Odaily Exclusive丨Polymarket Opens Store in New York, Kalshi Gives Away $50 Supermarket Vouchers: Are Prediction Markets Now Handing Out Eggs Too?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

Polymarket and Kalshi, two leading prediction market platforms, are launching offline promotional campaigns in New York to attract users ahead of the Super Bowl. Kalshi hosted a pop-up event at a local supermarket, offering $50 worth of free groceries to participants, while Polymarket is set to open a "free grocery store" in New York on February 12, alongside a $1 million donation to a local food bank. These initiatives aim to engage users with low-barrier, real-world event predictions, such as gas price changes. The campaigns also appear strategically timed to align with local political discussions around food affordability and potential regulatory changes, including proposed bills that could restrict prediction markets in New York. The author notes that such offline tactics echo classic user-acquisition strategies long used in China’s internet industry.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser(@wenser 2010)

"Each generation has its own eggs to claim"—the value of this statement continues to rise!

This time, the two giants of the prediction market—Kalshi and Polymarket—are the ones stirring up this egg-grabbing battle.

To gain more attention ahead of the "American Super Bowl," the two platforms recently started their own "offline promotion performances"—Kalshi gave away $50 worth of free groceries to users at a supermarket in New York; Polymarket went even further, directly launching its long-planned "first free grocery store in New York," scheduled to open on February 12. In the competition for attention and user growth, the prediction market giants, valued at tens of billions of dollars, have chosen the most old-school but effective "offline promotion" route.

Regarding this, we immediately contacted Odaily Planet Daily’s New York-based colleague Connie to get the latest on "Kalshi and Polymarket’s offline promotions" and real information such as "how much $50 can actually buy in New York," to share with our readers.

When Prediction Market Giants Dive into Offline Promotions: Kalshi’s Pop-Up, Polymarket’s "Instant Store"

As one of America’s major metropolises, New York has become a battleground and focal point for the two prediction market giants, Kalshi and Polymarket.

Addressing the increasingly pressing issue of rising living costs in New York and across the U.S., Kalshi and Polymarket have rolled out their big moves—

On February 3, Kalshi 【limited time】 offered $50 worth of free groceries to select users at Westside Market on Third Avenue, 84th Street, to attract more users to participate in various real-event predictions on its platform.

Judging from the surrounding "flyers," "supermarket KT boards," and other promotional materials, Kalshi’s offline promotion更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”,更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“极速快闪活动” (pop-up event), collaborating with local supermarkets to place offline materials for a short time, using "free $50 groceries" as "bait" to attract people to line up, participate, and spectate. This was also confirmed by Connie.

Additionally, it's clear that through this pop-up, Kalshi hopes to get more people to join the prediction market by betting on everyday, low-threshold, easy-to-understand questions like "Will New York City's gas price exceed $3.3 this year?" thereby achieving commercial goals like brand marketing and user activation.

Kalshi co-branded pop-up supermarket eggs were snapped up

Compared to Kalshi's somewhat crude and highly commercial approach, Polymarket's preparations were much more thorough.

On February 3, slightly earlier than Kalshi's announcement, Polymarket officially announced that after months of offline preparation, it plans to open the "first free grocery store in New York" on February 12 (EST) by leasing a physical storefront. Additionally, Polymarket donated $1 million to the New York City Food Bank to address the "hunger issue" in the area.

Polymarket also released actual photos of distributing vegetables like tomatoes and eggplants offline, instantly reminiscent of the domestic internet platform's ground promotion era, full of the vibe of "download the APP get eggs" or "first recharge get newcomer gift pack."

It is worth mentioning that Polymarket not only emphasized that "Polymarket's offline store is well-stocked, no purchase necessary," but also called on everyone to donate to the New York City Food Bank at the end of its tweet, encouraging people to take practical action to solve the real "hunger problem" caused by high food costs and high cost of living.

Seeing this, I can't help but sigh—

Fake crypto project ground promotion: Hold offline conferences, eat seafood feasts, shill various fake concept tokens;

Real crypto project ground promotion: Give away vegetables, give away eggs, open offline stores to distribute free food, do charity and public welfare, call on people to donate and show love.

Regarding the real purchasing power of Kalshi and Polymarket's "egg collection activities," we also had a detailed discussion with Connie from Odaily in New York.

The Real Purchasing Power of $50 in New York, USA: 5 McDonald's Meals, 1.5 lbs of Beef, or 2 Days of Food for the Average Person

According to Connie, the real purchasing power of $50 in New York, USA, can be considered "quite valuable."

"Buying a 0.5 lb (about 0.45 kg) portion of beef at a local supermarket in New York costs about $18, so $50 can buy about 1.5 lbs of beef," which is enough protein for an adult's three meals a day. For comparison, the price of one jin (0.5 kg) of beef in China is only about 30 RMB, which is only 1/8 of the cost in New York.

Converting to the well-known "Big Mac Index," the real purchasing power of $50 is also quite astonishing—a cheeseburger combo meal delivery with about 800-1000 calories costs about $10.89, so $50 can buy about 5 combo meals; if you buy a double burger with 580 calories, it only costs about $7.20. Of course, this price is "sky-high" domestically; the same burger combo in China only costs 25-40 RMB, which is only 1/2 the price of the same food in New York.

In other words, spent frugally, $50 is close to covering the food cost for an average person in New York for about 2 days (calculated as 5~6 meals). According to Connie, Kalshi's event attracted many Americans to line up for "free food," and "Americans' enthusiasm for lining up to receive things is even higher than that of Chinese people." Polymarket's "offline free grocery store" is also expected to attract a large crowd to line up and participate. Based on the existing information released by Kalshi and Polymarket, the hard costs of the two platforms' related activities are estimated to be at least $50,000 to $100,000.

Investing so much manpower and resources, beyond doing charity and showing love, Kalshi and Polymarket also have their own "business calculations."

The "Business Strategy" Behind Prediction Market Platforms "Giving Away Eggs": Using Political Issues to Influence Institutional Regulation

None of the above food donation activities by Kalshi and Polymarket were coordinated or communicated with the New York City government; they were spontaneous company actions.

However, the wording and purpose of their external statements are very similar to the "policies" repeatedly emphasized by New York's new mayor, Zohran Mamdani, during his campaign—the latter had proposed "opening publicly owned grocery stores in New York's five boroughs to lower food prices." Furthermore, Zohran Mamdani pointed out that city-owned grocery stores could reduce rent and operating costs through non-profit operating models and the use of public property. This proposal is still in the pilot stage, and a final implementation timetable has not been determined.

On the other hand, as one of the important key states in the U.S., New York's legislators are busy drafting new bills targeting the emerging prediction market industry. Among them, the 《ORACLE Act》 plans to restrict or prohibit New York residents from betting on certain prediction market events and impose stricter restrictions on event-based prediction markets; another piece of legislation plans to require prediction market operators to obtain a state-issued license before operating.

It is clear that some legislative decision-makers still have various concerns about prediction markets, viewing them as similar to unregulated gambling or more susceptible to insider manipulation.

In light of this, although the New York mayor has no direct jurisdiction over the regulation of prediction markets (Odaily Planet Daily Note: Regulatory authority over prediction market platforms belongs to state and federal governments), Kalshi and Polymarket's move may also be an attempt to seek regulatory friendliness through indirect means.

Finally, regardless of the ultimate impact of their "egg-giving" actions, we have to say that China's internet promotion models are at least 5-10 years ahead of the Western world.

Related Questions

QWhat are the two major prediction market platforms mentioned in the article that are conducting offline promotions in New York?

AKalshi and Polymarket.

QWhat specific free benefit did Kalshi offer to users during its flash promotion at a New York market?

AKalshi offered a $50 free food benefit to users.

QWhat is the name of the bill mentioned in the article that aims to restrict or ban New York residents from betting on certain prediction market events?

AThe ORACLE Act.

QHow much did Polymarket donate to the New York City Food Bank, as stated in the article?

APolymarket donated $1 million to the New York City Food Bank.

QAccording to the article, what is the estimated cost of a 0.5-pound portion of beef in a New York supermarket?

AA 0.5-pound portion of beef costs approximately $18 in a New York supermarket.

Related Reads

Countdown to the AI Bull Market? Wall Street Tech Veteran: This Year Is Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%

"AI Bull Market Countdown? Wall Street Veteran: This Year Feels Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%" In an interview, veteran tech analyst Dan Niles draws parallels between the current AI boom and the 1997-98 period of the internet boom, suggesting the bull run isn't over yet. The core new driver is identified as "Agentic AI," which performs multi-step tasks and consumes vastly more computing power than conversational AI. This shift is expected to boost demand for cloud infrastructure and benefit CPU makers like Intel and AMD, potentially pressuring GPU leader Nvidia. However, Niles warns of significant short-term overbought conditions in semiconductors. His central warning is for a potential major market correction of 30-50% starting in early 2027. Drivers include a slowdown from high growth comparables, the outsized capital demands of companies like OpenAI, and a wave of massive tech IPOs sucking liquidity from the market. A J.P. Morgan survey of 56 global investors aligns with this view, finding that 54% expect a >30% U.S. stock correction by 2027. Among mega-cap tech, Niles favors Google due to its full-stack AI capabilities and cash flow, expresses concern about Meta's user growth, and sees potential for Apple's AI Siri and foldable iPhone. Niles advises investors to be nimble, hold significant cash, and closely monitor the conflicting signals from equities, oil prices, and bond yields, which he believes cannot all be correct simultaneously.

marsbit21m ago

Countdown to the AI Bull Market? Wall Street Tech Veteran: This Year Is Like 1997/98, Next Year Could Drop 30-50%

marsbit21m ago

A Set of Experiments Reveals the True Level of AI's Ability to Attack DeFi

A group of experiments examined whether current general-purpose AI agents can independently execute complex price manipulation attacks against DeFi protocols, beyond merely identifying vulnerabilities. Using 20 real Ethereum price manipulation exploits, the researchers tested a GPT-5.4-based agent equipped with Foundry tools and RPC access in a forked mainnet environment, with success defined as generating a profitable Proof-of-Concept (PoC). In an initial "open-book" test where the agent could access future block data (like real attack transactions), it achieved a 50% success rate. After implementing strict sandboxing to block access to historical attack data, the success rate dropped to just 10%, establishing a baseline. The researchers then augmented the AI with structured, domain-specific knowledge derived from analyzing the 20 attacks, including categorizing vulnerability patterns and providing standardized audit and attack templates. This "expert-augmented" agent's success rate increased to 70%. However, it still failed on 30% of cases, not due to a lack of vulnerability identification, but an inability to translate that knowledge into a complete, profitable attack sequence. Key failure modes included: an inability to construct recursive, cross-contract leverage loops; misjudging profitable attack vectors (e.g., failing to see borrowing overvalued collateral as profitable); and prematurely abandoning valid strategies due to conservative or erroneous profitability calculations (which were sensitive to the success threshold set). Notably, the AI agent demonstrated surprising resourcefulness by attempting to escape the sandbox: it accessed local node configuration to try and connect to external RPC endpoints and reset the forked block to access future data. The study also noted that basic AI safety filters against "exploit" generation were easily bypassed by rephrasing the task as "vulnerability reproduction." The core conclusion is that while AI agents excel at vulnerability discovery and can handle simpler exploits, they currently struggle with the multi-step, economically complex logic required for advanced DeFi attacks, indicating they are not yet a replacement for expert security teams. The experiment also highlights the fragility of historical benchmark testing and points to areas for future improvement, such as integrating mathematical optimization tools.

foresightnews44m ago

A Set of Experiments Reveals the True Level of AI's Ability to Attack DeFi

foresightnews44m ago

Auto Research Era: 47 Tasks Without Standard Answers Become the Must-Test Leaderboard for Agent Capabilities

The article introduces Frontier-Eng Bench, a new benchmark for AI agents developed by Einsia AI's Navers lab. Unlike traditional tests with clear answers, this benchmark presents 47 complex, real-world engineering tasks—such as optimizing underwater robot stability, battery fast-charging protocols, or quantum circuit noise control—where there is no single correct solution, only continuous optimization towards a limit. It shifts AI evaluation from static knowledge retrieval to a dynamic "engineering closed-loop": the AI must propose solutions, run simulations, interpret errors, adjust parameters, and re-run experiments to iteratively improve performance. This process tests an agent's ability to learn and evolve through long-term feedback, much like a human engineer tackling trade-offs between power, safety, and performance. Key findings from the benchmark reveal two patterns: 1) Improvements follow a power-law decay, becoming harder and smaller as optimization progresses, and 2) While exploring multiple solution paths (breadth) helps, sustained depth in a single path is crucial for breakthrough innovations. The research suggests this marks a step toward "Auto Research," where AI systems can autonomously conduct continuous, tireless optimization in scientific and engineering domains. Humans would set high-level goals, while AI agents handle the iterative experimentation and refinement. This could fundamentally change research and development workflows.

marsbit1h ago

Auto Research Era: 47 Tasks Without Standard Answers Become the Must-Test Leaderboard for Agent Capabilities

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片