Matrixport Research: Tariffs Stir the Market, Bitcoin Becomes the 'First-React Asset' to Macro Volatility

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-23Last updated on 2026-01-23

Abstract

This Matrixport research report analyzes recent Bitcoin price volatility in the context of former President Trump's tariff threats. It argues that the market pullback is not due to a deterioration in crypto fundamentals, but rather a tactical repricing driven by external macro shocks. The report posits that Trump's trade strategy has evolved into a "two-step escalation" mechanism designed to create immediate liquidity shocks and strengthen negotiation leverage. Bitcoin is increasingly acting as a high-beta proxy for global liquidity, often being the first asset to price in such macro shocks, especially over weekends when traditional markets are closed. The subsequent deeper sell-off upon the reopening of equity futures suggests the moves are driven more by institutional portfolio rebalancing than retail sentiment. The analysis concludes that these tariff-induced pullbacks (typically 3%-7%) are tactical and create repeatable trading opportunities rather than signaling a structural trend reversal. As the market adapts to this pattern, the report advises investors to focus on disciplined accumulation during these liquidity-driven dips rather than overinterpreting short-term headlines.

This round of market volatility does not stem from a structural deterioration in the fundamentals of crypto assets, but rather resembles a phased repricing under external macro disturbances. The latest tariff threat from Trump should not be interpreted as traditional trade policy, but rather as a strategic tool to create market volatility and strengthen negotiation leverage. The market has gradually adapted to this rhythm: news shocks first trigger price repricing, and selling pressure is amplified when liquidity tightens; once negotiation signals are released, prices tend to stabilize relatively quickly, and trading returns to a relatively orderly state.

In this process, Bitcoin's linkage with global liquidity continues to strengthen, gradually playing the role of a high-beta proxy for global liquidity, rather than a traditional macro hedging tool. The current price pullback is more of a trading-level adjustment rather than a trend reversal.

Tariff Strategy Reshapes Volatility Rhythm: Bitcoin Becomes a Leading React Asset to Macro Shocks

Trump's trade strategy in his second term has evolved into a clear 'two-step escalation' mechanism: first announcing initial tariff arrangements, then setting higher tariff rates for subsequent tiers. This design creates immediate liquidity shocks while also providing clear time anchors for the market. Related statements often bypass traditional diplomatic channels and are concentrated on weekends, allowing Bitcoin to率先 bear the brunt of macro shocks during traditional market closures, serving as a liquidity-abundant risk pricing vehicle.

From a market reaction perspective, Bitcoin's volatility during weekends is often relatively restrained, while selling pressure significantly deepens after US stock futures resume trading. This implies that the current price adjustment is not primarily driven by retail sentiment, but rather by traditional financial participants rebalancing cross-asset risk exposures after liquidity returns. As long as the market continues to respond to this rhythm of 'maximum pressure - tactical de-escalation', Bitcoin will remain in the first reaction position to macro disturbances.

Volatility Does Not Equal a Turn: Repeatable Trading Windows in Tactical Pullbacks

Since 2025, Bitcoin's market narrative has undergone a significant shift—from an 'inflation hedge asset' to a high-beta indicator highly sensitive to changes in global liquidity. Tariff-related statements often trigger phased pullbacks of approximately 3%–7%, which are not due to deteriorating fundamentals, but rather the outcome of institutional trading desks actively deleveraging and reducing risk exposures against the backdrop of a strengthening US dollar and rising stagflation expectations.

Within this framework, tariffs are the means, volatility is the goal. This type of volatility instead constitutes repeatable trading windows: the shock phase intensifies negotiation pressure, and the period before events ease and risk appetite recovers often corresponds to a relatively favorable entry zone. Meanwhile, implied volatility has not significantly increased, also suggesting the market does not view this as a structural risk escalation.

Overall, this Bitcoin pullback is more tactical than a trend reversal. As the market gradually sees through this negotiation rhythm and incorporates its impact into pricing, Bitcoin's weight as the primary pricing vehicle for related statements may marginally decline. Against the backdrop of overall resilience in risk assets, the necessity for sustained concern is limited. For investors, rather than overinterpreting short-term headlines, it's more important to focus on changes in pricing and liquidity structure—within a disciplined framework, the value of buying on dips remains higher than concerns about a 'structural turn'.

The above section contains views from Matrix on Target, contact us to obtain the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit33m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit33m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit41m ago

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit41m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News45m ago

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News45m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit53m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit53m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit1h ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think