Judgment from a Crypto VC: The Final Stop is Here, All Passengers Please Disembark

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-28Last updated on 2026-05-28

Abstract

A crypto VC firm declares the end of the line: the era driven by retail speculation and crypto-native ideology is over. The future belongs to the large-scale, institutional adoption of blockchain technology, stripped of its decentralized ethos. While retail became distracted by memecoins, major institutions—banks, payment giants—entered en masse, recognizing blockchain's unparalleled efficiency for value transfer. Their goal isn't to embrace decentralization but to build proprietary, controlled networks, adopting the technology while discarding its foundational philosophy. This marks the transition from a "crypto industry" to a "digital asset economy"—a foundational layer powering mainstream finance, not a separate rebellion. Trillions in assets are poised for tokenization, but largely through traditional, regulated channels. For builders and investors, the old playbook of launching low-float, high-FDV tokens for retail speculation is dead. The new imperative is to build robust infrastructure that serves institutional needs: compliance, security, and seamless integration into existing financial systems. The real opportunity lies not in fighting this shift but in enabling it, as institutions become the primary conduit for onboarding the next billion users and tokenizing the next hundred trillion dollars in assets. The game has fundamentally changed.

Author: Avishay Ovadia (Founding Partner, Collider)

Compiled by: TechFlow

TechFlow Introduction: Collider is an Israeli crypto VC. Although not a large fund, its views can reflect some judgments from upstream industry practitioners.

Its Founding Partner Avishay Ovadia wrote an article on the direction of the crypto industry: The era of retail investors is over. Institutions are not here to 'embrace decentralization'; they are here to take apart the components.

They want blockchain's efficiency, not crypto's ideology. For entrepreneurs and investors, the old playbook is obsolete. The rules of the digital asset economy have completely changed.

Main Text:

For a decade, we told ourselves a fairy tale.

We believed mass adoption of crypto would be a bottom-up revolution. Ordinary people, retail investors, would grow tired of banks, swallow the orange pill, and migrate to a permissionless utopia.

Last year, that fantasy was permanently disproven.

The visitors flooding in were not the users we expected; they were gamblers. They weren't looking for a new financial system; they were looking for a casino with higher leverage. They traded memecoins, took profit from each other, and disappeared into the shadows when the music stopped.

But while retail was busy losing money on memecoins, something more important happened. Those 'giants'—institutions, banks, payment behemoths—did not leave. They went all in.

They weren't here because they believed in decentralization. They discovered blockchain is the most efficient pipeline for moving value ever created. They weren't chasing a technological ideal; they were chasing profits. Larry Fink recently said tokenization is one of two major trends reshaping financial services. We are no longer talking about a niche market, but a $140 trillion transformation.

The Great Transfer of Power

We handed over the keys to the kingdom ourselves. We built the infrastructure, validated the concepts, and then the incumbents came to harvest the territory.

We suffered from immense hubris. We thought we could change them. We thought Bitcoin's miracle could be replicated for any altcoin. We thought they would eventually buy our useless governance tokens, our ghost-town L1s and L2s, and play by our rules. We were wrong. For institutions, relinquishing control isn't 'progress'; it's suicide. Their business models are built on control.

So they didn't come to play in our mud. The vast majority of institutions won't join our DAOs, nor care about our 'community vibes'. They are building their own walled gardens, joining ecosystems like Canton, Zero, Tempo, Kinexys, building orchestration layers that connect traditional platforms to new chains. They are using blockchain, tokenization, instant settlement, self-custody, but stripping away the 'crypto' skin.

They are keeping user privacy, data silos, and profits. They are taking our open-source code, forking our protocols, but not buying our tokens. Swallowing the technology, spitting out the ideology.

The Game's Evolutionary Path

The game has evolved along a predictable, chaotic trajectory to this final station today.

From 2009 to 2014 was the Bitcoin Anarchists phase, a small group of cypherpunks tinkering on the fringe. Then came the Crypto Industry phase, with Ethereum and smart contracts taking center stage. By the 2018 bear market, the narrative shifted to Blockchain Technology, with enterprises trying to unbundle the ledger from the asset, but failing. Then came the rise and spectacular collapse of Web3, with NFTs, GameFi, and the creator economy shining briefly until FTX imploded and turned off all the lights. In 2024, propelled by an election year and the Trump candidacy, the Crypto Industry made a glorious return, only to slide into a season of greed, disgust, and toxicity.

Now, in this new bear market, we have finally arrived at the destination we've been racing towards: the Digital Asset Economy.

This is the final stop. Crypto is no longer an 'industry'; it has become an infrastructure layer. It is the invisible engine powering the world of fintech. It's not crypto eating Wall Street; it's Wall Street eating us.

This is Actually Good News

If you're a purist, this feels like betrayal. If you're a strategist, this is where the real money is.

We have finally reached the node where trillions of dollars are waiting to be deployed. We have entered the 'Distributor Era'. Big money doesn't move without regulation, KYC, and bank-sanctioned rails. DTCC announcing it will tokenize assets held by DTC and support liquid assets like the Russell 1000 index—this isn't a pilot; it's the sound of the floodgates opening.

We are about to tokenize every asset on Earth, from real estate to private credit to government bonds. But most of it won't happen through decentralized swaps on public chains. It will happen through payment giants and banks.

Operating the Machine

Two paths. You can sit in a corner and cry 'the crypto spirit is dead,' or you can recognize we just won the biggest war in financial history. We convinced the world this technology works. Now, we have to build for the people who actually have the capital to use it.

The future of this industry isn't in vaporware tokens. It's embedded in the hard infrastructure serving the new players. It's running today: look at the institutional-grade solutions already broadcasting trillions of dollars in transactions on-chain, trading billions between institutions, tokenizing billions in assets. This is the new application layer.

The New Playbook

Stop being a 'crypto bro.' Start thinking like a fintech veteran.

Think: If every asset on Earth is tokenized, what competitive advantage does buying your particular 'crypto' token have? If you can trade any global asset 24/7, with instant settlement, through a trusted traditional broker, why would you send money to an offshore exchange or sweat over a non-custodial wallet? Why worry about hacks and total loss, instead of trading easily and safely through your existing financial dashboard?

Entrepreneurs, don't build in a vacuum. Before writing the first line of code, visit every distribution link in the chain. Understand their needs, dive deep into their fears: fear of regulatory crackdowns, fear of losing control, fear of unmanageable security incidents. Your job is to create something they can't build themselves but fits perfectly into their existing world.

Investors, the old playbook is dead. The days of early investing in low-float, high-FDV vaporware and praying for retail to provide a 100x exit are over. Digital asset investing is becoming brutally hard. We are moving towards real sales cycles, real utility, and revenue-generating businesses. You need to invest in projects with real moats in a world of open-source technology. 99.99% of tokens don't have that. Finding projects with strong moats, top-tier teams, real usage, token value accrual, institutional adoption, reasonable valuations, healthy vesting schedules, active communities, high liquidity, risk management capabilities, and market opportunity is hard. But it can be done.

Stop fighting the institutions. They *are* the new distribution channels. They will bring the next billion users and the next $100 trillion into the digital asset economy. Even if those users have no idea they're using a blockchain.

The game has changed. The players are bigger. The stakes are higher. Welcome to the final stop. What you do next is up to you.

Related Questions

QAccording to the author from Collider VC, what marks the end of the 'crypto fairytale' and the start of a new era?

AThe influx of speculators chasing memecoins and the full-scale entry of large institutions like banks and payment giants, who are adopting blockchain for its efficiency while stripping away its ideological 'crypto' layer, mark the end of the old narrative. This signals the arrival of the 'digital asset economy' era.

QWhat is the author's view on how traditional institutions are adopting blockchain technology?

AThe author believes traditional institutions are not embracing the decentralized, permissionless ideology of crypto. Instead, they are 'harvesting the territory' by taking the open-source technology, forking protocols, and building their own walled-garden ecosystems (like Canton, Zero) to gain efficiency, control, privacy, and profit without buying into the native crypto tokens or communities.

QWhat does the author identify as the 'final destination' for the evolution of the crypto space?

AThe 'final destination' is the 'Digital Asset Economy,' where crypto/blockchain ceases to be a standalone industry and becomes an invisible foundational engine powering the broader financial technology world. It's characterized by the large-scale tokenization of all assets through traditional financial gatekeepers.

QWhat new advice does the author give to entrepreneurs in this new 'digital asset economy'?

AThe author advises entrepreneurs to stop building in a vacuum. They must thoroughly understand the needs and fears (like regulatory risk, loss of control) of traditional distribution channels (banks, payment giants) before writing code. They should build solutions that seamlessly integrate into the existing financial world, serving as the hard infrastructure for these new, powerful players.

QHow has the investment thesis changed for venture capitalists according to the article?

AThe old model of investing in low-float, high-FDV tokens hoping for retail-driven 100x pumps is dead. Investment now requires finding projects with real moats in an open-source world, genuine utility, revenue, institutional adoption, reasonable valuations, healthy tokenomics, and active communities. It's about backing real businesses in the digital asset economy, not speculative assets.

Related Reads

End of the 'Gray Era' for Hong Kong and US Stock Trading Accounts: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

Hong Kong and US stock “grey account opening era” ends, where can your money go? In a coordinated regulatory crackdown starting May 22nd, Hong Kong's SFC and China's securities regulator have targeted the previously common but legally ambiguous practice of mainland Chinese investors opening accounts with Hong Kong brokers to trade Hong Kong and US stocks. The SFC issued a stern circular after a review of 12 brokerages, citing major deficiencies including inadequate due diligence, acceptance of suspicious or forged documents, and weak management of cross-border relationships. New requirements mandate mainland clients to submit a written declaration confirming their investment funds originate from *outside* mainland China, the account has never been closed for using suspicious documents, and agreeing to information disclosure. Brokers must immediately close accounts opened with suspicious documents and dormant accounts. Simultaneously, Chinese authorities launched a two-year campaign to rectify illegal cross-border securities activities. Key internet brokers like Futu, Tiger Brokers, and Longbridge are facing penalties, with existing accounts allowed only to sell/withdraw funds, not add new ones. The impact is immediate. Reports from social media and financial news outlets confirm that individuals traveling to Hong Kong to open accounts are now required to sign the new declaration. However, even after signing, applications are frequently rejected. The declaration shifts compliance responsibility to the client and acts as a filter, as most mainland investors' funds do not legally meet the "from outside China" criterion. Major brokers like Futu and Tiger have stopped accepting new mainland clients. A few, such as uSmart Securities, Fosun Wealth, and Cheerful Investment, still offer limited channels, but approvals have tightened significantly. Crucially, funding must now come exclusively from the investor's own bank account in Hong Kong or a qualified jurisdiction, blocking previous workarounds like using money changers or stablecoins. For mainland investors, compliant pathways still exist but are narrower. Individuals with overseas status (students, work visa holders) and verifiable offshore funds may still qualify. Official channels like Stock Connect, QDII, and the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect remain fully compliant options, albeit with product and quota limitations. On-chain alternatives exist but carry their own regulatory uncertainties and often exclude mainland users. The crackdown signals the end of the lax expansion period for Hong Kong brokers targeting mainland clients. While investment opportunities persist, the era of easy, low-compliance access is over. Investors must now carefully assess their eligibility and understand that signing the new declaration carries personal legal liability.

Odaily星球日报11m ago

End of the 'Gray Era' for Hong Kong and US Stock Trading Accounts: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

Odaily星球日报11m ago

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: A Quick Guide to 17 Related Stocks

**Title: SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: Analysis of 17 Related Stocks** SpaceX is set to IPO on Nasdaq with a $1.75 trillion valuation. The real value driver is Starlink, contributing 61% of Q1 revenue with high margins. Its valuation heavily depends on future execution, including user growth despite falling ARPU. Key stocks have already surged pre-IPO. Tesla (TSLA, +10%) is a primary beneficiary due to deep integration with SpaceX in chip design and AI. Rocket Lab (RKLB, +89%) is seen as a "mini-SpaceX," but faces risk from potential Neutron rocket delays. AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) competes in the same satellite-to-phone market as Starlink. Firefly (FLY, +70%) is a strong government contractor in lunar services. Partners like EchoStar (SATS), Planet Labs (PL), and T-Mobile (TMUS) will see revaluation. Suppliers like Qualcomm (QCOM, +57%) are critical ecosystem "picks and shovels." Investment vehicles like DXYZ (+80%) hold significant SpaceX stakes but trade at high premiums, which may collapse post-IPO. Redwire (RDW) is highlighted as an under-the-radar "pick and shovel" play in space components, with growth in defense contracts and microgravity pharmaceuticals. The article warns that much of the positive news is already priced in, and a post-IPO sell-off is possible. Large IPOs often underperform initially. Key risks include Starship delays, ARPU decline, and unforeseen black swan events affecting Elon Musk or space operations. Investors are advised to focus on companies with solid fundamentals and manage overall sector exposure carefully.

marsbit13m ago

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: A Quick Guide to 17 Related Stocks

marsbit13m ago

Conversation with VanEck CEO: Memory Chip Stocks Are a Bubble, Bitcoin Will Stay but Token Ecosystems Will Disappear

In this podcast, VanEck CEO Jan van Eck discusses his investment outlook centered on three key long-term ("10-year macro") themes: AI-driven compute demand, India's economic rise, and excessive government debt in developed nations. Regarding AI and semiconductors, van Eck believes Nvidia has transformed into a foundational "host" for AI infrastructure, possessing deep moats in software, scale, and power efficiency, making it a core holding. However, he views the recent surge in memory chip stocks as a bubble driven by temporary supply-demand imbalances and pricing power, lacking Nvidia's competitive durability. On asset management, he emphasizes that while ETFs are scale-driven tools, the decisions on which ETFs to own and how to allocate remain highly active. He expresses greatest concern over fixed-income market illiquidity and the risk of a loss of confidence in government debt sustainability. Van Eck is bullish on gold's long-term role as a global monetary alternative and highlights the dramatic policy-driven growth in nuclear energy investment. He is strongly positive on India due to its demographic trends and pro-business reforms. Discussing crypto, he labels 2026 the "year of the corporate-controlled chain," where traditional finance adopts blockchain's best features (like 24/7 operation and programmability) but retains control. He predicts a permanent "crypto winter" for many projects, with only Bitcoin, stablecoins, and the core blockchain concept surviving long-term. He sees the U.S. stablecoin bill as marginally impactful, enabling tech firms to compete with, but not replace, banks. Finally, he views the upcoming SpaceX IPO as a significant, positive liquidity event for markets and advises investors to maintain a long-term, macro perspective when making asset allocation decisions.

marsbit24m ago

Conversation with VanEck CEO: Memory Chip Stocks Are a Bubble, Bitcoin Will Stay but Token Ecosystems Will Disappear

marsbit24m ago

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbit54m ago

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbit54m ago

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

Base has officially launched Base MCP, allowing users to connect their Base Account to AI Agents to perform actions like swaps, transfers, portfolio tracking, and transaction history queries through conversational commands. This move aligns with Base's strategic focus on AI, driven by the broader competition in the emerging Agent-to-Agent payment sector. The evolution of Agent payments has accelerated. In late 2024, the primary method involved insecure browser automation. By 2025, solutions like Coinbase's x402 (providing crypto wallets for Agents), Google's AP2, and Visa's token-based system emerged. x402 has since processed 176 million transactions totaling over $70 million, with a median value between $0.01 and $0.10. Stablecoins, particularly USDC, dominate these settlements due to their negligible transaction costs compared to traditional payment fees, which are prohibitive for micro-payments. Coinbase faces competition from Stripe, which has built a comparable infrastructure for Agent payments with its Tempo blockchain, Privy wallets, Bridge routing (acquired for $1.1B), and the recently launched MPP protocol. Both companies are now competing at the application layer. The core reason AI is central to Base's strategy is to expand the scenarios for Agent payments, ensuring more transactions occur on its network. By securing a dominant position and scale advantage in this nascent field, Coinbase aims to capture the future commercial potential of Agent-driven payments. The launch of Base MCP is thus a strategic step in this larger ambition.

marsbit1h ago

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片