Opinion: Most Tokenized Assets Are Still Traditional Finance Wrapped On-Chain

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-25Last updated on 2026-05-25

Abstract

**Summary:** A market analysis reveals that the vast majority of tokenized assets remain mere "wrappers" for traditional finance on-chain. Of 593 surveyed assets, 77.6% are "Wrapped" assets where the token exists on-chain but key lifecycle functions (issuance, redemption, custody, access) remain off-chain. Only 11.1% are "Hybrid" assets, where some operational logic (transfers, settlement, yield accrual) is migrating on-chain, representing the true beginning of transformation. A mere 2.7% are "Native" assets built with a fully on-chain operational model. This explains why stablecoins feel structurally advanced compared to other RWA—they are true on-chain financial primitives, not just digitized traditional processes. The key future distinction won't be between tokenized and non-tokenized assets, but between those that are merely distributed on-chain and those that begin to *operate* on-chain.

Author: Yaroslav Writtle

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: The RWA sector has been discussed for so long, yet 77.6% of tokenized assets are still just "on-chain wrapping paper" — the token is on-chain, but issuance, redemption, and custody are entirely off-chain. What's truly worth attention are the 11.1% of "hybrid" assets, which are moving part of their lifecycle on-chain. This explains why stablecoins feel far ahead of other RWAs: they are genuine on-chain financial primitives, not just digital shells for traditional processes.

Market Size Growing Faster Than Market Maturity

An effective way to understand this market is not to look at whether it's tokenized or not.

Instead, look at:

Wrapped
Hybrid
Native

A 2026 market survey covering 593 tokenized assets showed that 460 assets, or 77.6%, were still classified as wrapped. Only 66 assets, or 11.1%, were hybrid, and a mere 16 assets, or 2.7%, had reached a native state.

This is the true shape of the market.

Wrapped Remains the Default Form

Most tokenized assets improve distribution, not infrastructure.

The token exists on-chain.

Most of its lifecycle does not.

Issuance, redemption, custody, transfer permissions, pricing, and investor access still heavily rely on off-chain systems.

So surface growth may be real, but on-chain autonomy remains low.

Hybrid Is Where Real Transformation Begins

Hybrid is the part of the market worth watching.

This is where certain parts of the lifecycle begin migrating on-chain:

Transfer logic
Settlement processes
Yield accrual
Partial compliance or access controls

Not fully native.

But no longer just wrapping paper.

This middle category is still small, which is why the market feels like it's moving faster than it actually is.

Native Is Rare for a Reason

Native assets are rare because the bar is high.

To reach that level, it's not just about the token being on-chain.

The operating model must also be on-chain.

This includes:

Issuance and redemption
Transfer execution
Custody assumptions
Composability with other systems

Very few assets truly meet this standard today.

Stablecoins Still Feel Ahead of Other Assets

This also helps explain why stablecoins still feel structurally ahead of most RWAs.

They are closer to being true on-chain financial primitives.

Many other tokenized assets still resemble digital wrapping paper for traditional processes, rather than assets that genuinely operate within an on-chain financial system.

What Matters Next

The market doesn't need more proof that assets can be tokenized.

A more useful question now is: which parts of the lifecycle have truly migrated along with it?

This is where the next round of differentiation will occur.

Not between tokenized and non-tokenized.

But between assets that are still distributed on-chain, and assets that are beginning to operate on-chain.

The Verdict in Choi Tae-won's Divorce Case: Revealing the Inheritance Undercurrent Behind SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire

SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won's high-profile divorce case, involving a record 1.38 trillion won settlement, has drawn attention to the succession plans for Korea's second-largest conglomerate, especially its crown jewel, SK hynix. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts centered on the eldest son, Chey's three children from his marriage to former President Roh Tae-woo's daughter, Roh Soh-yeong, are carving distinct, non-traditional paths. Eldest daughter Chey Yun-jung (b. 1989) is seen as the most evident successor. With a scientific and consulting background, she holds executive roles at SK bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth support department, focusing on future strategy and biopharma. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional business alliance. Second daughter Chey Min-jung (b. 1991) took a unique route, voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including an anti-piracy deployment. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting her to U.S. defense and policy circles—networks crucial for a global semiconductor giant. The only son, Chey In-geun (b. 1995), who studied physics like his father, worked briefly at SK E&S before joining McKinsey. Despite fitting the traditional "heir" profile as the eldest son, he remains silent and holds no public position or shares in SK, suggesting the old succession playbook is obsolete. As SK hynix's valuation soars, becoming a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the heirs' legitimacy is no longer automatic. They must prove themselves in fields like AI biotech, global policy, and strategic consulting. Their marriages also reflect new elite networks in tech and defense, not old political alliances. Their inheritance is the complex challenge of navigating a globalized, tech-driven world, not just a corporate throne.

marsbit6h ago

The Verdict in Choi Tae-won's Divorce Case: Revealing the Inheritance Undercurrent Behind SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire

marsbit6h ago

Banks oppose stablecoin yield deal – Can CLARITY Act find 60 votes?

The Bank Policy Institute (BPI) has opposed the latest draft of the CLARITY Act, criticizing its provisions on stablecoin yield and illicit finance. The banking industry sought a total ban on stablecoin yield, but the bill's compromise only prohibits passive yield on idle balances. This opposition has influenced lawmakers, reducing tentative Republican Senate support to potentially 49 votes. With the 60-vote threshold needed, securing sufficient Democratic support appears difficult as some pro-crypto Democrats also oppose the bill due to ethics and illicit finance concerns. Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed doubt the bill can pass before the August recess. Market odds for the bill's passage in 2026 have fallen, leaving its future uncertain.

ambcrypto6h ago

Banks oppose stablecoin yield deal – Can CLARITY Act find 60 votes?

ambcrypto6h ago

2 Months, Valuation Soars from $8.8B to $68B! The Largest AI Model Hub OpenRouter May Be Acquired

Stripe is reportedly in talks to acquire AI model marketplace OpenRouter for a price nearing $10 billion, a dramatic increase from its $1.3 billion valuation just two months prior. The deal, which could be announced within a month, would see the payment giant absorb a key "router" or aggregation layer in the AI infrastructure stack. OpenRouter provides developers with a single API to access over 400 large language models (LLMs), automatically routing queries to the most suitable model based on cost, capability, and speed. This allows AI applications to optimize expenses while maintaining user experience. Founded in 2023 by ex-OpenSea co-founder Alex Atallah and Louis Vichy, OpenRouter has grown rapidly, reaching $50 million in annualized revenue by April and serving over one million developers. For Stripe, the acquisition of OpenRouter follows its late-2025 purchase of usage-based billing platform Metronome. The combined strategy aims to create an integrated suite for the AI economy: OpenRouter would handle model selection and routing, Metronome would manage granular usage-based billing, and Stripe's core platform would process payments. This positions Stripe to control a critical part of the AI application value chain, influencing which models get used while simplifying cost management for enterprise customers.

链捕手6h ago

2 Months, Valuation Soars from $8.8B to $68B! The Largest AI Model Hub OpenRouter May Be Acquired

链捕手6h ago

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His 'Exit at the Peak' Playbook?

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His "Exit at the Peak" Playbook? According to the Wall Street Journal, payments giant Stripe is in talks to acquire the AI model aggregation platform OpenRouter in a potential deal valuing the company near $100 billion. This would mark founder Alex Atallah's second creation of a company reaching a $100 billion valuation, following his co-founding of NFT marketplace OpenSea. OpenRouter, founded just over three years ago, has grown rapidly by acting as a unified gateway for developers to access over 400 AI models. It currently has about 10 million users and processes over 200 trillion tokens monthly. While the platform's annualized revenue is around $50 million, its valuation has skyrocketed from $1.3 billion in March 2026. The potential acquisition by Stripe, a company OpenRouter's founder once likened it to, represents a major expansion into AI infrastructure for the payments leader. This move echoes Atallah's previous timing with OpenSea, where he departed before the NFT market's significant downturn. For OpenRouter, selling now may be strategic. Despite its scale, its business model—charging a 5-5.5% fee on AI inference calls—faces pressure from competition, open-source models, and potential price wars among model providers, limiting its profitability narrative for an IPO. A key asset for potential acquirers like Stripe is OpenRouter's vast repository of real-world AI usage data, which offers unique insights into model performance and developer preferences that are difficult to replicate. Whether this potential deal signifies a new valuation benchmark for AI infrastructure or another market peak signal remains to be seen.

链捕手7h ago

Pons V2 brings RWA trading pairs as Robinhood Chain broadens its ambitions

Pons, a key launchpad on Robinhood Chain, has launched its V2 upgrade. The update aims to boost liquidity, remove trading restrictions for most users via an ETH-denominated bonding curve, and introduces support for custom tokenized real-world asset (RWA) trading pairs. This aligns with Robinhood Chain's broader RWA focus. The upgrade also allows creators to collect fees in ETH by default. The network itself is growing rapidly, surpassing $300 million in Total Value Locked. Its cumulative DEX volume has exceeded $9 billion, with about 80% coming from speculative memecoin trading. However, data shows 63% of traders are at a loss, with profits concentrated in a small number of wallets. The introduction of RWAs could help drive more organic adoption for the chain, which is positioning itself as a major player for speculative trading, challenging networks like Base and Solana.

ambcrypto7h ago

Trading

Spot