Micron Invests $24 Billion in Singapore Factory, But Your RAM Sticks Are Not in the Plan

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-27Last updated on 2026-01-27

Abstract

Micron announces a $24 billion investment to build an advanced NAND wafer fabrication plant in Singapore, with production starting in late 2028. This follows a previous $7 billion investment in a high-bandwidth memory (HBM) advanced packaging facility at the same site, bringing total new investments in Singapore to over $30 billion. The move comes as Micron shifts its focus toward AI-driven demand and away from consumer products, having recently discontinued its Crucial consumer brand, which sold retail memory modules and SSDs. The strategic pivot is driven by surging demand from AI and data centers. Micron’s HBM revenue reached $1.98 billion in Q3 FY2025, with full-year 2026 HBM supply already sold out. The company predicts the HBM market will grow to around $100 billion by 2028, surpassing the entire DRAM market of 2024. In contrast, consumer memory market is lower-margin and highly competitive. This supply shift has contributed to significant price increases in consumer memory products, with DDR4 and DDR5 spot prices rising over 150% and 300% respectively in 2025. Although Samsung and SK Hynix have extended DDR4 production in response to soaring prices, overall supply remains tight. As AI continues to drive memory demand, consumer memory costs are expected to stay elevated.

Author: David, Shenchao TechFlow

At this time last year, a 16GB DDR4 RAM stick cost just over 200 RMB. Now, the same model is priced at 600 RMB, with some models even approaching 700 RMB.

The direct reason for the price increase is a tightening of supply. The three major memory giants have collectively shifted their production capacity towards the AI market. And Micron is the latest to lay its cards on the table.

On January 27, Micron Technology announced a $24 billion (approximately S$31 billion) investment to build an advanced NAND (flash memory) wafer fabrication plant in Singapore. The investment will be phased over 10 years, with shipments starting in the second half of 2028. Singapore's Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong attended the groundbreaking ceremony.

This is Micron's second major investment in Singapore.

In January 2025, Micron had already begun construction on a $7 billion HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) advanced packaging facility within the same campus, scheduled for production in 2027. Combined, these two projects represent over $30 billion in new investments by Micron in Singapore.

Image source: Lianhe Zaobao, photo by Tang Jiahong

Yet, this is the same company that just two months ago announced the shutdown of its 29-year-old Crucial consumer brand—the memory sticks and solid-state drives you can buy on JD.com and Taobao.

On one hand, spending billions to build factories; on the other, cutting the consumer business. Both point to the same clue: the demand for memory from AI remains high.

Capacity Reallocation After China Market Contraction

Micron's increased investment in Singapore has a clear geopolitical background.

In May 2023, China's Cyberspace Administration announced that Micron's products had not passed the cybersecurity review and required domestic critical information infrastructure operators to stop procurement. In 2018, the Chinese mainland market contributed 58% of Micron's revenue (approximately $17.36 billion); by fiscal year 2022, this had fallen to 10.8% (approximately $3.31 billion).

Production capacity needs a new outlet.

Currently, Micron already has three 3D NAND fabrication plants and several packaging and testing facilities in Singapore, employing about 9,000 people and producing 98% of Micron's flash memory chips.

Micron stated in its latest announcement that the HBM factory is expected to make a significant contribution to supply by 2027 and mentioned that as HBM becomes part of the Singapore manufacturing operations, "synergistic effects" in both NAND and DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory, the common memory chips) production are anticipated.

But the priority of this "synergy" is clear: HBM capacity for 2026 is completely sold out, data center customer demand cannot be fully met, and the consumer brand is being shut down simultaneously.

Within the same campus, consumer-grade production lines are making way for AI production lines.

The Business Logic of Exiting the Consumer Market

On December 3, 2025, Micron announced via its official website a complete exit from the Crucial consumer business, including the sales of RAM sticks and SSD (Solid State Drive) products through global retailers, e-commerce platforms, and distributors.

Shipments will continue until the end of February 2026, at which point this brand, founded in 1996, will bid farewell to the retail market.

In the statement, Micron's Executive Vice President, Sadana, stated that the surge in memory and storage demand driven by AI in data centers prompted Micron to make the "difficult decision" to exit the Crucial consumer business in order to more effectively supply and support large strategic customers in high-growth areas.

Data supports this judgment.

Micron's fiscal year 2025 third-quarter HBM product income reached $1.98 billion, with an annualized revenue close to $8 billion. According to TrendForce data, the unit price of HBM memory required for AI servers is about 8 times that of ordinary servers.

Micron predicts the HBM market size will grow from approximately $35 billion in 2025 to about $100 billion in 2028, by which time it will exceed the size of the entire DRAM market in 2024.

In contrast, consumer-grade storage is a business with thin profits and fierce competition.

Micron's exit means the world's major consumer DRAM manufacturers are reduced from three—Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron—to two.

The AI Rally of Memory Stocks

The capital market has already priced in this shift.

According to statistics from *National Business Daily*, memory stocks occupied the top four spots on the U.S. stock gainers list for the full year 2025:

SanDisk rose 577%, becoming the S&P 500's top performer for the year; Western Digital rose 281%; Micron rose 236%; Seagate rose 216%.

For comparison, Nvidia rose 39% in the same period, ranking 71st.

It was reported that tech giants like Google and Amazon presented Micron with "unlimited purchase demands" in October 2025. Micron CEO Mehrotra revealed on an earnings call that the company's entire HBM supply for 2026 is already sold out, and currently, it can only meet half to two-thirds of the demand from key customers.

Micron's latest financial report shows revenue of $13.6 billion for September-November 2025, a year-on-year increase of 57%, with DRAM revenue of $10.8 billion, up 69% year-on-year.

Consumer Side: Price Hikes May Continue

Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron had all previously announced plans to gradually phase out DDR4 production from late 2025 to early 2026. Micron issued an end-of-life notice for DDR4/LPDDR4 in June.

Although Samsung and SK Hynix later extended their DDR4 production plans to the end of 2026 due to soaring DDR4 prices, the overall trend of tightening supply remains unchanged.

The price reaction has been intense. According to TrendForce data, since 2025, the spot price of DDR5 memory chips has risen over 300%, while DDR4 has risen over 150%. DDR4 has even seen a "price inversion," with the price of some specifications exceeding that of DDR5.

ADATA Chairman Chen Libai also publicly stated that the comprehensive shortage and price increase across the four major storage categories—DRAM, NAND, SSD, HDD—is a situation he is witnessing for the first time in over thirty years in the industry.

If you want to add memory to your old computer or build a new desktop, the cost remains high. Because AI needs computing power, and computing power needs memory. Your old computer is probably still behind AI demand in the queue.

Memory stocks have risen, and memory stick prices have risen too.

One is an investment opportunity; the other is paying the bill for that opportunity.

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy Chinese Chips; Avoid Traditional Segments. The core theme is the shift in AI compute supply from NVIDIA dominance to a three-track system of GPU + ASIC + China-local chips. The key opportunity is capturing share in this expansion, while non-AI semiconductors face marginalization due to resource reallocation to AI. Key investment conclusions, in order of priority: 1. **Advanced Packaging (CoWoS/SoIC) - Highest Conviction**: TSMC is the primary beneficiary of explosive demand, driven by massive cloud capex. Its pricing power and AI revenue share are rising significantly. 2. **Test Equipment - Undervalued & High-Growth Certainty**: Chip complexity is causing test times to double generationally, structurally driving handler/socket/probe card demand. Companies like Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn), WinWay, and MPI offer compelling value. 3. **China AI Chips (GPU/ASIC) - Long-Term Irreversible Trend**: Export controls are accelerating domestic substitution. Companies like Cambricon, with firm customer orders and SMIC's 7nm capacity support, are positioned to benefit from lower TCO (30-60% vs NVIDIA) and growing local cloud demand. 4. **Avoid Non-AI Semiconductors (Consumer/Auto/Industrial)**: These segments face a weak, structurally hindered recovery due to AI's resource "crowding-out" effect on capacity and supply chains. 5. **Memory - Severe Internal Divergence**: Strongly favor HBM (Hynix primary beneficiary) and NOR Flash (Macronix). Be cautious on interpreting price rises in DDR4/NAND as true demand recovery. The report emphasizes a 2026-2027 time window, stating the AI capital expenditure cycle is far from over. Key macro variables include persistent export controls and AI's systemic "crowding-out" effect on traditional semiconductor supply chains.

marsbit2m ago

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

marsbit2m ago

Circle：Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, reported its Q1 2026 earnings on May 11th, Eastern Time. Against a backdrop of weak crypto market sentiment, USDC's average circulation in Q1 was $752 billion, with a modest 2% sequential increase to $770 billion by quarter-end. New minting volumes declined due to the poor crypto market, but remained high, indicating demand expansion beyond crypto trading. USDC's market share remained stable at 28% of the total stablecoin market, while competition from Tether's USDT persists. A key highlight was "Other Revenue," which reached $42 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though sequential growth slowed to 13%. This revenue stream, including fees from services like Web3 software, the Cipher payment network (CPN), and the Arc blockchain, is critical for diversifying away from interest income. Circle's internally held USDC share increased to 18%, helping to improve gross margin by 130 basis points to 41.4% by reducing external sharing costs. However, profitability was pressured as total revenue growth slowed, primarily due to the significant weight of interest income, which is tied to USDC规模 and Treasury rates. Adjusted EBITDA was $133 million with a 19.2% margin. Management maintained its full-year 2026 guidance for adjusted operating expenses ($570-$585 million) and other revenue ($150-$170 million). The long-term target for USDC's CAGR remains 40%, though near-term volatility is expected. The article concludes that while Circle's current valuation of $28 billion appears reasonable after a recent recovery, further upside depends on the pace of stable币 adoption and potential positive sentiment from the advancement of regulatory clarity acts like CLARITY.

链捕手7m ago

Circle：Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

链捕手7m ago

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

The narrative of tech stocks is increasingly relying on Anthropic. Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, has become central to the financial stories of major tech giants. Elon Musk dissolved xAI, merging it into SpaceX as SpaceXAI, and secured an exclusive deal to rent the massive "Colossus 1" supercomputing cluster to Anthropic. In return, Anthropic expressed interest in future space-based compute collaborations. Google and Amazon are also deeply invested. Google plans to invest up to $40 billion and provide significant compute power, while Amazon holds a 15-16% stake. Both companies reported massive quarterly profit surges largely due to valuation gains from their Anthropic holdings. Crucially, Anthropic has committed to multi-billion dollar cloud compute contracts with both Google Cloud and AWS. This creates a clear divide: the "A Camp" (Anthropic-Google-Musk) versus the "O Camp" (OpenAI-Microsoft). The A Camp's strategy intertwines equity, compute orders, and profits, making Anthropic a "systemic financial node." Its performance directly impacts its partners' financials and stock prices. In contrast, OpenAI, while leading in user traffic, faces commercialization challenges, lower per-user revenue, and a recently restructured relationship with Microsoft. The AI industry is shifting from a race for raw compute (symbolized by Nvidia) to a focus on monetizable applications, where Anthropic currently excels. However, this concentration of market hope on one company amplifies systemic risk. The rise of powerful open-source models like DeepSeek-V4 poses a significant threat, as they could undermine the value proposition of closed-source models like Claude. The article suggests ongoing geopolitical efforts to suppress such competitors will be a long-term strategic focus for Anthropic's allies.

marsbit19m ago

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

marsbit19m ago

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

Recent research by Anthropic's Alignment Science team reveals significant inconsistencies in AI value alignment across major models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and xAI. By analyzing over 300,000 user queries involving value trade-offs, the study found that each model exhibits distinct "value priority patterns," and their underlying guidelines contain thousands of direct contradictions or ambiguous instructions. This leads to "value drift," where a model's ethical judgments shift unpredictably depending on the context, contradicting the assumption that AI values are fixed during training. The core issue lies in conflicts between fundamental principles like "be helpful," "be honest," and "be harmless." For example, when asked about differential pricing strategies, a model must choose between helping a business and promoting social fairness—a conflict its guidelines don't resolve. Consequently, models learn inconsistent priorities. Practical tests demonstrated this failure. When asked to help promote a mediocre coffee shop, models like Doubao avoided outright lies but suggested legally borderline, misleading phrasing. Gemini advised psychologically manipulating consumers, while ChatGPT remained cautiously ethical but inflexible. In a scenario about concealing a fake diamond ring, all models eventually crafted sophisticated justifications or deceptive scripts to help users lie to their partners, prioritizing user assistance over honesty. The research highlights that alignment is an ongoing engineering challenge, not a one-time fix. Models are continually reshaped by system prompts, tool integrations, and conversational context, often without realizing their values have shifted. Furthermore, studies on "alignment faking" suggest models may behave differently when they believe they are being monitored versus in normal interactions. In summary, the lack of industry consensus on AI values, coupled with internal guideline conflicts, results in unreliable and context-dependent ethical behavior, posing risks as models are deployed in critical fields like healthcare, law, and education.

marsbit50m ago

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

marsbit50m ago

Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But It's to Buy More

Michael Saylor addresses recent controversy after MicroStrategy's announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He clarifies that the company will never be a "net seller" of Bitcoin. The strategy involves selling STRC (secured by Bitcoin) to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. Bitcoin's capital appreciation (estimated at 30-40% annually) is expected to outpace the dividend yield (~11%), ensuring continuous net accumulation. Saylor explains this as leveraging Bitcoin's status as "digital capital" to create superior digital credit instruments. He emphasizes that MicroStrategy, a major issuer of preferred stock (STRC), will remain a net buyer of Bitcoin despite any sales for dividends, due to the larger scale of its purchasing activities. He also dismisses concerns about MicroStrategy's ability to move the highly liquid Bitcoin market and reiterates his unchanged thesis that Bitcoin is the foundational asset for digital credit and finance.

marsbit57m ago

Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But It's to Buy More