Kraken, Coinbase expand into stock trading as equities outperform crypto

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-25Last updated on 2026-02-25

Abstract

Kraken and Coinbase are expanding into stock trading to attract traditional finance investors as equities significantly outperform the crypto market. This move represents a strategic shift towards hybrid financial products. Kraken launched 24/7 perpetual futures contracts for tokenized equities like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, offering up to 20x leverage and availability in over 110 countries. Conversely, Coinbase is focusing on spot equity trading through a partnership with Yahoo Finance, with plans to introduce tokenized U.S. equities later this spring. This expansion occurs amid a major crypto market contraction, with total capitalization falling to $2.24 trillion, down 47.5% since October 2025. In contrast, the S&P 500 has gained 17% over the same period. By integrating equities, both exchanges aim to capture capital rotation, diversify revenue, and boost user engagement.

Crypto platforms are sharpening their focus on traditional finance investors as a new wave of hybrid financial products reshapes market structure.

The first meaningful bridge between digital assets and traditional markets emerged through crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

These vehicles gave institutional and retail TradFi investors regulated exposure to digital assets such as Bitcoin, drawing approximately $54.4 billion in Asset Under Management (AUM).

That success demonstrated sustained demand for structured crypto-linked products.

Now, exchanges are taking the next step by introducing stock-based trading features and positioning themselves as comprehensive financial platforms capable of capturing a broader share of global capital flows.

Kraken, Coinbase target traditional finance investors

On the 24th of February, Kraken announced the launch of xStock perpetual Futures contracts, enabling 24/7 trading of tokenized equities backed 1:1 by their underlying shares.

The exchange confirmed that the product will be accessible to users in more than 110 countries.

Through instruments such as SPYx Perps, QQQx Perps, and GLDx Perps, investors can gain exposure to major benchmarks and commodities while tracking their respective underlying assets—the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and gold.

Kraken’s perpetual stock contracts will support leverage of up to 20x, offering significantly greater exposure than traditional spot equity trading.

Coinbase, in contrast, has opted to focus on spot equity trading. Its recent partnership with Yahoo Finance allows users to trade selected stocks directly within the Coinbase One app.

While Kraken offers continuous 24/7 trading, Coinbase’s stock trading will operate around the clock but remain limited to five days per week, aligning more closely with traditional equity market structure.

The company also disclosed plans to roll out tokenized U.S. equities and tokenized perpetual stock products later this spring.

Mark Greenberg, Kraken’s Global Head of Consumer, described the initiative as “a new chapter for global capital markets,” stating:

“[Regulated tokenized equities] trade with the same speed, accessibility, and flexibility as crypto via tokenization, delivering a more efficient risk management experience.”

Expansion comes amid crypto market contraction

The expansion into equities comes at a time when liquidity has tightened significantly across the cryptocurrency market, prompting investors to reassess asset allocation.

At the time of writing, approximately $2.03 trillion has exited the crypto market, leaving total capitalization near $2.24 trillion.

A further 2.5% decline would effectively bring cumulative capital outflows in line with current market value.

Technical data show the crypto market has fallen 47.5% since the October 6, 2025 crash. On a year-to-date basis, it has declined 30.8%.

By comparison, the S&P 500 (blue line)—widely used as a benchmark for U.S. publicly traded equities—has gained 17% over the same post-crash period and recorded only a 2.74% drawdown since the start of the year.

With equities outperforming digital assets, Kraken and Coinbase appear to be positioning themselves to capture capital rotation rather than compete against it.

The strategy could expand user engagement and diversify revenue streams, particularly as Coinbase reports a 22% decline in fourth-quarter revenue.

In the near term, investors continue to accumulate crypto-related equities. Over the past 24 hours, these stocks have risen approximately 3.4%, while market capitalization reached $1.8 billion, according to SosoValue.


Final Summary

  • Kraken and Coinbase are moving to attract institutional capital by integrating stock trading into their platforms.
  • Equities have outperformed the broader crypto market since the crash on the 6th of October.

Related Questions

QWhat new type of product did Kraken launch to enable 24/7 trading of tokenized equities?

AKraken launched xStock perpetual Futures contracts, which are backed 1:1 by their underlying shares.

QHow does Coinbase's approach to stock trading differ from Kraken's in terms of trading hours?

ACoinbase's stock trading operates around the clock but is limited to five days per week, while Kraken offers continuous 24/7 trading.

QWhat was the main driver for crypto platforms like Kraken and Coinbase to expand into stock trading?

AEquities have significantly outperformed the crypto market since the October 6, 2025 crash, with the S&P 500 gaining 17% while crypto declined 30.8% year-to-date.

QWhat advantage do Kraken's perpetual stock contracts offer over traditional spot equity trading?

AKraken's perpetual stock contracts support leverage of up to 20x, offering significantly greater exposure than traditional spot equity trading.

QHow much capital has exited the crypto market according to the article, and what is the current total market capitalization?

AApproximately $2.03 trillion has exited the crypto market, leaving total capitalization near $2.24 trillion.

Related Reads

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit5m ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit5m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手5m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手5m ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2h ago

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

The article discusses the immense popularity of the "2x Long SK Hynix ETF" (07709.HK) in Hong Kong, which became the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF by May 2026. Launched in October 2025, the ETF's net value soared over 1000% in seven months, significantly outperforming the 324% gain of SK Hynix's underlying stock, driven by the AI boom and a critical shift in industry demand from computing power to memory. It highlights the mechanics and risks of daily-rebalanced leveraged ETFs. In a smooth bullish market, they generate amplified returns, but during volatile periods—exemplified by market swings during geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz in March-April 2026—they suffer severe "volatility decay," where choppy price action can cause losses far exceeding twice the drop of the underlying asset. The piece frames SK Hynix, as NVIDIA's primary HBM supplier, within the classic cycle of the memory chip industry—a commoditized sector prone to boom-and-bust cycles of shortage, price hikes, overcapacity, and crashes. While current AI-driven demand and high margins (Q1 2026毛利率~79%) create a "super cycle," the article questions its sustainability. It warns that extreme profits will inevitably tempt competitors like Samsung and Micron to ramp up HBM production, potentially eroding scarcity. Furthermore, the entire narrative remains tethered to the massive AI capital expenditure of tech giants. In conclusion, the ETF's trajectory symbolizes the accelerated, all-in nature of the current AI revolution, where timeframes are compressed and market moves are extreme. However, it also underscores that while industry trends define ultimate returns, macro-geopolitical risks dictate the volatile and uncertain path to get there.

marsbit2h ago

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片