LUNA Countdown to Death: The "Prophetic Trade" Mystery Before the Evaporation of 40 Billion

比推Published on 2026-02-25Last updated on 2026-02-25

Abstract

Summary: In February 2026, Terraform Labs' bankruptcy liquidator filed a lawsuit against quantitative trading giant Jane Street in Manhattan federal court, alleging insider trading related to the May 2022 collapse of Terra (LUNA) and UST, which erased $40 billion in value. The complaint centers on a private chat group called "Bryce's Secret," through which Jane Street allegedly obtained non-public information. Specifically, it is claimed that Jane Street was tipped off about Terraform's plan to withdraw $150 million UST from the Curve liquidity pool. Ten minutes after the withdrawal, a wallet linked to Jane Street removed $85 million UST. Additionally, as UST crashed, Jane Street reportedly offered to buy Luna at a steep discount. This case follows a separate $4 billion lawsuit against Jump Trading, which allegedly profited from earlier UST depegging events and received secret Bitcoin transfers. Jane Street dismissed the suit as a desperate money grab, arguing the collapse was ultimately caused by Terraform's fraud. The cases highlight ongoing concerns about information asymmetry and insider advantages in crypto markets, despite their decentralized ethos.

Written by: Universe Wave Naruto, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: The Truth Behind LUNA's Collapse? Someone Predicted the Evaporation of 40 Billion Dollars 10 Minutes Early


In May 2022, 40 billion dollars evaporated within 72 hours.

It was the most devastating collapse in crypto history. UST, once hailed as the "crown jewel of algorithmic stablecoins," plummeted from 1 dollar to worthless in just a few days; Luna, once with a market cap nearing 40 billion dollars, fell from its high of 116 dollars to nearly zero.

Millions of ordinary investors lost their savings that early summer. They refreshed their screens, watching the continuously plunging K-line, unsure of what had happened or what to do.

The official explanation came quickly: flaws in the algorithmic design, Do Kwon lied, a natural market death. Most people accepted this answer, relegating that catastrophe to "another lesson in the crypto world," and moved on.

This answer held for nearly four years.

Until February 23, 2026, when Todd Snyder, the bankruptcy liquidator for Terraform Labs, filed a lawsuit in the Manhattan Federal Court. Jane Street, the world's most secretive and profitable quantitative trading giant, was thrust into the spotlight.

That question, silent for four years, finally has a new version of the answer.

Jane Street and LUNA's Secret Group Chat

To understand the weight of this accusation, one must first know who the defendant is.

To most crypto users, Jane Street might be an unfamiliar name. But on Wall Street, it is legendary—a firm that deliberately maintains a low profile yet quietly became one of the most important players in the global financial market.

Between 1999 and 2000, Tim Reynolds, Robert Granieri, Michael Jenkins—three former Susquehanna traders—alongside IBM developer Marc Gerstein, founded Jane Street in a windowless small office in New York. Starting out, they did ADR arbitrage, inconspicuous and unnoticed. But they soon set their sights on a then-niche market product: ETFs, and made it their core battleground.

This bet changed everything.

Today's Jane Street is one of the world's largest market makers, operating simultaneously in 45 countries and over 200 trading venues, holding about 24% of the primary market share for US-listed ETFs, with monthly equity trading volume reaching 2 trillion dollars. In 2024, its annual net trading revenue was 20.5 billion dollars, already on par with Bank of America and Goldman Sachs. In Q2 2025, its single-quarter net trading revenue刷新 (refreshed) to 10.1 billion dollars, with a net profit of 6.9 billion dollars, breaking the quarterly records of all major Wall Street investment banks.

3000 employees, no CEO, no traditional hierarchy, all employees compensated based on the company's overall profits. Jane Street describes itself as a "collection of puzzle solvers," while the outside world calls it an "anarchist commune"—flat, mysterious, and almost completely closed off to the media.

Its alumni list includes a familiar name: SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried) joined Jane Street in 2014 after graduating from MIT, honing his trading intuition here for three years before leaving in 2017 to establish Alameda Research and FTX. The people nurtured by this company have profoundly changed the face of the crypto world, in whatever sense.

Now, this company, known for being "low-key, precise, always on the side of information advantage," sits in the defendant's seat.

And the core of the accusation comes from a private group chat called "Bryce's Secret."

It was created by Jane Street employee Bryce Pratt. He was once an intern at Terraform, left and joined Jane Street, but his old network remained intact—both doors were open to him.

In February 2022, Pratt brought his old colleagues into this private channel, establishing an information pipeline connecting Terraform's interior with Jane Street, with the other end linked to Terraform's software engineers and business development heads. The complaint alleges that it was through this pipeline that Jane Street learned in advance about Terraform's plan to quietly withdraw funds from the Curve liquidity pool—a decision not yet announced to the public.

At 5:44 PM on May 7, 10 minutes after Terraform Labs quietly withdrew 150 million dollars in UST from the Curve 3pool, a wallet allegedly associated with Jane Street followed by pulling out 85 million dollars in UST, the largest single transaction in the pool's history.

By May 9, UST had fallen to 0.8 dollars, and signs of collapse were undeniable. At this point, Pratt messaged Do Kwon and the Terraform team via the group chat, suggesting Jane Street could consider "purchasing Luna at a significant discount."

While harvesting retail investors, they were also preparing to pick up bargains from the fire.

The defendants named in this case, besides Pratt, include Jane Street co-founder Robert Granieri—the only one of the four founders still active—and employee Michael Huang. The lawsuit cites the Commodity Exchange Act and the Securities Exchange Act, simultaneously raising charges of fraud and unjust enrichment, demanding a jury trial, and seeking compensation and disgorgement of profits.

Bloomberg, citing the core statement in the complaint, reported: Jane Street's operations allowed it to "close billions of dollars in potential risk exposure at the right moment, just hours before the collapse of the Terraform ecosystem."

Jump Trading and Deeper Darkness

The Jane Street lawsuit is not an isolated incident. Two months prior, the same liquidator, Todd Snyder, had already sued Jump Trading and its co-founder William DiSomma, along with former Jump Crypto president Kanav Kariya, in an Illinois federal court, seeking 4 billion dollars in damages.

Jump's story is, in a sense, even more shocking than Jane Street's.

The complaint reveals a picture never fully pieced together before: as early as May 2021, during UST's first de-pegging crisis, Jump secretly intervened, buying approximately 20 million dollars worth of UST to stabilize the price back to 1 dollar.

Later, the public believed the packaged algorithmic stablecoin story—the algorithm worked, the system was self-healing. Terraform借此 (took advantage of this) evade regulatory scrutiny, and Jump, in exchange, received over 61 million Luna tokens at a price of 0.40 dollars per token, when the market price was around 90 dollars—a discount of over 99%. Jump later sold these tokens, with the complaint estimating profits of around 1.28 billion dollars.

During the final collapse in May 2022, Luna Foundation Guard transferred nearly 50,000 bitcoins (approx. 1.5 billion dollars) to Jump without a written agreement, nominally for market support. The final whereabouts of these bitcoins remain unconfirmed to this day. The complaint states: "It is unclear whether Jump further enriched itself through this."

Notably: DiSomma and Kariya, during previous SEC investigative inquiries, invoked the Fifth Amendment hundreds of times to refuse to answer. Jump's subsidiary Tai Mo Shan settled with the SEC in 2024 for 123 million dollars, admitting it "misled investors." Kariya himself resigned as president of Jump Crypto the same year, citing the CFTC investigation.

More crucially, according to the Jane Street complaint, it was through Jump's information channels that Jane Street obtained some "non-public key information." The two cases are connected by an invisible thread.

But there's another half to this story.

Jane Street's response was direct: this is a "desperate lawsuit," a "transparent attempt to extract money from the company." They added that the losses of Terra and Luna investors stem from the "multi-billion dollar fraud" created by Do Kwon and Terraform management themselves, and they will vigorously fight back.

This statement is not wrong. Do Kwon pleaded guilty to fraud and was sentenced to 15 years in prison; Terraform also paid a 4.47 billion dollar fine. Luna's death spiral was destined from the mechanism's design: algorithmic stablecoins are, in essence, a system that requires continuous buy-side support and confidence maintenance. Once panic triggers, the arbitrage mechanism operates in reverse, destroying itself at an exponential rate.

But "Do Kwon is guilty" and "others are innocent" are not mutually exclusive propositions.

A building has a fatal structural flaw—that is a fact. During its collapse, whether someone took the opportunity to empty it of its most valuable items before the firefighters arrived is a separate legal and ethical question.

Another detail is worth noting. On the same day the Jane Street lawsuit was exposed, on-chain tracking researcher ZachXBT announced he would release "a major investigation into one of the crypto industry's most profitable institutions on February 26, 2026, regarding multiple employees long using internal data for insider trading." He did not name names. But the微妙 (subtle) timing made the entire crypto Twitter hold its breath in anticipation.

This story isn't over yet. But one thing is already certain: in this market that touts "decentralization," true asymmetry never disappeared; it just moved from bank trading desks to behind on-chain smart contracts, continuing to exist in a more隐蔽 (hidden) form.

The Luna incident might just be the most violent tear in that crack, and those standing on the other side of the crack had already evacuated safely long before the wall collapsed.

"The gentry's money is returned intact, the common people's money is split thirty-seventy," as in the movie, so it is in the crypto world.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7614333

Related Questions

QWhat is the core allegation against Jane Street in the Terra (LUNA) collapse lawsuit?

AThe lawsuit alleges that Jane Street used non-public information obtained through a private chat called 'Bryce's Secret' to learn about Terraform Labs' plan to secretly withdraw $150 million UST from the Curve liquidity pool. This allowed a Jane Street-associated wallet to withdraw $85 million UST just 10 minutes later, enabling them to avoid massive losses before the ecosystem's collapse.

QWho is Bryce Pratt and what role did he allegedly play in the events?

ABryce Pratt was a former Terraform Labs intern who later worked at Jane Street. He allegedly created the 'Bryce's Secret' private chat, which served as an information pipeline between Terraform insiders and Jane Street, facilitating the transfer of material non-public information.

QWhat connection does the lawsuit draw between Jane Street case and the earlier case against Jump Trading?

AThe lawsuit suggests a connection, stating that Jane Street obtained some of its 'non-public key information' through Jump Trading's information channels. This links the two cases, with Jump Trading also facing a separate $4 billion lawsuit for its alleged role in the collapse.

QHow did Jane Street respond to the allegations in the lawsuit?

AJane Street dismissed the lawsuit as a 'desperate litigation' and a 'transparent attempt to extract money from the company.' They argued that the losses were fundamentally caused by the '$10 billion fraud' manufactured by Do Kwon and Terraform Labs' management themselves.

QWhat was the alleged role of Jump Trading during UST's first depegging crisis in May 2021?

AThe lawsuit against Jump Trading alleges that during UST's first depeg in May 2021, Jump secretly intervened by buying approximately $20 million worth of UST to stabilize its price back to $1 dollar. In return, they reportedly received over 61 million Luna tokens at a massive 99%+ discount, later selling them for an estimated profit of $1.28 billion.

Related Reads

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit27m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit27m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit1h ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片