains where each generated less than $5,000 in quarterly revenue. This move highlights a critical trend: while the DeFi lending sector is growing overall, it is becoming highly concentrated on a few leading chains like Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum. The article analyzes the cascading effects when a major lending protocol like Aave exits a chain. Past examples, such as Harmony Protocol and Fantom (later rebranded as Sonic), demonstrate that losing core lending infrastructure leads to a complete collapse of the credit ecosystem. This is because a functional lending market relies on a costly, interconnected stack of services—including reliable price oracles (often maintained by the largest protocol), deep DEX liquidity for liquidations, and stablecoin issuers willing to support native minting and redemption. Once the primary lending demand disappears, maintaining this infrastructure becomes commercially unviable, triggering an exodus of other service providers. The six chains Aave is leaving (including Soneium, Aptos, zkSync, and Scroll) are in an even weaker position than Harmony or Fantom were. They never developed substantial native lending demand despite significant initial funding. Aave's departure will likely accelerate the withdrawal of oracle providers, market makers, and stablecoin issuers, as their business cases depend on a functioning credit market. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle of centralization, where resources and activity consolidate on the most viable chains. The dilemma mirrors challenges in traditional finance, such as global banks withdrawing correspondent banking services from small countries due to high fixed compliance costs. However, unlike the traditional system where institutions like the World Bank can provide subsidies, there is no such safety net in the decentralized crypto space. The key takeaway is that while launching a new blockchain is cheap, operating a full-featured, sustainable credit infrastructure on it is extremely expensive. Aave has now set a minimum annual revenue threshold of $2 million for new chain deployments, roughly covering these fixed costs. The future for many smaller chains may be a fragmented ecosystem with flawed, unofficial forks of major protocols, or they may be left with nothing at all as DeFi lending continues its aggressive consolidation.

marsbit1h ago

After the Lending Markets Disappear, What's Left for These Public Chains?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片