Is Crypto Over? Don't Give Up, Liquidity Relief Is Coming

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-02-02Last updated on 2026-02-02

Abstract

The article "False Narratives....and Other Thoughts" by Raoul Pal addresses the current downturn in the crypto market, arguing against the mainstream narrative that the crypto cycle is over. Pal explains that the recent price decline in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is not an isolated event but is correlated with a similar drop in SaaS stocks, as shown by comparative charts. He identifies the root cause as a temporary liquidity squeeze in the U.S. financial system, exacerbated by government shutdowns, TGA (Treasury General Account) rebuilding without monetary offset, and gold absorbing marginal liquidity that would otherwise support risk assets like crypto. Pal emphasizes that this liquidity crunch is temporary. He anticipates a resolution to the government shutdown soon, which will remove the last major obstacle to liquidity recovery. Following this, he expects a return of liquidity through measures such as eSLR adjustments, TGA drawdowns, fiscal stimulus, and eventual rate cuts. He advises investors to be patient, stressing that in a full market cycle, time is more critical than price movements. The article also corrects a misperception about potential Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, arguing he is not a hawk and would likely support rate cuts aligned with strategies to boost economic growth. Despite current market conditions, Pal remains highly optimistic about the crypto market's prospects through 2026, driven by anticipated pro-growth policies.

Original Author:Raoul Pal, CEO of Real Vision and GMI

Compiled by:CryptoLeo(@LeoAndCrypto)

This morning, Raoul Pal, CEO of Real Vision and GMI (Raoul Pal's investment bible), published an article titled "False Narratives....and Other Thoughts". Through data comparison and macro analysis, he explained the recent downturn and crisis in the crypto industry, indicating that the industry winter will soon pass, and everyone needs to be patient and not lose confidence in the industry. Odaily Planet Daily translates it as follows:

These were the insights I wrote for GMI over the weekend, hoping to bring you some confidence. I would have kept this content for GMI and Pro Macro discussions, but I know you all need this to ease your tense nerves.

Mainstream Narrative: Is Crypto Over?

The mainstream view is that Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies have crashed, this cycle is over, everything is finished, and it can't be like before. Cryptocurrencies have decoupled from other assets, this is CZ's fault, it's BlackRock's fault, etc. This is undoubtedly an attractive narrative trap, especially when mainstream coin prices are plummeting every day.

But yesterday, a GMI hedge fund client sent me a message asking if they should buy the dip in SaaS stocks, or, as everyone is saying, if Claude Code has already killed the SaaS industry.

So I started researching SaaS, and in the process, I found conclusions that debunk both the mainstream narrative about Bitcoin and the narrative about the SaaS industry. The charts for SaaS and BTC look exactly the same?

UBS SaaS Index vs. Bitcoin Trend

Indicating there is another factor that everyone is ignoring affecting this trend.

This factor is: Due to two shutdowns and issues with the US financial system's infrastructure (the reverse repo mechanism's liquidity was only fully replenished in 2024), US liquidity has been constrained. Therefore, the TGA (Treasury General Account) rebuilding in July and August had no corresponding monetary offset measures, leading to a reduction in liquidity.

So far, the low liquidity is the reason the ISM Manufacturing Index has remained low.

We usually use the Global Total Liquidity indicator because it has the highest long-term correlation with BTC and the Nasdaq, but at this stage, US Total Liquidity seems more important because the US is the main provider of global liquidity.

In this cycle, the GMI Global Total Liquidity Index leads the US Total Liquidity Index and is about to rebound (thus also driving the ISM index).

This is exactly what is affecting SaaS and BTC. Both assets are among the longest-duration assets in existence and have fallen due to the temporary withdrawal of liquidity.

Gold's rise has essentially sucked out the marginal liquidity from the system that might have flowed into the Bitcoin and SaaS markets. There isn't enough liquidity to support these assets, so high-risk assets are getting hit and falling. There's really no way around it.

Now, the US government is happening again, and the Treasury Department has taken preventive measures: after the last government shutdown, no TGA funds were used, and instead, the asset scale was increased (i.e., further loss of liquidity). This is the crisis we are facing now. It has caused violent price fluctuations, and our beloved cryptocurrency still lacks liquidity.

However,种种迹象表明,this government shutdown will be resolved this week, which will clear the last liquidity obstacle.

Odaily Note: US House Speaker Johnson said in an interview on NBC News' "Meet the Press" on Sunday that he believes he has secured Republican support votes to ensure the shutdown of some government agencies ends by Tuesday.

I have mentioned the risks of this government shutdown many times before, but it will soon be over, and then we can continue to deal with the upcoming liquidity injection, which includes measures from eSLR, partial TGA回流 (TGA回流 likely means TGA runoff or drawdown, context suggests funds returning to system), fiscal stimulus, interest rate cuts, etc., all related to the mid-term elections.

Odaily Note: US regulators' bill to relax leverage ratio requirements to ease capital pressure on several major banks like Bank of America (BAC.US).

In a full trading cycle, time is often more important than price. Price can be hit hard, but as time passes and the cycle evolves, everything will be resolved and eventually settle.

This is why I have always emphasized "patience". Events need to develop. Focusing solely on profit and loss ratios will only affect your mental health, not your investment portfolio.

The Fed's False Narrative

Regarding interest rate cuts, another false narrative is that Kevin Warsh is a hawk. This is complete nonsense; these statements are mainly from over 18 years ago.

Warsh's job and mission were to execute the strategies of the Greenspan era. Both Trump and Besant have said (details not discussed here, but the main direction is rate cuts) to keep the economy hot and assume that the productivity gains from AI will suppress core CPI increases (just like the 1995-2000 era).

Odaily Note: Greenspan is one of the longest-serving chairs in Fed history. His advocated monetary policy (controlling inflation + promoting maximum employment) was highly flexible but practically more anti-inflation prioritized, while also actively injecting liquidity during crises.

He doesn't like the balance sheet, but the system is reserve-constrained, so he likely won't change its current practices, otherwise it would destroy the credit market.

Warsh will cut rates and do nothing else. He will not interfere with Trump and Besant's actions to manage liquidity through banks. Fed Governor Milan will likely forcefully push for a full eSLR cut to accelerate this process.

If you don't believe me, believe Druck ↓

The above shows "investment guru" Stanley Druckenmiller's content on Warsh's monetary policy philosophy and his agreement with Besant upon becoming Fed Chair.

I know how difficult it is to hear optimistic narratives when the crypto market looks so dark. My SUI holdings are terrible, we don't know what or who to believe anymore. First, we have been through this many times before. When BTC falls 30%, altcoins can fall even 70%. But if they are high-quality alts, their rebound is also faster.

Mea Culpa (My Mistake)

GMI's mistake was not considering US liquidity as the current driving factor; usually, Global Total Liquidity dominates the entire cycle. But now the situation is clear, anything is possible.

The two are not unrelated. We just couldn't predict the combination punch of a series of events (reverse repo draining liquidity > TGA rebuilding > government shutdown > gold rising > another shutdown), or we failed to anticipate its impact.

It's almost over, and soon we can get back to normal work.

We cannot guarantee that every link is error-free (now with a deeper understanding), and we are still very bullish on the 2026 outlook because we understand the Trump/Besant/Warsh strategy. These three have repeatedly told us: we just need to listen and be patient. In full-cycle investing, time is more important than price.

If you are not a cycle investor and don't have such strong risk tolerance, that's completely fine. Everyone has their own style, but Julien (GMI Head of Macro Research) and I are not good at swing trading (we don't care about intra-cycle fluctuations), but we are proven and have a verifiable track record in full-cycle investing, leading the industry for the past 21 years. (Warning: We also make mistakes, like in 2009). Now is not the time to give up. Good luck, and let's achieve greater results in 2026.

Liquidity relief is on the way!

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for the recent downturn in the crypto market according to Raoul Pal?

AThe main reason is the suppression of U.S. liquidity due to two government shutdowns and issues with the U.S. financial plumbing system, which was not fully offset by monetary measures, leading to a reduction in liquidity available for risk assets like crypto and SaaS stocks.

QWhat specific event does Raoul Pal point to as the catalyst that will soon resolve the liquidity crisis?

AHe points to the resolution of the current U.S. government shutdown, which is expected to be resolved imminently, as the event that will clear the final liquidity hurdle.

QHow does Raoul Pal characterize the relationship between time and price in a full market cycle?

AHe states that in a full cycle, time is more important than price. Price can be hit hard, but as time passes and the cycle plays out, things get resolved and eventually work themselves out.

QWhat was the key mistake that GMI made in its analysis, as admitted in the article?

AThe key mistake was not identifying U.S. liquidity as the current driving factor, as it is now more dominant than global aggregate liquidity in this part of the cycle, and failing to predict the combined impact of a series of events (RRP drain, TGA rebuild, shutdown, gold rally, another shutdown).

QWhat is the overall outlook for the crypto market in 2026 according to the author's conclusion?

AThe overall outlook for 2026 is very bullish, based on an understanding of the anticipated strategies of Trump, Besant, and a potential Fed Chair Warsh, which are expected to involve liquidity injections, fiscal stimulus, and rate cuts.

Related Reads

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbit28m ago

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbit28m ago

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报41m ago

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报41m ago

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手45m ago

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手45m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片