Hyperliquid (HYPE) Drops 25% in February, Key Support Tested

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-16Last updated on 2026-02-16

Abstract

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has experienced a significant decline, dropping over 25% in February 2026. Currently trading at $29.77, it is down 5.51% in the past 24 hours. The token being 50.07% below its all-time high of $59.39 from September of the previous year. Its market capitalization stands at $7.76 billion. The token is testing a critical support level, and a further 10% decline is possible if bearish pressure continues. Technical indicators show key resistance levels at $34.21, $37.59, and $43.09, with support levels at $23.28, $19.92, and $14.44. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is neutral at 50.19. The current downturn is attributed to a lack of bullish participation rather than aggressive selling, suggesting a corrective move rather than a full trend reversal. A rebound is possible if the support holds and trading volume increases.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has been captivating strong market attention for the past few days; however, the price action tells another story. Instead of increased interest, HYPE continuously trades on a negative side, slipping over 25% since the beginning of February 2026.

At the time of writing, the token is exchanging hands at $29.77, down by 5.51% in the past 24 hours. The seven-day move remained down by 5.92% and up around 17.97% in one month’s tenure. The token also showed an upward trajectory as compared to the last year and is up around 13.11%.

The 24-hour price performance shows a low of $29.59 and a high sitting at $31.64. The token remains 50.07% down from the all-time high of $59.39 hit in September last year and 826.7% up from the all-time low of $3.20 hit in November 2024. With this, the overall market capitalisation of the token stands at $7.76 billion.

The token seems prone to another 10% in the near future as it sits near a critical support zone. If sellers continue their control, the continuing downtrend may surge. Although, the bearish pressure could immediately fade if bulls come in with conviction.

The Technical Indicator

The technical indicator shows the first resistance at $34.21, followed by second and third resistances at $37.59 and $43.09, respectively. On the other hand, the first support level sits at $23.28, with second and third support levels at $19.92 and $14.44, respectively.

The relative strength index indicates a neutral level, being at the 50.19 mark. The 20-50-100 day exponential moving averages remain at 30.37, 29.24 and 30.71. It is noteworthy that the current fall is mostly influenced by waning bullish participation instead of aggressive selling. This also suggests that the recent move is corrective regardless of a full trend reversal.

If HYPE remains at the support zone and volume restores, a rebound is possible, possibly setting the stage for one more attempt for the resistance range.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Momentum Ignites: Can MUBARAK Extend Its 11% Breakout Into a Stronger Bullish Phase?

TagsHYPEHyperliquidHyperliquid (HYPE)

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price of Hyperliquid (HYPE) and how much has it fallen in February 2026?

AThe current price of Hyperliquid (HYPE) is $29.77, and it has fallen over 25% since the beginning of February 2026.

QWhat are the first resistance and first support levels for HYPE according to the technical indicators?

AThe first resistance level is at $34.21, and the first support level is at $23.28.

QHow does the current HYPE price compare to its all-time high and all-time low?

AThe current price is 50.07% down from its all-time high of $59.39 and 826.7% up from its all-time low of $3.20.

QWhat does the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicate about the HYPE market?

AThe Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates a neutral level, being at the 50.19 mark.

QWhat is the market capitalization of the Hyperliquid (HYPE) token?

AThe market capitalization of the Hyperliquid (HYPE) token is $7.76 billion.

Related Reads

Polymarket's "2028 Presidential Election" Volume King Is... LeBron James???

An article from Odaily Planet Daily, authored by Azuma, discusses a peculiar phenomenon observed on the prediction market platform Polymarket regarding the "2028 US Presidential Election" event. Despite having a real-time probability of less than 1%, unlikely candidates such as NBA star LeBron James (with $48.41 million in trading volume), celebrity Kim Kardashian ($33.84 million), and even ineligible figures like Elon Musk ($23.14 million) and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani ($18.39 million) account for approximately 70% of the total trading volume. In contrast, high-probability candidates like Vice President JD Vance ($10.58 million), California Governor Gavin Newsom ($15.71 million), and Secretary of State Marco Rubio ($9.32 million) have significantly lower trading activity. The article explains that this counterintuitive trend is not driven by irrational speculation but by rational strategies. Polymarket offers a 4% annualized holding reward for certain markets, including the 2028 election, to maintain long-term pricing accuracy. This yield exceeds the current 5-year US Treasury rate (3.98%), attracting large investors ("whales") to hold "NO" shares on low-probability candidates for risk-free returns. Additionally, some users utilize a platform feature that allows converting a set of "NO" shares into corresponding "YES" shares for better liquidity or pricing efficiency, rather than directly buying "YES" shares for their preferred candidates. Thus, the seemingly absurd trading activity is strategically motivated.

marsbit46m ago

Polymarket's "2028 Presidential Election" Volume King Is... LeBron James???

marsbit46m ago

Dialogue with ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Is the Essence of Blockchain a Libertarian Experiment?

"ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Blockchain as a Hardcore Libertarian Experiment" In a deep-dive interview, ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo reframes the essence of blockchain, arguing it is not merely a new technology or infrastructure but a hardcore libertarian experiment. This experiment, born from the 2008 financial crisis and decades of cypherpunk ideology, tests a fundamental question: to what extent can freedom and self-organization exist without centralized trust? The discussion highlights the experiment's verified outcomes. On one hand, it has proven its core value of censorship resistance, providing critical financial lifelines for entities like WikiLeaks and individuals in hyperinflationary or sanctioned countries via tools like stablecoins. However, Yang points out a key paradox: the most successful product, USDT, is itself a centralized compromise, showing users prioritize a less-controlled pipeline over pure decentralization. On the other hand, the experiment has exposed the severe costs of this freedom—a "dark forest" without safeguards. Events like the collapses of LUNA, Celsius, and FTX, resulting in massive wealth destruction and prison sentences for founders, underscore the system's fragility and the inherent risks of an unregulated environment. Yang observes that despite decentralized protocols, human nature inevitably recreates centralized power structures, speculative frenzies, and narrative-driven cycles (from ICOs to Meme coins), where emotion and belonging often trump technological substance. Looking forward, he believes blockchain's future is significant but niche. Its real value lies in serving specific, real-world needs for financial sovereignty and bypassing traditional controls, not as a universal infrastructure replacing all centralized systems. For the average participant, Yang's crucial advice is to cultivate independent judgment. True freedom is not holding a crypto wallet, but possessing a mind resilient to groupthink and narrative hype in a high-risk, often irrational market.

marsbit1h ago

Dialogue with ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Is the Essence of Blockchain a Libertarian Experiment?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片