OpenMind, the Leader in the Robotics Track, is About to TGE: Is the $400 Million Valuation New Token Sale Worth Participating In?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-01-25Last updated on 2026-01-25

Abstract

OpenMind, a leading robotics company, is set to conduct a Token Generation Event (TGE) for its native token ROBO on the Kaito platform. With a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $400 million, the token sale aims to raise $2 million, representing 0.5% of the total token supply. The public sale begins on January 26 at 8 PM Beijing Time, with a per-address investment limit of $1,000 to $250,000 and tokens fully unlocked at TGE. Founded by Stanford professor Jan Liphardt, OpenMind is developing a universal operating system and decentralized network for intelligent machines, enabling global collaboration between robots. It has received backing from major investors like Pantera Capital, Coinbase Ventures, and DCG, and was recognized among the top 100 robotics startups of 2025. Notably, NVIDIA's Robotics division has shared OpenMind's content, indicating close ties. The project operates alongside the Fabric Foundation, an independent entity managing the protocol’s governance and ecosystem. The ROBO token sale includes a 40% priority allocation for partner communities, with the remaining 60% open to the general public. However, the $400 million FDV is considered high compared to similar AI and robotics projects like Virtuals ($540M), Sentient ($200M), and Grass ($127M). Concerns include unclear tokenomics and potential sell pressure from early investors if institutional tokens are unlocked at TGE, making the offering less attractive despite strong backing.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Asher (@Asher_ 0210)

On January 23, the official Foundation account of OpenMind, the leader in the robotics track, Fabric Foundation, posted on platform X that its native token ROBO will soon undergo a token sale on the Kaito platform.

Below, Odaily Planet Daily will take you through understanding the robotics track leader OpenMind, its relationship with the Fabric Foundation, and the details of the new token sale.

OpenMind: Building a Universal Operating System for Intelligent Machines and a Decentralized Collaboration Network

OpenMind was founded by Stanford University Professor Jan Liphardt. It is dedicated to building a universal operating system for intelligent machines and a decentralized collaboration network, enabling robots from different manufacturers and of different forms to securely trust each other, share information, and collaborate on a global scale. Furthermore, OpenMind was successfully selected as one of the Top 100 Global Robotics Startups in 2025.

It is worth mentioning that NVIDIA Robotics' official account reposted a robot testing video from OpenMind, and the two parties have close business dealings.

NVIDIA Robotics official account reposts OpenMind's tweet

In early August this year, OpenMind announced the completion of a $20 million funding round, led by Pantera Capital, with participation from Ribbit, Sequoia, Coinbase Ventures, DCG, Lightspeed Faction, Anagram, Pi Network Ventures, Topology, Primitive Ventures, Amber Group, and several other institutions and renowned angel investors.

The Relationship Between OpenMind and Fabric

OpenMind is the founding team and core developer of the Fabric protocol, and also a core contributor and initiator of the Fabric Foundation. Fabric was initially designed and developed by the OpenMind team, responsible for the core technical architecture and early implementation of the protocol.

As the project developed, to prevent the protocol from being controlled by a single company and to achieve a more open and neutral governance structure, OpenMind spun off the governance, economic model, and community coordination functions of Fabric to establish an independent non-profit organization, the Fabric Foundation. This foundation is responsible for the long-term maintenance, standard setting, ecosystem incentives, and global coordination of the protocol, promoting the sustainable development of Fabric.

Currently, OpenMind continues to participate in the construction of the Fabric protocol as a core contributor. Its official introduction also clearly states "We’re a core contributor of @FabricFND". Meanwhile, the community branding has been unified towards Fabric, including the renaming of Discord and the unified narrative of the protocol and the ROBO token, further strengthening Fabric's position as the main brand.

OpenMind's official Discord renamed to Fabric

Fabric New Token Sale Details

According to official information, the native token of the Fabric protocol, ROBO, will undergo a token sale on the Kaito platform. The specific details for participation are as follows:

  • Sale Start Time: January 26th, 8:00 PM Beijing Time;
  • Valuation: $400 million FDV;
  • Fundraising Target: $2 million;
  • Sale Proportion: 0.5% of the total supply of ROBO tokens;
  • Unlock Situation: 100% unlocked at TGE;
  • Single Address Subscription Limit: Minimum $1,000, Maximum $250,000;
  • Expected TGE Time: Q1 2026 (specific date not announced).

Additionally, 40% of the total public sale allocation on the Kaito platform is Priority Allocation, dedicated to partner communities:

  • Fabric Foundation community (based on past participation, holders of Platinum/Emerald/Diamond tier, OG, Developer, Backpack, Researcher badges, etc.): 15%;
  • Kaito AI community (sKAITO holders, etc.): 10%;
  • Virtuals community (holders of >100 veVIRTUAL): 5%;
  • Surf AI community (Pro/Max annual subscribers or NFT Pass holders): 5%;
  • Other Kaito referral programs: 5%.

The remaining 60% of the new token sale allocation is the public portion (for general eligible users).

The $400 Million Valuation for the New Sale Offers Less Than Ideal Value

From a valuation comparison perspective, OpenMind's token ROBO is priced at a $400 million FDV, significantly higher than the reasonable range for comparable projects in the same track that have already issued tokens. For reference, among related projects in the AI robotics sector, Virtuals currently has a market cap of approximately $540 million, Sentient around $200 million, and Grass around $127 million. ROBO's starting valuation is already on the high side.

Although OpenMind has backing from top-tier investment firms like Pantera Capital, Coinbase Ventures, and DCG, providing some endorsement for the project, the detailed token economics for ROBO have not yet been released. Particularly, the unlock ratio for institutional investors at TGE remains unclear.

If institutions have liquid supply at TGE, combined with the 100% unlock of the public sale portion, it could create significant dual selling pressure, putting pressure on the early price trend. Given this uncertainty, the pricing of the new sale at a $400 million FDV offers less than ideal overall value.

Related Questions

QWhat is OpenMind and what does it aim to build?

AOpenMind is a leader in the robotics sector, founded by Stanford Professor Jan Liphardt. It aims to build a universal operating system and a decentralized collaboration network for intelligent machines, enabling robots from different manufacturers to securely share information and work together globally.

QWhat is the relationship between OpenMind and the Fabric Foundation?

AOpenMind is the founding team and core developer of the Fabric protocol. To avoid centralized control and promote open governance, OpenMind spun off the protocol's governance and economic model to form the independent, non-profit Fabric Foundation. OpenMind remains a core contributor to the ongoing development of the Fabric protocol.

QWhat are the key details of the ROBO token sale on the Kaito platform?

AThe ROBO token sale on Kaito has a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $400 million. It aims to raise $2 million, representing 0.5% of the total token supply. The sale begins on January 26th at 8 PM Beijing Time. Tokens are 100% unlocked at TGE, with a per-address purchase limit of $1,000 to $250,000. The TGE is expected in Q1 2026.

QWhy does the article suggest the $400 million FDV valuation offers suboptimal value for participants?

AThe article suggests the $400 million FDV is suboptimal because it is significantly higher than the current market capitalizations of comparable projects in the AI and robotics sector, such as Virtuals ($540M), Sentient (~$200M), and Grass (~$127M). Furthermore, the lack of transparency regarding the tokenomics and the potential for early selling pressure from both the publicly sold tokens (100% unlocked) and possibly institutional investors could negatively impact the token's early price action.

QWhich major investors participated in OpenMind's funding round?

AOpenMind raised $20 million in a funding round led by Pantera Capital. Other participants included Ribbit, Sequoia Capital, Coinbase Ventures, DCG, Lightspeed Faction, Anagram, Pi Network Ventures, Topology, Primitive Ventures, and Amber Group.

Related Reads

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News4m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News4m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit21m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit21m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手32m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手32m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit47m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit47m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片