Gate Institutional Weekly Report: BTC Funding Rate Turns Positive, CEX TradFi Trading Volume Soars (March 23–29, 2026)

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-03Last updated on 2026-04-03

Abstract

Last week, the market was primarily driven by a sharp escalation in the U.S.-Iran conflict, which pushed WTI crude oil prices above $100 amid threats to the Strait of Hormuz. This triggered inflation concerns, rising U.S. bond yields, and a sell-off in tech stocks and crypto assets, with major cryptocurrencies falling over 6%. Market sentiment indicators like the VIX and Fear & Greed Index reflected high uncertainty and fear. In crypto ETFs, outflows dominated mid-week with $500M net withdrawn from BTC and ETH products, though slight inflows returned by the weekend. TradFi trading volume on CEXs surged, especially in commodities and metals, while PAXG liquidity recover after initial sell pressure. On-chain, DEX trading cooled, with Meteora on Solana maintaining high volume while others declined. Stablecoin supply remained stable, with DAI showing resilience. LST protocols like Lido and Jito saw reduced activity due to lower ETH and SOL performance. Aave’s lending decreased overall, though Mantle saw growth. Derivatives data showed BTC funding rates briefly turned positive, indicating tentative long interest, though open interest declined and skew remained negative, reflecting defensive sentiment. Implied volatility held steady, suggesting limited expectations for near-term price swings. Gate highlighted progress in data-driven operations, growth in lending, AI integration, and upcoming events including the Hong Kong Web3 Festival.

The core driver of the market last week was the sharp escalation of the US-Iran conflict. As the Strait of Hormuz faced a substantial threat, WTI crude oil prices surged nearly 17% during the week, reclaiming the $100 mark. This simultaneously triggered strong inflation expectations, leading to rising US Treasury yields and dealing a heavy blow to high-valuation tech stocks. The US Dollar Index broke through the 100 mark, suppressing gold's gains. Cryptocurrencies, as high-risk assets, experienced significant selling pressure, with weekly declines exceeding 6%. As the US-Iran conflict entered its fifth week with no signs of resolution, the sell-off continued. Last week's volatility and uncertainty indicators reflected the current macroeconomic tone. The VIX index closed at 31.05, its highest level since the outbreak of the war; while CNN's Fear & Greed Index fell to the "Extreme Fear" level, its lowest since last November. The bond market further adjusted its pricing, with the 10-year US Treasury yield rising to 4.44% and the 30-year US Treasury yield briefly breaking through 5% before retreating to just below that level. This movement reflects the market's entrenched expectation of "higher for longer" interest rates. The market widely believes the possibility of a Fed rate cut before autumn is minimal, while the chance of a 25 basis point rate hike this year is about 25%.

2. Liquidity Analysis

2.1 Crypto ETF Net Flows

Crypto ETF flows showed a clear pattern of "outflows first, recovery later" over the past week: sentiment weakened rapidly mid-week, with spot ETFs seeing a combined net outflow of approximately $500 million—BTC outflows were about $296 million and ETH outflows about $207 million. The selling pressure was mainly concentrated on March 26-27, indicating a clear phase of institutional de-risking. Marginal inflows appeared over the weekend, ending the multi-day outflow trend. Overall, institutional funds remain cautiously allocated amid macroeconomic uncertainty.

2.2 TradFi Liquidity

Over the past week, on-chain trading remained centered around macro asset volatility. Perp DEX TradFi trading volume rose to $17 billion; crude oil trading still had the highest weight but declined sequentially, while gold's share increased again. TradFi perpetual trading volume on CEXs surged, with volume on March 23rd hitting a record high. All sub-categories saw significant growth, with commodities and metals showing the highest sequential increases.

PAXG's market depth changes over the past week exhibited a structural feature of "weak first then strong, with tail-end volume expansion." Early in the week, Delta was mostly negative, coupled with price declines from highs, indicating net selling dominated and liquidity tended to withdraw; subsequently, around March 23rd, a round of concentrated selling pressure emerged, corresponding to a rapid price drop and creating a temporary liquidity vacuum. Depth structure improved significantly over the weekend, with Delta turning consistently positive and the scale significantly expanding, indicating funds began to actively absorb selling and push prices higher.

The number of TradFi asset categories expanded further last week. The total number of TradFi asset categories (counting only TradFi and CFD sections, excluding perpetual contracts) on three major CEXs increased from 598 to 619, a sequential growth of 3.5%. Metals saw the most significant growth, increasing from 22 to 31 items, up 40% sequentially; overall, only Gate saw an increase in the number of TradFi asset categories last week.

3. On-Chain Data Insights

3.1 DEX Trading Cools Down, Meteora Remains High

Trading heat shifted from last week's surge to a cooling phase, with top protocols generally pulling back. Weekly trading volume on both PancakeSwap and Uniswap declined compared to the previous week, indicating a overall convergence of spot trading demand on mainstream chains. The Solana side showed divergence; Meteora remained at a high level slightly above $20 billion in trading volume, but marginal growth has slowed; Raydium's weekly trading volume fell 50% sequentially, the largest drop among top DEXs. Aerodrome, Humidifi, and Bisonfi also saw varying degrees of decline. Looking at the protocol side, PancakeSwap's Infinity architecture and Meteora's DLMM remain the strongest efficiency labels, but the market this week placed more emphasis on确定性 liquidity.

3.2 Stablecoin Supply Consolidates at Highs, DAI Shows Resilience

No new external inflows were seen in the stablecoin sector this week, with overall levels consolidating at highs. USDT remained almost flat compared to the previous week. USDC decreased by about $1.4 billion, and PYUSD also fell by nearly $200 million, indicating demand for payment and settlement-oriented stablecoins slightly declined this week. Protocol-type stablecoins were relatively more stable, with DAI seeing slight growth and USDS maintaining high levels. USD1, USDe, and GHO had minor fluctuations,偏向 structural reallocation. Circle continues to advance the multi-chain expansion of USDC + CCTP, but this week's data reflects a tilt within stablecoins from payment/settlement towards resilience in DeFi scenarios.

3.3 LST Protocols Pull Back, ETH and SOL Both Decelerate

This week, the liquid staking sector saw both ETH and SOL narratives decelerate. Affected by ETH's poor performance, ETH LST funds began阶段性 reducing positions, with TVL declining for both Lido and Rocket Pool. Lido's V3 and EarnETH / EarnUSD vault expansions have broadened the product boundaries, but short-term TVL is more influenced by market risk appetite and staked asset price volatility. The SOL direction also faced pressure, with Jito and Sanctum Validator LSTs, among others, experiencing pullbacks. Overall, the week saw a downturn in the sector's overall risk appetite.

3.4 Aave Loan Volume Pulls Back, Mantle Becomes a Market Absorbing Limited Increment

Aave's total loan balance slightly decreased compared to the previous week. Both the Ethereum main market and Plasma saw declines of about $100 million, indicating deleveraging in mainstream markets. Multi-chain expansion also temporarily slowed this week, with Base and Arbitrum同步 pulling back. Mantle was one of the few markets that grew against the trend, with loan规模 increasing from $555 million to $574 million, becoming the structural highlight of the week. Ink also rose slightly from $289 million to $292 million, but the increase was limited. Aave is recently advancing its V4 Hub-and-Spoke model, and the market is pricing in future cross-market liquidity efficiency, but current funds are prioritizing reducing overall leverage and allocating limited increments to sub-markets with new narratives.

3.5 Divergence in Aave's Three Core Asset Lending Rates Continues

The average floating borrowing APR for USDC rose from 3.10% to 3.23%; demand for USD stablecoins did not weaken同步 with the decline in total loan balance this week. In contrast, USDT fell from 3.10% to 3.02%, and WETH also slightly decreased from 2.25% to 2.23%. While compressing broad risk exposure on-chain this week, lending demand became more concentrated on USDC. From a strategic perspective, this typically corresponds to institutions preferring USDC for liquidity scheduling, collateral management, and neutral strategy turnover. Combined with Aave's latest governance progress, the risk isolation and liquidity routing framework of V4 is gradually becoming clearer. Divergence in interest rates between different assets is likely to become more frequent in the future, better reflecting true capital preferences.

3.6 Protocol Revenue Shifts from Transaction-Driven Back to Stock-Driven

Revenue from trading protocols generally cooled down, while stablecoin issuers remained the most stable profit centers. Weekly revenue for Tether and Circle remained stable at high levels. In contrast, Hyperliquid declined from $14.3025 million to $12.6277 million, Pump fell from $7.1452 million to $6.6905 million, and EdgeX also dropped from $4.5534 million to $3.7969 million; the cooling trading activity has already transmitted to the revenue side. Overall, the main theme of protocol revenue this week was whose revenue is less dependent on short-term trading volatility.

4. Derivatives Tracking

4.1 Funding Rates Shift to Short-Term Bullish, Sentiment Switches to Tentative Longing

BTC funding rates overall showed a structure of shifting from repair to briefly turning positive before fluctuating again. The previously long-standing deep negative, short-dominated pattern has明显 eased. Funding rates turned positive mid-week and remained for several days (peaking near +0.005), indicating the market switched to active long试探, with short-term risk appetite repairing and resonating with the阶段性 price rebound. However, this positive funding rate phase was short-lived and limited in intensity, failing to form a trend-positive premium structure.

4.2 Open Interest Rises Then Falls, Consolidates; Leveraged Funds Turn Watchful

Over the past week, BTC open interest first expanded to a阶段性 high alongside rising prices, but then quickly decreased to around $21B following the price pullback, indicating significant deleveraging in the market. Subsequently, open interest failed to return to previous highs, instead oscillating and repairing within the $21B–$22.5B range, with the overall center of gravity lower. New capital inflow momentum was insufficient, and leverage shifted from expansion to contraction. Overall, the current open interest structure is dominated by存量博弈 (stock game playing), lacking sustained volume配合, and the market remains in a震荡重建阶段 (oscillating rebuilding phase) after deleveraging.

4.3 Option Open Interest Concentrated in Medium-to-Long Term & High Strike Prices, Bullish Structure Prevails

BTC option open interest is mainly concentrated in medium-to-long term contracts like April and June, indicating the market is focused on medium-term positioning; structurally, Calls are significantly higher than Puts, overall still偏向 bullish. Looking at strike prices, Calls are主要集中在 the $80,000–$120,000 range, while Puts are distributed in the $60,000–$80,000 range, forming a typical structure of upside call speculation and downside hedging. It is worth noting that Put open interest in the $60K–$70K range is not low,表明 the market maintains medium-term bullish expectations while also strengthening short-term defensive sentiment.

4.4 Skew in Negative Territory, Short-Term Defensive Sentiment Still Dominates

Over the past week, the BTC 25D Skew overall remained in negative territory (approx. -6 to -10), with Puts still carrying a premium relative to Calls, indicating the market's assessment of downside risk remains relatively high. Shorter cycles (7D, 30D) were more volatile, falling rapidly before briefly repairing, reflecting反复 switching short-term sentiment; medium-to-long term (60D and above) was relatively stable, overall maintaining in the -5 to -7 range, showing little change in medium-term risk expectations. Overall, the Skew did not show a sustained recovery to near neutral or positive values, meaning that although there were repair attempts, defensive positioning still dominates.

4.5 Implied Volatility Stabilizes, Market Expects Limited Short-Term Volatility

Over the past week, the BTC DVol index overall oscillated within the 52%–55% range, first slightly declining then rising again, without a trend increase. The market's pricing of future volatility remains relatively restrained overall. During this period, prices experienced significant declines, but implied volatility only rose温和, without panic amplification, indicating the market did not view the current adjustment as a high-risk event. Overall, IV showed some desensitization from price, reflecting traders' inclination towards range-bound volatility expectations rather than unilateral trend行情 (market moves).

5. Week Ahead Outlook

6. Gate Institutional Dynamics

Refined Operations

1. Advancing data-driven and refined management,精准定位 customer needs, enriching customized solutions.

2. Significant results in dormant user activation.

Capital Business

1. Collateralized lending scale continues to grow, approaching bull market levels.

2. BTC interest rates下调, driving new demand growth.

Product & Technology

1. Websocket contract BBO real-time push achieved full availability in April.

2. AI gradually implemented, institutional services entering the AI-assisted operation phase.

Events & Marketing

1. CrossEx Advanced Trading Incentive Program launched, offering up to -0.01% contract rebate maker fees starting April 9th.

2. April Hong Kong Web3 Festival Side Event即将开启 (coming soon).

Data Sources:

• Investing, https://investing.com/currencies/xau-usd-historical-data

• Gate, https://www.gate.com/trade/BTC_USDT

• CMC, https://coinmarketcap.com/real-world-assets/?type=all-tokens

• Coinglass, https://www.coinglass.com/pro/depth-delta

• Dune, https://dune.com/gateresearch/gate-institutional-weekly-report

• CryptoQuant, https://cryptoquant.com/asset/btc/chart/derivatives

• Amberdata, https://pro.amberdata.io/options/deribit/btc/current/

Gate Research Institute is a comprehensive blockchain and cryptocurrency research platform, providing readers with in-depth content including technical analysis, hot topic insights, market reviews, industry research, trend predictions, and macroeconomic policy analysis.

Disclaimer

Cryptocurrency market investment involves high risks. It is recommended that users conduct independent research and fully understand the nature of the assets and products they purchase before making any investment decisions. Gate is not responsible for any losses or damages resulting from such investment decisions.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main driver of the market last week and how did it impact cryptocurrency prices?

AThe main driver was the sharp escalation of the US-Iran conflict, which threatened the Strait of Hormuz. This caused WTI crude oil prices to surge nearly 17%, reigniting inflation expectations. As a result, US Treasury yields rose, putting pressure on high-valuation tech stocks. Cryptocurrencies, as high-risk assets, experienced significant selling, with weekly losses exceeding 6%.

QHow did the net flows for crypto ETFs perform last week, and what was the trend for BTC and ETH specifically?

ACrypto ETF flows showed a clear pattern of 'outflows first, followed by a recovery.' Mid-week, sentiment weakened rapidly, with spot ETFs seeing a combined net outflow of approximately $500 million. Specifically, outflows were about $296 million for BTC and $207 million for ETH, with the selling pressure concentrated on March 26-27. A marginal inflow occurred over the weekend, ending the multi-day outflow trend.

QWhat was notable about the trading volume of TradFi perpetual contracts on CEXs last week?

AThe trading volume of TradFi perpetual contracts on CEXs surged significantly last week. Notably, March 23rd set a new all-time high for trading volume. All sub-categories saw substantial growth, with commodities and metals recording the highest month-over-month increases.

QWhat was the trend for BTC funding rates last week, and what did it indicate about market sentiment?

ABTC funding rates shifted from a deep negative, bearish-dominated structure to briefly turning positive (reaching nearly +0.005) mid-week. This indicated a shift towards active long positioning and a repair in short-term risk appetite, resonating with a temporary price rebound. However, this positive rate phase was short-lived and of limited intensity, failing to establish a sustained positive premium structure.

QHow did the Aave lending market perform last week, and which specific market was a structural bright spot?

AThe total loan balance on Aave saw a slight decline compared to the previous week. The main Ethereum market and Plasma both decreased by approximately $100 million, showing deleveraging in mainstream markets. Multi-chain expansion also slowed. Mantle was a structural bright spot, with its loan scale increasing from $555 million to $574 million, representing a rare instance of growth.

Related Reads

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit25m ago

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit25m ago

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit34m ago

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit34m ago

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit2h ago

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy CORE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing CORE (CORE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy CORE (CORE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your CORE (CORE)After purchasing your CORE (CORE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade CORE (CORE)Easily trade CORE (CORE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy CORE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of CORE (CORE) are presented below.

活动图片