Mechanism Capital Founder: Excessive Worry About Bubbles Is Foolish

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-11Last updated on 2026-02-11

Abstract

Mechanism Capital founder Andrew Kang argues that excessive worry about market bubbles is misguided in the current technological landscape. He emphasizes that we are at a uniquely asymmetric moment in history, driven by exponential advancements in AI, robotics, energy, and other innovative fields. Short-term volatility and corrections are noise compared to the long-term transformative potential of these technologies. Kang predicts a near-future "singularity" with billions of AI agents, humanoid robots, space data centers, multi-planetary colonization, and revolutionary medical therapies. He states that the technological progress and economic growth compressed into the next 20 years will surpass the entirety of human history. Companies leveraging AI are already seeing order-of-magnitude improvements in productivity. Traditional valuation models are inadequate for pricing this unprecedented growth, which could reach "20-sigma" levels in historical statistical terms. The wealth creation will be extreme, and those without exposure will find it difficult to enter the market later. Kang advises adopting a long-term, exponential mindset and avoiding short-term trading, as the potential upside represents the largest asymmetric opportunity in history.

Original Author:Andrew Kang, Founder of Mechanism Capital

Compiled by: Ken, Chaincatcher

For those who have experienced at least one full market cycle, you develop an instinct to be wary of price increases that far exceed historical growth rates. Witnessing the dot-com bubble, the 2008 global financial crisis, and the rise and fall of cryptocurrencies sets off pattern recognition alarms in your brain. You are afraid to enter the market because prices are too high, and you want to sell your assets for fear of being at a peak.

But it is important to recognize that we are in one of the most profound and unique asymmetric moments in history. The only move right now is to extend your time horizon and completely abandon short-termism.

Excessive worry about bubbles is foolish. Trying to time the market is also foolish. Short-term fluctuations and corrections will always happen, but given how close we are to the "singularity," these fluctuations are completely just noise. Artificial intelligence, robotics, energy, and innovation are about to experience runaway explosive growth.

Within the next decade, we will have billions (or more) of AI agent workforces, humanoid robots, space data centers, multi-planetary colonization, and significantly improved medical therapies; we will fundamentally change the development pace and output of technological breakthroughs in all fields. The technological progress and economic growth we compress into the next twenty years will exceed the sum total of all human civilization history.

We are already in an extremely steep phase of the J-curve, but this is hard to perceive when we zoom in to the micro level of daily or weekly views. 100% of Anthropic's product code is now written by Claude. Product managers have a virtual team of software engineers, so efficient it's as if they can change time. The improvement in product iteration speed for companies that efficiently utilize AI is not single-digit, not double-digit, but triple-digit.

Moreover, the capabilities of these tools are still evolving at an even faster rate. Whether we officially achieve Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) in 2027 or 2029 doesn't really matter. It will happen. By the time it's officially announced, the assets you want to own will have already multiplied in price.

It is highly likely that the actual economic growth over the next 3-10 years will be on the order of 20 standard deviations (20-sigma) in any historical distribution model. This growth, once considered almost impossible, will be driven by unprecedented second and third-order changes. Traditional valuation models cannot price these transformations. The potential upside is so vast that traditional present value calculations struggle to capture them.

The speed of wealth appreciation will be staggering, much like how cryptocurrencies initially created numerous billionaires and millionaires in a short time, but the magnitude this time will be far more extreme. If you have no exposure, it will be difficult to pull the trigger and buy into such vertically rising asset prices; but unlike previous bubbles, the creation of real economic value will better keep pace with the vertical rise in asset prices. Over the past three years, those operating in the market with the cognition of an "exponential perspective" have reaped significant rewards. If you haven't adopted this perspective yet, it's not too late.

While it's important to always be mindful of downside risk, this is the largest upside risk in world history. Learn to bear risk over longer time horizons. Now is not the time for swing trading. For the vast majority of people, long-term investing typically outperforms short-term trading, but the gap in expected value between "trading" and "investing" will be wider than ever before. Ask yourself, what is the value of the call option embedded in the singularity?

Related Questions

QAccording to Andrew Kang, why is it foolish to be overly concerned about market bubbles in the current economic climate?

AHe believes we are at a profoundly unique asymmetric moment in history, where the potential upside from technological advancements like AI, robotics, and energy innovation is so immense that short-term volatility and bubbles are merely noise. The focus should be on long-term growth rather than short-term fluctuations.

QWhat does Andrew Kang predict will be achieved in the next decade in terms of technological progress?

AHe predicts that in the next decade, we will have billions of AI agent workers, humanoid robots, space data centers, multi-planetary colonization, and significantly improved medical therapies. The technological progress and economic growth compressed into the next 20 years will exceed the sum of all human civilization history.

QHow does Andrew Kang describe the current stage of the J-curve in technological development?

AHe describes the current stage of the J-curve as extremely steep, though it is hard to perceive at a daily or weekly micro-level. Companies effectively using AI are seeing product iteration speed improvements not in single or double digits, but in triple digits.

QWhat does Andrew Kang suggest about the timing of achieving Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) and its impact on asset prices?

AHe suggests that whether ASI is achieved in 2027 or 2029 is not important because it is inevitable. By the time it is officially announced, the prices of assets one would want to own will have already increased manifold.

QAccording to the article, why might traditional valuation models fail in the current economic transformation?

ATraditional valuation models are unable to price the unprecedented second and third-order changes driven by technologies like AI. The potential upside is so vast that traditional present value calculations struggle to capture them, making historical distribution models irrelevant for predicting future growth.

Related Reads

$52M Ethereum Bet Comes As Tom Lee Says ETH Isn’t Reflecting Its Potential

Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH worth more than $10.5 billion, is nearing its goal to control 5% of Ethereum's circulating supply. Despite the company's recent purchase of 26,497 ETH (valued at roughly $52 million), Ethereum's price has struggled, trading around $2,000 and even declining recently. Bitmine's head, Tom Lee, argues that ETH prices are not reflecting the strengthening fundamentals of the Ethereum network, attributing the lag to being in the early stages of a "crypto spring." He cites long-term trends like AI commerce and tokenization as reasons for Ethereum's enduring importance. Bitmine's strategy treats Ether as a long-term reserve asset, not a short-term trade, explaining why the massive accumulation hasn't yet triggered a corresponding price rally.

bitcoinist19m ago

$52M Ethereum Bet Comes As Tom Lee Says ETH Isn’t Reflecting Its Potential

bitcoinist19m ago

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

The stock price of Marvell Technology surged 32.5% on June 2nd, driven by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang highlighting its custom ASICs and optical interconnects as core to AI data center architecture. This event brought attention to the Chinese semiconductor family behind Marvell: the Dai siblings. The story centers on three siblings, all UC Berkeley graduates, whose three-decade entrepreneurial journey aligns with major semiconductor industry shifts. In 1995, youngest sister Dai Wei Li co-founded Marvell with her husband Sehat Sutardja and his brother, focusing on storage controllers. Eldest brother Dai Wei Min founded EDA company Ultima, later sold to Cadence, and later founded VeriSilicon (芯原) in China, becoming a leading semiconductor IP provider. Second brother Dai Wei Jin co-founded EDA firm Silicon Perspective (sold to Cadence) and GPU IP company Vivante, later acquired by VeriSilicon. The combined "Dai-Sutardja" family network extends beyond Marvell. Their ventures and investments form a comprehensive ecosystem for the post-Moore's Law, chiplet era. Key holdings include: Dream Big Semiconductor (AI SuperNICs, acquired by Arm), Alphawave (high-speed SerDes IP, acquired by Qualcomm), and Silicon Box (a chiplet advanced packaging foundry). VeriSilicon itself thrives on the AI ASIC and IP boom in China. Collectively, the family's AI infrastructure-related portfolio is estimated at over $22 billion. Their strategy represents a distinct path: building critical components for open standards and key manufacturing capacity in the chiplet era, rather than pursuing standalone AI chip dominance. While this path may not create the next NVIDIA, it has enabled repeated successful exits and sustained influence within the global semiconductor industry.

marsbit1h ago

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

marsbit1h ago

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

Microsoft, once the defining force of the PC era, now faces a familiar challenge in the AI age: the risk of being relegated to a profitable but invisible infrastructure provider. This anxiety was laid bare at Build 2026, where CEO Satya Nadella unveiled a major strategic pivot. The catalyst was a quiet April agreement that dissolved Microsoft's exclusive licensing and cloud-hosting deal with OpenAI, its once-vital partner. This erased Microsoft's key AI moat. With OpenAI and Anthropic defining AI applications and gaining enterprise traction—even within Microsoft's own ranks—Nadella had to answer: without exclusivity, what is Microsoft's role? The answer was a suite of seven in-house AI models, a developer-focused AI workstation (Surface RTX Spark Dev Box), and, most crucially, the Agent 365 platform for enterprise AI governance. The models, notably targeting Anthropic's strengths in coding and enterprise, signal a defensive move. However, the broader strategy is to make the models themselves less decisive. Financially, Microsoft's AI revenue is strong, driven largely by Azure running others' models. Yet its user-facing products like Copilot show weak penetration and engagement. Microsoft earns infrastructure money but lacks direct user mindshare. Nadella's core fear is being "hollowed out." As OpenAI and Anthropic prepare for IPOs and gain financial independence, they may build their own infrastructure, threatening Azure's lucrative AI revenue stream. Microsoft's window is to entrench itself deeper: not as the model creator, but as the indispensable platform for securely deploying, managing, and governing all AI models within the enterprise through Agent 365. Build 2026 revealed Microsoft's bet: in the AI era, the ultimate power lies not in any single model, but in the enterprise "operating system" that controls them. Nadella is determined to ensure Microsoft is the driver of this new era, not just a passenger.

marsbit1h ago

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

marsbit1h ago

US Stocks Surge 16% in Two Months: Only 4 Occurrences in History, the Most Recent Was Just Before the 1987 Crash

U.S. stocks have surged 16% over April and May, a gain seen only four times since WWII, according to Deutsche Bank strategist Henry Allen. Three prior instances followed recessions, but the sole non-recession precedent was in early 1987, months before the "Black Monday" crash. The current rally is underpinned by AI enthusiasm and strong data, but its speed without an economic recovery is historically unprecedented. Meanwhile, credit spreads remain near record lows despite growing consumer strain—the U.S. savings rate hit just 2.6% in April, a level last seen before the Global Financial Crisis, and consumer sentiment is at its lowest since 1952. Market risks are concentrated. While stocks and credit markets appear immune to geopolitical tensions, sovereign bonds tell a different story. Treasury yields have tracked oil prices and recently hit multi-year highs, creating a widening divergence with equities. Surprisingly stable oil prices, despite the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, have been a key pillar for risk assets. However, if the blockage persists, this support could fade, raising the risk of a stagflation shock not currently priced in.

marsbit1h ago

US Stocks Surge 16% in Two Months: Only 4 Occurrences in History, the Most Recent Was Just Before the 1987 Crash

marsbit1h ago

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

Over the past three years, AI computing power narratives have been dominated by GPUs. However, starting in 2026, this story began to shift. While training large models remains GPU-intensive, the rapid growth of inference and AI agent workloads, which require high levels of task orchestration, concurrency, and data flow management, has highlighted a renewed critical role for CPUs. These are tasks GPUs are not designed to handle. Intel's recent launch of the Xeon 6+ processor, built on its Intel 18A process and featuring up to 288 efficiency cores (E-cores), exemplifies this strategic pivot. It is positioned not as a mere companion to GPUs but as the essential "control plane" for AI infrastructure, optimized for high-density, energy-efficient, and high-throughput workloads characteristic of AI agents and inference. This "CPU resurgence" is not about CPUs outperforming GPUs in raw computation. It reflects a systemic bottleneck: as AI scales from training single models to deploying countless intelligent agents, the demand for coordination and data handling surges. Major cloud providers are also developing their own high-density ARM-based server CPUs for similar workloads. However, Intel's success with this strategy faces significant challenges. Competition includes NVIDIA's integrated CPU-GPU solutions, the expanding adoption of cloud vendors' in-house ARM CPUs, and the crucial market test of Intel's 18A manufacturing process against rivals like TSMC's N2. In conclusion, CPUs are indeed reclaiming a central, though redefined, role in AI compute—managing the complex orchestration that enables massive-scale AI deployment. While the trend is clear, which company will ultimately lead this CPU resurgence remains an open question to be decided in the data centers of 2027 and beyond.

marsbit1h ago

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片