Kalshi Seeks Approval to Involve Cryptocurrency Experts in Stock and Copper Trading

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-19Last updated on 2026-08-19

Abstract

Kalshi, a federally regulated exchange, has filed proposals with the CFTC for approval of perpetual futures contracts based on a major US stock index and copper. If approved, these contracts would bring a trading structure popularized in cryptocurrency markets to traditional equities and commodities. Perpetual futures, or "perps," are a dominant force in crypto derivatives trading. They allow leveraged positions to be held indefinitely without expiry, using periodic funding payments to keep the contract price aligned with the underlying asset. While the concept was proposed by economist Robert Shiller in 1993, it gained mainstream traction in crypto. Kalshi's proposed US500 contract would track the MerQube US Large Cap Index. The COPPERPERP contract would measure the current copper price using data from the Pyth network. Both await CFTC sanction under Regulation 40.3 before they can be listed. This move follows the CFTC's approval of Kalshi's Bitcoin perpetual contract in May. The exchange now offers perps for 13 cryptocurrencies. Expanding into stocks and metals marks a significant step for Kalshi, known primarily for event contracts, as it aims to become a broader derivatives platform. The initiative raises the question of whether crypto-native trading mechanisms can benefit traditional assets. Coinbase Institutional has suggested that perpetuals, with their constant availability and capital efficiency, could appeal to a new generation of traders and evolve beyond lever...

Kalshi is attempting to bring one of the most unique cryptocurrency trading products to traditional markets. On August 18, the federally regulated exchange submitted two proposals to the CFTC for approval of perpetual futures contracts based on a major U.S. stock index and copper. If approved, these contracts would bring a structure that originated in the cryptocurrency sphere to stock and commodity markets.

This is significant because perpetual futures, or "perps," have become an integral part of crypto trading. Researchers from Cornell University estimate that perpetual futures account for 93% of all cryptocurrency derivative trading volume. The reason for their popularity is simple. Traders can maintain leveraged trades without the need to renew contracts upon expiration, while simultaneously receiving regular payments that keep the prices aligned with the underlying market.

The idea of perpetual futures is not new. Economist Robert Shiller proposed a structure for trading perpetual futures back in 1993.

"A perpetual futures contract is proposed, under which cash payments will be made every day..." — Robert J. Shiller, 1993.

However, the product gained wider recognition specifically within the cryptocurrency sphere.

Stock Index and Metal, with Prices Derived from Python Data

Kalshi's US500 contract will track the MerQube US Large Cap Index, which consists of the 500 largest companies listed on U.S. exchanges and uses free-float adjusted market capitalization to determine their weighting.

The second proposed contract, COPPERPERP, is used to measure the current price of copper in dollars per pound using XCU/USD data from the Python network.

Currently, neither product has been approved. Their applications fall under Regulation 40.3, meaning Kalshi must await CFTC sanction before launching the products for sale.

Perpetual contracts differ in structure from regular futures contracts in that they have no expiration date. Traders can hold long or short positions indefinitely, with funds being paid out to maintain the perpetual contract's price alignment with the underlying asset.

From Bitcoin in May to Stocks in August

Kalshi's move towards non-crypto assets came after a regulatory easing earlier this year.

On May 29, the CFTC approved Kalshi's Bitcoin contract, issuing a statement indicating that other perpetual contracts would be reviewed under Regulation 40.3.

Bitcoin perps were launched in early June, later joined by Ether, XRP, and several other crypto assets.

As Cryptopolitan reported, Kalshi now offers perpetual contracts for 13 cryptocurrencies.

The stock index and copper perps take this idea much further. For an exchange best known for its event contracts, this is another step towards competing as a broader derivatives trading platform.

Why Crypto Traders Should Pay Attention to Copper Contracts

However, the broader question is not about copper itself, but whether a trading approach rooted in cryptocurrency can be beneficial for traditional assets.

In its "Crypto Market Evolution Forecast 2026" report, Coinbase Institutional put forward this idea.

"The use of digital assets as collateral could become the preferred choice for a new generation of retail traders." — Coinbase Institutional

Coinbase highlights constant availability and efficient use of capital as key advantages. Furthermore, the firm believes perpetuals have evolved beyond being just leveraged products and are gradually becoming elements of lending, collateral, and hedging systems.

If regulated U.S. exchanges can successfully attract traders for stocks and commodities, cryptocurrency would be exporting one of its most efficient market structures to traditional financial markets. Moreover, this could create a more competitive environment for trading volumes as traditional and crypto-focused platforms continue to intertwine.

A Small Book Gaining Momentum Rapidly

Currently, Kalshi's business capacity for perpetual contracts is limited.

According to Cryptopolitan, Kalshi's daily open interest for crypto perps reached a record high of $17.98 million. For comparison, Hyperliquid had an open interest of about $11.7 billion across 377 trading pairs, meaning Kalshi currently holds only about 0.15% of that amount.

However, its expansion has been rapid. Kalshi's perp order volume reached $1 billion in the week after launch, while the company's event contract business took about 40 months to reach that milestone.

But such expansion comes with risks. In June, the CME Group filed a lawsuit against the CFTC and its Chairman Michael Selig regarding the approval of Kalshi's Bitcoin contract, as well as the general policy on perpetual contracts. CME argues that this type of offering should be classified as swaps, not futures.

This case, along with the CFTC's review of the documents Kalshi filed in August, will ultimately determine whether US500 and COPPERPERP reach the market.

Related Questions

QWhat new financial products is Kalshi attempting to introduce to traditional markets, as mentioned in the article?

AKalshi is attempting to introduce perpetual futures contracts based on a major US stock index (specifically the MerQube US Large Cap Index) and on copper (using XCU/USD data from Python).

QAccording to the article, what key feature distinguishes perpetual futures contracts from traditional futures?

APerpetual futures contracts have no expiry date, allowing traders to maintain leveraged long or short positions indefinitely. They also include regular funding payments to keep the contract price aligned with the underlying asset's spot price.

QWhat regulatory approval did Kalshi receive earlier in the year that paved the way for its current proposals?

AOn May 29, the CFTC approved Kalshi's Bitcoin perpetual contract and issued a statement indicating that other perpetual contracts would be reviewed under Regulation 40.3, effectively easing the regulatory path for these products.

QWhat potential benefit does Coinbase Institutional highlight for traditional assets adopting a crypto-based trading approach like perpetual futures?

ACoinbase Institutional highlights that the use of synthetic equities as collateral could become a preferred option for a new generation of retail traders, citing perpetual availability and efficient capital use as key advantages.

QWhat major legal challenge is mentioned that could impact the launch of Kalshi's proposed US500 and COPPERPERP contracts?

AIn June, CME Group filed a lawsuit against the CFTC and its Chairman, Michael Seli, challenging the approval of Kalshi's Bitcoin contract and the general policy on perpetual futures. CME argues such offerings should be classified as swaps, not futures, which could impact the approval of the new contracts.

Related Reads

NVIDIA's Huang Jensen Blasts AI Researchers: 27-Year-Old Researcher Claims AI Will 'Kill All Humans'

NVIDIA's CEO Jensen Huang has publicly criticized a viral resignation post from a 27-year-old AI researcher, Jacob Coxon, calling it "absurd" and "arrogant." Coxon, who left Anthropic just before his stock options vested, warned in his post that the race toward self-improving superintelligent AI is an existential gamble for humanity. His warnings were echoed by Anthropic's own alignment lead, Evan Hubinger, who personally estimated a greater than 10% chance of human extinction from AI within a decade. In a CBS interview, Coxon outlined a scenario reminiscent of *The Terminator*, where a sufficiently advanced AI could replicate itself across networks, manipulate humans for resources, and even engineer novel pathogens. He argued that individual opt-outs are meaningless and that only governmental or supranational intervention can impose necessary safeguards. The debate highlights a fundamental rift in the AI community and the lack of a formal, provable framework for AI safety. Enter Jacob Tsimerman, a recent Fields Medalist who shocked the mathematics world by leaving pure math to focus on AI safety. He has founded the Mathematical AI Safety Institute (MAISI), aiming to bring rigorous, cryptographic-style proofs to the field. The institute plans to use tools like zero-knowledge proofs to create verifiable standards for AI behavior and robustness. The core conflict is shifting from a battle of beliefs—between Huang's dismissal of existential risk and the researchers' dire warnings—to a race to establish a mathematical foundation for safety. Tsimerman's mission is to define the very problems that need solving, asserting that vastly higher safety standards are not just ideal but essential. However, with insiders like Coxon suggesting the critical window is only one to two years away, the timeline for developing these proofs remains intensely pressured.

marsbit27m ago

NVIDIA's Huang Jensen Blasts AI Researchers: 27-Year-Old Researcher Claims AI Will 'Kill All Humans'

marsbit27m ago

$680 Million Warning: Majority of DeFi Attacks Occur Outside Audited Scope

"Audited" is often seen as a blanket security guarantee in DeFi. However, a new analysis reveals a critical gap: most major attacks exploit components *outside* the scope of those audits. Security firm ack3 and researchers analyzed 135 security incidents from the first half of 2026, totaling $939.86 million in losses. Of the 68 incidents with identifiable pre-attack audits, 46 attack vectors (67.6% of the sample) fell completely outside any reviewed code. These "out-of-scope" attacks accounted for a staggering 94.4% of the reported losses in that group. The data highlights a fundamental trust issue: a project's "audited" status does not mean its entire live system—including upgrades, admin keys, frontends, oracles, or cloud infrastructure—has been reviewed. Two August incidents illustrate this disconnect. In the ICON Network replay attack, a mismatch between two *individually* audited modules allowed massive duplicate withdrawals. The failure occurred at the boundary of their separate audit scopes. Separately, an aelf network intrusion involved a runtime vulnerability; existing public audit reports cannot clearly map the attack path to a pre-reviewed component. The conclusion is not that audits are useless, but that their scope is limited and degrades over time. Users need transparency: which code version was audited, what was excluded, and what mechanisms (like alerts and emergency response) are in place for the *currently deployed* system. An audit badge alone cannot confirm if the reviewed code, the live deployment, and the incident response all reside within the same security boundary.

marsbit30m ago

$680 Million Warning: Majority of DeFi Attacks Occur Outside Audited Scope

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片