Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-06-09Last updated on 2026-06-09

Abstract

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million stolen from hundreds of wallets holding its H token. The attack was caused by the compromise of a private key belonging to a foundation member, leading the team to advise users against interacting with its bridge or liquidity pools. Following the incident, the price of the H token plummeted by over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping out a significant portion of its market capitalization. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and began selling them for BNB. Humanity Protocol, founded in 2024, aimed to verify human users through palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs on Polygon CDK. Despite raising $50 million across two funding rounds and achieving a unicorn valuation, the project faced prior controversies. Shortly after its June 2025 token launch, reports emerged that only about 1 million of its 9 million registered IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, allegations surfaced that the project might be a rebranded "shell" of a Chinese access control company, raising concerns about data privacy and authenticity. The project's founder, Terence Kwok, has a controversial business history. His previous venture, Tink Labs, burned through $170 million in funding before collapsing in 2020. The breach highlights the persistent critical risk of private key management in crypto....


Author: ChandlerZ, Foresight News


On June 9, according to on-chain analyst Specter's monitoring, wallets that have interacted with the digital identity project Humanity are under sustained attack. Hundreds of addresses holding H tokens have been compromised so far, with total losses exceeding $31 million. Approximately $9 million has been swapped for ETH, with another $9.9 million still held in the form of H tokens.



Humanity founder Terence Kwok subsequently confirmed the security incident, involving the leakage of a private key belonging to a foundation member. As a precaution, he advised users to temporarily refrain from interacting with the Humanity cross-chain bridge or any liquidity pools until further safety confirmation. The team is working with security experts and exchange partners to handle the situation and will continue to update the community on the progress.



The price of the H token plummeted from around 0.7 USDT to a low of 0.052 USDT, a drop of over 90% within 24 hours. At the time of writing, H is trading at 0.1368301 USDT, with its market capitalization falling from around $2 billion to approximately $35.7 million.


As of 11:00 AM on June 9, the attacker is suspected of minting 100 million new Humanity Protocol H tokens and is currently selling them off for BNB.




A Project That Never Truly 'Proved Humanity'


Humanity Protocol was founded in 2024, positioning itself as a decentralized digital identity network. Its core selling point was using palm print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs to verify whether a user is a real human. Built on Polygon CDK (zkEVM), the project claimed to solve issues like Sybil attacks, fake accounts, and AI-generated identities without exposing personal information.


This narrative attracted significant capital attention in 2024. Humanity Protocol completed two rounds of funding totaling $50 million. A $30 million seed round at a $1 billion valuation included investors like Kingsway Capital, Animoca Brands, Blockchain.com, and Shima Capital. In January 2025, another $20 million round led by Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto raised the valuation to $1.1 billion.


The Humanity Foundation also assembled numerous well-known figures, led by Animoca Brands Chairman Yat Siu. Co-founders included Mario Nawfal, founder of the international blockchain consulting firm, and Yeewai Chong, a senior investment expert from Morgan Stanley and Ortus Capital.


On June 25, 2025, the H token launched via a Fairdrop mechanism, touted as the first-ever token distribution in Web3 history exclusively to verified humans. However, two days after launch, DL News reported leaked conversations from the founder. In the dialogue, Kwok admitted that out of the 9 million Human IDs created on the network, only about 1 million had completed biometric verification, implying that up to 88% of users might be bots.


Furthermore, according to revelations from X platform users SCoin (@ LianFang _) and AB Kuai . Dong (@_FOR AB ), Humanity Protocol (H) might be a "repackaged domestic project," with APP code material libraries still containing images from Shenzhen access control manufacturer Zhangteng Information, raising doubts about its authenticity. Netizens claimed much of its social media hype was self-generated by project-side accounts, with actual user participation questionable.



AB Kuai.Dong stated that those who previously completed verification with Humanity should be cautious. Zhangteng Information is allegedly backed by a Shanghai-based outsourcing company specializing in full identity recognition outsourcing. Additionally, whistleblower SCoin claimed the project collected large amounts of users' palm print data, raising privacy and security concerns.


This was fatal for a project whose core value proposition was "proving humanity." The H token fell over 61% within two days of launch, from around $0.05 to a low of $0.018.


The Founder's Previous Unicorn Burned Through $170 Million


Terence Kwok's personal resume added a footnote of risk to the project. In 2012, 20-year-old Terence Kwok dropped out of the University of Chicago and, inspired by a $900 roaming bill received during a trip, founded Tink Labs. The company provided free smartphones (branded Handy) to hotel rooms for guests to use abroad, replacing expensive roaming fees. This concept once captivated the capital market. Tink Labs raised $170 million successively from Foxconn, SoftBank, Innovation Works, and the founder of Meitu, reaching a valuation of $1.5 billion and becoming Hong Kong's first unicorn. At its peak, Handy devices covered 600,000 hotel rooms across 82 countries.


However, Kwok's aggressive expansion strategy soon met reality. Global roaming fees continued to decline, hotels were unwilling to pay for Handy devices, and the company began losing money from 2017. According to the Financial Times, SoftBank cut off funding for a key project after discovering that Tink Labs might have diverted funds from its Japanese joint venture to other loss-making markets. In July 2019, over 100 employees from its European, Middle Eastern, and African offices did not receive their salaries. Laid-off employees smeared cake on the walls and floors as they left the Oxford office. On August 1, Tink Labs officially shut down, entering bankruptcy proceedings in January 2020. A former HR director told the FT that Kwok only cared about "making money," and the entire $170 million investment evaporated.


Six years later, Kwok returned to the market with Humanity Protocol, once again securing a unicorn valuation from Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto.


Private Key Management: An Old Problem, a New Cost


Based on current information, this attack does not involve smart contract vulnerabilities or protocol-level security flaws. The attacker obtained a private key belonging to a foundation member, representing a failure in the most traditional security management.


The security landscape for the crypto industry in 2026 was already severe. According to CCN statistics, losses from DeFi hacks in the first four months of 2026 exceeded $1 billion, with most stolen funds still unrecovered. The $286 million attack on Drift Protocol on April 1 was the largest single incident of the year. Attackers are increasingly targeting validators, RPC nodes, and governance systems, not just smart contract vulnerabilities. However, private key leaks remain one of the most devastating attack types because they bypass all on-chain security mechanisms, directly granting control of assets.


For a project already burdened with the controversy of 88% bot users and a token down over 90% from its peak, a $31 million private key leak could be the final blow to trust. As of the time of writing, Kwok stated in his declaration that the team is working with security experts and exchange partners to handle the situation but did not mention any user compensation plan or explain why the foundation member's private key lacked basic protections like multi-signature or hardware isolation.

Related Questions

QWhat was the total estimated loss in the Humanity Protocol security incident, and what were the main assets stolen?

AThe total estimated loss exceeded $31 million. Approximately $9 million was converted to ETH, and about $9.9 million remained in the form of H tokens.

QAccording to the article, what was the specific cause of the Humanity Protocol security breach?

AThe security breach was caused by the private key of a foundation member being compromised.

QWhat was a major controversy regarding Humanity Protocol's user verification process that was reported before the hack?

AA leaked conversation revealed that out of 9 million created Human IDs, only about 1 million had completed biometric verification, suggesting around 88% of users might be bots.

QWhat previous venture of Humanity Protocol's founder, Terence Kwok, failed after burning through $170 million in funding?

ATerence Kwok's previous venture was Tink Labs (branded Handy), which provided free smartphones to hotel rooms and failed after reportedly burning through $170 million in funding.

QHow did the article characterize the nature of the attack on Humanity Protocol in relation to common DeFi security failures?

AThe article characterized the attack not as a smart contract vulnerability, but as a traditional security management failure involving private key compromise, bypassing all on-chain security mechanisms.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报19m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报19m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News37m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News37m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片