Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-27Last updated on 2026-05-27

Abstract

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds Aligned in Q1: Dumping Software, Buying Chips A clear consensus emerged among major U.S. hedge funds and mutual funds in Q1: they were simultaneously selling software stocks and pouring capital into the semiconductor sector. This aggressive rotation pushed semiconductor exposure in hedge fund long portfolios to a record high. Hedge funds delivered a 7% return year-to-date, while only 30% of large-cap active mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks. The average short interest for S&P 500 constituents rose to 3% of market cap, the highest since 2011. Within technology, the structural shift was stark. Hedge funds' semiconductor weighting hit an all-time high, while software fell to its lowest since 2019. Excluding Microsoft, mutual funds' relative overexposure to semis vs. software was the largest since 2012. Microsoft was among the most net-sold stocks by both groups. Hedge funds net purchased semiconductor names like LRCX and AMAT. Strategies diverged on leverage and cash. Hedge funds increased their net exposure to near a one-year high after an initial cut. Mutual funds raised their cash allocation, though it remains historically low at 1.4%. Sector alignment was high in Industrials (both overweight) but divergent in Tech: hedge funds increased their Tech net tilt by a record 853 basis points, while mutual funds reduced theirs. Clear splits also appeared in Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Four stocks appeared on both Goldman's hedge...

Author: Zhao Ying

Source: Wall Street News

In the first quarter, U.S. hedge funds and large mutual funds reached a rare consensus: selling software and rushing into semiconductors, pushing the long-side weight of semiconductors in hedge fund portfolios to a record high.

According to Goldman Sachs' latest "Hedge Fund Trend Monitor" and "Mutual Fund Fundamentals" reports, this analysis covers 1,059 hedge funds (total equity holdings of $4.6 trillion) and 509 large active mutual funds (equity assets under management of $3.9 trillion). The reports show that hedge funds have achieved a return of 7% year-to-date, while only 30% of large mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks, lower than the historical average of 37% since 2007.

The Q1 13F filing data from the U.S. reveals a clear market consensus: hedge funds and mutual funds are simultaneously selling software stocks and flocking to the semiconductor sector. The intensity of this rotation is so great that it has pushed semiconductors' weight in hedge fund long portfolios to an all-time high.

In terms of positioning structure, hedge fund net leverage has rebounded to the 85th percentile over the past five years, near a one-year high; meanwhile, the average short interest as a percentage of market capitalization for S&P 500 constituents has risen to 3%, the highest level since 2011, indicating simultaneous intensification of market long/short activity.

Semiconductor Positioning Hits Record High, Software Faces Systematic Reduction

The structural rotation within the technology sector was the most prominent theme this quarter.

Goldman Sachs data shows that semiconductors' weight in hedge fund long portfolios has risen to its highest level on record, while software's weight has fallen to its lowest since 2019. Regarding mutual funds, their positioning in software has dropped to its lowest level since 2012. Excluding Microsoft, the magnitude of mutual fund overweight in semiconductors relative to software is also the largest since 2012.

At the individual stock level, Microsoft (MSFT) became one of the stocks with the largest net selling by both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter. Mutual funds also reduced holdings across the remaining members of the "Magnificent Seven." While hedge funds trimmed most "Magnificent Seven" holdings, they achieved net buying in META and AAPL.

For semiconductor stocks, hedge funds net bought LRCX, AMAT, and ASML; mutual funds net bought INTC and SITM.

Leverage and Cash: Hedge Funds Aggressive, Mutual Funds Conservative

Faced with escalating geopolitical tensions in Q1, the response strategies of the two types of institutions showed clear divergence.

Hedge funds initially cut net leverage but then quickly increased positions as markets rebounded in Q2, with net exposure rebounding to near a one-year high. Overall leverage relative to historical levels remains elevated.

Mutual funds, on the other hand, opted to increase cash allocations, raising the cash-to-assets ratio from a historical low of 1.1% at the start of 2026 to 1.4% in early April. However, this level remains historically very low, indicating that mutual funds overall have not significantly withdrawn from equity markets.

Sector Consensus and Divergence: Overweight Industrials, Tech Divergence

Regarding sector allocations, there is high consensus between the two types of institutions, but also clear exceptions. Both hedge funds and mutual funds are overweight the Industrials sector and underweight the Information Technology sector, but their reallocation directions were opposite.

Hedge funds increased their net tilt towards Information Technology by 853 basis points in Q1, the largest single-quarter move for the sector on record, while simultaneously reducing their net tilt towards Industrials by 297 basis points. Mutual funds operated in reverse, increasing Industrials exposure by 24 basis points and cutting Information Technology by 20 basis points.

The two sectors with the most prominent divergence are Financials and Consumer Discretionary: mutual funds are overweight Financials while hedge funds are underweight; hedge funds are overweight Consumer Discretionary while mutual funds are underweight.

Four 'Shared Favorites' Outperform the Market Year-to-Date

Goldman Sachs screened for four stocks appearing simultaneously on both the hedge fund VIP list (GSTHHVIP) and the mutual fund overweight list (GSTHMFOW) this quarter: Boeing (BA), Mastercard (MA), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Visa (V). MRVL is a new member this quarter, while Citigroup (C) and Vertiv (VRT) exited the list.

These four stocks have generated a year-to-date return of 10%, outperforming the equal-weighted S&P 500 index by 3 percentage points. Over a longer horizon, since 2013, the "Shared Favorites" basket has an annualized return of 16%, but with a high standard deviation of 22%, indicating significantly higher volatility. Currently, the median stock in this basket trades at a P/E of 34x, a significant premium to the S&P 500 median stock's 18x.

Notably, all "Magnificent Seven" stocks are included in the hedge fund VIP list, yet all are underweighted by mutual funds, forming a sharp contrast in attitudes between the two types of institutions towards these core assets.

Related Questions

QAccording to the analysis of US 13F holdings, what major shift in positioning did both hedge funds and mutual funds make in the tech sector during the first quarter?

ABoth hedge funds and mutual funds engaged in a significant sector rotation within tech: they sold software stocks and aggressively bought into the semiconductor sector. This shift pushed hedge funds' semiconductor long weight to a record high, while software weight fell to its lowest since 2019.

QWhat was the contrasting strategy between hedge funds and mutual funds regarding their use of leverage and cash in response to market conditions?

AHedge funds and mutual funds adopted divergent strategies. Hedge funds increased their net leverage to near a one-year high. In contrast, mutual funds became more conservative, raising their cash allocation from a record low of 1.1% at the start of 2024 to 1.4% by early April, although this level remains historically low.

QWhich specific stock was net sold the most by both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter, and which two semiconductor stocks did hedge funds net buy?

AMicrosoft (MSFT) was one of the largest net sells for both hedge funds and mutual funds last quarter. Hedge funds were net buyers of Lam Research (LRCX) and Applied Materials (AMAT), among other semiconductor stocks.

QWhich four stocks were identified as 'Shared Favorites' by Goldman Sachs this quarter, and how has their performance been year-to-date?

AThe four 'Shared Favorites' stocks (appearing on both the hedge fund VIP list and mutual fund overweight list) are Boeing (BA), Mastercard (MA), Marvell Technology (MRVL), and Visa (V). This group has delivered a 10% return year-to-date, outperforming the equal-weighted S&P 500 index by 3 percentage points.

QHow did the positioning of hedge funds and mutual funds differ regarding the 'Magnificent Seven' stocks and the Financials and Consumer Discretionary sectors?

ARegarding the 'Magnificent Seven,' all members are on the hedge fund VIP list but are underweighted by mutual funds. For sector positioning, mutual funds are overweight Financials while hedge funds are underweight. Conversely, hedge funds are overweight Consumer Discretionary, while mutual funds are underweight that sector.

Related Reads

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit38m ago

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit38m ago

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit43m ago

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit43m ago

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit43m ago

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit43m ago

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报52m ago

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报52m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片