New revenue hierarchy? How Hyperliquid is outpacing legacy chains

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-06Last updated on 2026-04-06

Abstract

The blockchain value capture model is shifting from passive transfers to active trading, with perpetual trading volume ($8.4B) far exceeding spot DEX activity ($3.7B). Hyperliquid exemplifies this trend, capturing 36.4% of DeFi fees by March 2026, while Ethereum and Solana see declining shares. Its derivatives platform generated $154.95B in total volume from 212,843 traders, driving $12.43M in fees. A key mechanism redirects fees—$403,475 in 24 hours—to buybacks, removing 10,794 HYPE tokens from circulation. This creates a feedback loop where trading activity fuels fees, buy pressure, and token value appreciation, highlighting how specialized trading platforms now dominate value capture over general-purpose chains.

The way blockchains capture value is shifting, as activity moves from passive transfers toward active trading flows. Earlier models relied on broad usage, where simple transactions supported network value.

Now, trading dominates the landscape.

Perpetual volume hovered around about $8.4 billion in 24 hours, far exceeding the $3.7 billion seen across Spot DEX activity. This shows capital now concentrates around continuous trading rather than one-time transfers.

Fee distribution follows this shift, with Hyperliquid contributing about $618,377 out of $41.45million total DeFi fees. This evolution reshapes the market, where value depends more on trading intensity, which favors specialized platforms over general-purpose networks.

Hyperliquid dominance signals a new revenue hierarchy

A clear shift is unfolding in how blockchains earn, and it starts with where user activity is actually happening.

Hyperliquid’s share rose steadily through 2025, reaching about 36.4% by March 2026, which shows traders are concentrating on derivatives platforms.

Source: Blockworks Research

This shift builds as perpetual trading creates continuous fee flow rather than one-off transactions. Capital prefers environments where it can rotate quickly, which naturally pushes revenue toward trading-focused chains.

Solana [SOL] holds near 16%, slipping from 18%, which suggests usage remains strong but loses share as competition intensifies. Meanwhile, Ethereum [ETH] drops toward 7.7%, and Base near 2.4%, showing that broad activity does not translate into fee capture.

This changes market dynamics, where value follows trading intensity, pushing users and liquidity toward platforms that monetize activity more efficiently.

Hyperliquid turns trading activity into direct value capture

HIP-3’s growth shows how quickly derivatives activity can scale when real trading demand enters the system. Total volume reaches about $154.95 billion, supported by 212,843 traders executing roughly 59.36 million trades.

Source: X

This progression builds gradually, then accelerates into sharp spikes from January, where daily volumes expand and cumulative growth trends higher.

As participation increases, fees rise to about $12.43 million, confirming steady monetization alongside activity.

That activity does not remain abstract, as it feeds directly into token dynamics. Over the last 24 hours, fees reached about $403,475, all redirected into buybacks that remove roughly 10,794 HYPE from circulation.

Source: X

This creates a continuous loop, where trading drives fees, fees drive buy pressure, and reduced supply begins to support value as activity deepens.


Final Summary

  • Hyperliquid [HYPE] shows how trading-driven activity now dominates value capture, as continuous derivatives flow converts volume directly into fees and supply reduction.
  • Hyperliquid strengthens its market position as revenue concentration shifts toward specialized platforms, where sustained trading activity supports both liquidity and token value.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main shift in how blockchains capture value according to the article?

AThe main shift is from passive transfers toward active trading flows, with perpetual trading now dominating and creating continuous fee generation rather than one-off transactions.

QHow much of the total DeFi fees did Hyperliquid contribute, as mentioned in the article?

AHyperliquid contributed about $618,377 out of a total of $41.45 million in DeFi fees.

QWhat percentage of the market share did Hyperliquid reach by March 2026?

AHyperliquid reached about 36.4% of the market share by March 2026.

QHow does Hyperliquid's fee mechanism directly impact its token (HYPE)?

AFees generated from trading activity are used for buybacks, which remove HYPE tokens from circulation, creating buy pressure and supporting token value through supply reduction.

QWhat does the comparison between perpetual volume and Spot DEX activity indicate about capital concentration?

APerpetual volume of $8.4 billion far exceeded Spot DEX activity of $3.7 billion in 24 hours, showing capital now concentrates around continuous trading rather than one-time transfers.

Related Reads

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit9m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit9m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片