Is it ‘over for Solana’? 97% network activity crash sparks fresh debate

AmbcryptoPublished on 2025-12-22Last updated on 2026-04-26

Abstract

Solana’s key network activity driver, memecoins, has cratered by over 90% and dragged the price with it.

Solana’s network activity has dropped by 97% in Q4 2025, and SOL’s price crash followed too.

From a peak of over 30 million active traders in late 2024, the network’s traction has dropped to less than 1 million monthly traders in 2025.

One analyst wondered whether it was “over for Solana” amid muted activity.

Although the contraction in trading volumes in late 2025 was a broader market trend, with Bitcoin price falling by over 30%, Solana’s [SOL] case was a little more nuanced.

Solana memecoins: A risk or test bed?

Solana and Hyperliquid have been key success stories this cycle. SOL, in particular, rallied from $8 to nearly $300, over 35x growth from 2022 cycle lows.

While the chain steadied and minimized network outages, memecoins remained a key revenue driver and traffic.

During the 2025 market rout, memecoins were among the first to be hit. But Solana supporters, like Marty Party, always view memecoins as a ‘test’ for other ‘real-world’ applications.

“Memecoin gamblers left after a successful liveness test, they will be replaced by equity traders and 50m stablecoin users – catch up.”

Even so, the near-term risk of memecoin activity became apparent. SOL’s price has declined from nearly $300 to the yearly $120 support — A 58% price decline during the memecoin lull.

That being said, the chain has garnered some institutional interest, such as Visa for stablecoin settlements. However, the network resilience could be possible if network activity dominance shifts away from gambling.

Solana vs. Ethereum

Perhaps, this could close the revenue gap with Ethereum, which leads in institutional adoption. So far, in 2025, Ethereum has made over $1.4 billion in annual revenue while Solana raked in $5022 million — A 3x difference.

In 2024, however, Solana made $2.5 billion in revenue, suggesting a 5x decline this year. Anatoly Yakovenko called it a “crazy year,” adding that,

“It’s been a crazy year. Can open permissionless protocols actually grow and maintain revenues is still an open question.”

In terms of investor returns, SOL has underperformed ETH by 56% this year, a stark contrast to the over 24% relative gains made against ETH last year.

In fact, Fundstrat projected the SOL price could fall to $50-$75 range in H1 2026.

For analyst Ted Pillows, however, there was a higher chance of a 15% surge to $134-$140, citing a massive $1 billion upside liquidity of leveraged shorts.

Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s key network activity driver, memecoins, has cratered by over 90% and dragged the price with it.
  • Ethereum outperformed Solana in annual revenue threefold, contrary to the 2024 performance.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage drop in Solana's network activity in Q4 2025 and what was the corresponding price impact?

ASolana's network activity dropped by 97% in Q4 2025, and this was followed by a significant price crash for SOL.

QAccording to the article, what was a key revenue driver and source of traffic for the Solana network?

AMemecoins remained a key revenue driver and source of traffic for the Solana network.

QHow did Solana's revenue in 2025 compare to Ethereum's, and what was the difference?

AIn 2025, Ethereum made over $1.4 billion in annual revenue while Solana raked in $5022 million, a 3x difference in Ethereum's favor.

QWhat was the projected price range for SOL in H1 2026 according to Fundstrat?

AFundstrat projected the SOL price could fall to the $50-$75 range in H1 2026.

QWhat contrasting performance did SOL have against ETH in terms of investor returns between this year and last year?

AThis year, SOL has underperformed ETH by 56%, which is a stark contrast to the over 24% relative gains it made against ETH last year.

Related Reads

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit3h ago

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片